General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow Milton Friedman and Reaganomic's Worked to Destroy Public Schools With Propaganda
"The Myth Behind Public School Failure"--How Milton Friedman and Reaganomic's Worked to Destroy Public Schools
The beginning of reform
To truly understand how we came to believe our educational system is broken, we need a history lesson. Rewind to 1980when Milton Friedman, the high priest of laissez-faire economics, partnered with PBS to produce a ten-part television series called Free to Choose. He devoted one episode to the idea of school vouchers, a plan to allow families what amounted to publicly funded scholarships so their children could leave the public schools and attend private ones.
In the rush to privatize the countrys schools, corporations and politicians have decimated school budgets, replaced teaching with standardized testing, and placed the blame on teachers and students.
by Dean Paton
The beginning of reform
To truly understand how we came to believe our educational system is broken, we need a history lesson. Rewind to 1980when Milton Friedman, the high priest of laissez-faire economics, partnered with PBS to produce a ten-part television series called Free to Choose. He devoted one episode to the idea of school vouchers, a plan to allow families what amounted to publicly funded scholarships so their children could leave the public schools and attend private ones.
You could make a strong argument that the current campaign against public schools started with that single TV episode. To make the case for vouchers, free-market conservatives, corporate strategists, and opportunistic politicians looked for any way to build a myth that public schools were failing, that teachers (and of course their unions) were at fault, and that the cure was vouchers and privatization.
Jonathan Kozol, the author and tireless advocate for public schools, called vouchers the single worst, most dangerous idea to have entered education discourse in my adult life.
Armed with Friedmans ideas, President Reagan began calling for vouchers. In 1983, his National Commission on Excellence in Education issued A Nation At Risk, a report that declared, the educational foundations of our society are presently being eroded by a rising tide of mediocrity that threatens our very future as a Nation and a people.
It also said, If an unfriendly foreign power had attempted to impose on America the mediocre educational performance that exists today, we might well have viewed it as an act of war.
Published on Saturday, February 22, 2014 by YES! Magazine
http://www.yesmagazine.org/issues/education-uprising/the-myth-behind-public-school-failure
Republished by "Common Dreams under Creative Commons License
(92 COMMENTS AT THE "Common Dreams" SITE....A GOOD READ!
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2014/02/22-0
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)I want is more of what I have been seeing among black and Hispanic youth since PBO became President - more more more parental involvement and controls and a huge emphasis on academic excellence, especially in STEM!
El_Johns
(1,805 posts)with samples large enough to report results for both student groups.
Score gaps between higher- and lower-income students widened from 2003 to 2011 in seven states/jurisdictions. Score gaps between higher- and lower-income students narrowed from 2003 to 2011 in four states.
http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pubs/main2011/2012457.aspx
Curmudgeoness
(18,219 posts)Very informative.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Joe Bacon
(5,165 posts)The alliance formed between Catholic bishops, "Christian" Schools and segregated "academies" in the south to push for vouchers. All three of them merged into the Christian Right attack on public schools.
When I lived in Pennsylvania during the 70s and 80s, there was a State Repesentative, Martin Mullen, who always pushed vouchers. Mullen was a right wing Catholic who kept pushing bill after bill. Governors would veto the bills, Mullen and his Religious Right allies would override, the law would be challenged in the courts and thrown out. Didn't stop Mullen at all.
You have to add the Religious Right in with Milton Friedman.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)I attended Catholic schools for ten years. But I do not believe in public funding of private schools.
rickyhall
(4,889 posts)More rich kids go to private schools, get tutors, get food. Leaving a lower percentage of advantaged kids, a higher percentage of disadvantaged kids.
The statistics of inequality. The class war goes and on.
Samantha
(9,314 posts)My daughter, her husband and my sister are teachers. My daughter and her husband both teach at a private school, which is funded by parents' tuition payments and from a scholarship fund generated by the alumni. That I believe is the way it should be. My sister teaches at a public school, and although she has a degree from American University is paid very little.
On the other hand, my nephew (around 28 at the time of the following discussion) point-blank asked me, when I was criticizing the decline of public school in favor of vouchers, "I don't have any kids in public schools. Why should I pay for other people's children to be educated?" I was floored. I answered him because those other people's kids one day will be running our society, and he does not want to trust that responsibility to undereducated people.
It is a huge debate, but my feeling is we have an obligation to provide an excellent education to all children, regardless of where they live and how much money the family has. We need to respect our teachers and others involved in the system in order to have the system work well. And for those who choose to patronize expensive private schools, I support the system at my daughter's school. Private schools have the ability to offer scholarships to high achievers of low income.
Sam
erronis
(15,382 posts)but isn't this section arguing a different case?
How can a poor child have the same opportunities as the students in that private school? Yes, I know there are various scholarships, but they no way match the funding of the rich parents.
Being poor (or even being middle class, now) puts limitations on transportation to the school; clothing, equipment, computer budgets; going out to events or trips with classmates, hanging, etc.
We all may be created equally (26 chromosomes) but in no way do we have equal access to quality of life.
copperearth
(117 posts)White conservative people didn't like public schools for a number of reasons-the biggest of these was desegergation. So school vouchers were a way of getting around blacks and whites in the same school. Also they don't like unions so that was the second biggest concern.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts)Yes, because "TEH FREE MARKETZ CAN DO NO WRONGZ" people REALLY give two shits about kids and old people on fixed incomes . . . oh wait, THEY DON'T. All they care about is that it's just one more thing "TEH STATE" shouldn't meddle in.
GOD these people are exhausting to deal with. I can't even force myself to take the bait anymore.
johnnyreb
(915 posts)I was however in the white neighborhoods and schools. In high school I was subjected to "integration", in which blacks and whites were forcibly mixed via federally-mandated bussing to assigned schools. This was utterly wrenching, taking me away from half my school friends forever to thrust me into my arch-rival high school with a significant number of black strangers who had also been yanked from their schools. After about three weeks of false bravado, machismo and some fights and chairs-through-windows and sheriffs and news reporters, most of us became fast friends and continued with our fine public school education. Vital Social Purpose accomplished.
We can do much better than the fucking profitizers at most anything.