General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"It's ridiculous to talk about freedom in a society dominated by huge corporations ..."
RainDog
(28,784 posts)indepat
(20,899 posts)Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)Upton Sinclair
bobduca
(1,763 posts)Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)Corporations are immortal zombies.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)Just ask any of the parasites and their followers.
xchrom
(108,903 posts)reformist2
(9,841 posts)daleanime
(17,796 posts)blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)colsohlibgal
(5,275 posts)What never ceases to amaze me is that so many otherwise smart people can't see what the US really is in 2014.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)in the USA.
Decades ago, I was free to start my own landscaping business which did fairly well
Small businesses:
Represent 99.7% of all employer firms.
Employ half of all private sector employees.
Pay 44% of total U.S. private payroll.
Generated 65% of net new jobs over the past 17 years.
Create more than half of the nonfarm private GDP.
Hire 43% of high tech workers (scientists, engineers, computer programmers, and others).
Are 52% home-based and 2% franchises.
Made up 97.5% of all identified exporters and produced 31% of export value in FY 2008.
Produce 13 times more patents per employee than large patenting firms.
cannondale
(96 posts)I'll assume you forgot to read Chomsky's quote. Or were you implying that you now own a huge corporation?
If one of the greatest minds on this topic is a windbag, then what do you call people who have less knowledge?
Jakes Progress
(11,122 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)That whooshing sound you just heard was Chomsky's point flying over your head.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)of freedom, as my post points out and refutes Chomsky's first sentence.
And to talk about corporations as 'authoritarian' is flat out Libertarian stupidity.
Now, no where do I laud an unregulated market.
I have, over all the years on DU, consistently spoken out against deregulation of large corporations.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)when the corporations have usurped the democracy and now write their own legislation/regulation and determine the outcome of elections.
JoeyT
(6,785 posts)You know those teabaggers that shriek "SOCIALIST!!!" every time someone disagrees with them about something? Boy they sure are funny, aren't they?
cprise
(8,445 posts)And there is no question that large corporations are inherently authoritarian. Its a big factor in people becoming politically disengaged and meek.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)natural resources that keep the small businesses going, even much of the food that the owners and employees eat, is obtained and sold to all those small businesses, their owners and employees thanks to an unseen collusion between the government and big businesses. This collusion is used to grab resources from other countries and subsidize big business in a number of ways using tax revenue. It is also used to keep employee's wages low under the excuse of preventing "inflation."
The small businesses pay big companies for "supplies" and the raw materials with which they make their products or deliver their services. But the small businesses are getting a huge subsidy themselves thanks to the protection that the US government including the military provides to keep up the illusion that we are capitalist.
In fact, our economy is not nearly as capitalist as small business owners think. They just don't realize that the taxes they pay go in part to support a lot of activities by their government that lower the prices on raw materials and permit the US to maintain the illusion of a free market while in fact meddling greatly at a number of points, especially with regard to providing energy resources and especially with regard to oil. And especially through our military and diplomatic sometimes heavyhandedness. And much of that heavyhandedness is labeled top secret. We ordinary people are not allowed to look at what is turning the wheels of our economy. Much of it would disgust us beyond belief at least until we tried living in our country without all that heavyhandedness.
Small business owners do some good things. But . . . . what they don't know and don't pay attention to about what is going on, say, in the State Department or the Department of Agriculture or the Securities Exchange Commission or the Commodities Commission or the Attorney General's office or the Fed that actually determines whether they can succeed or will be allowed to fail. Of course, the government does not target certain small businesses for success or failure (at least I have no proof they do), but it is their job to keep the spigots open for small businesses to do their thing. And part of keeping those spigots open is, in a succession of many years of different regimes in D.C., a matter of doing things Americans might be ashamed of and then making sure that Americans don't find out about it.
And so we are in the surveillance and propaganda state and most people don't know it and don't want to know it and would do anything to fool themselves into thinking we are not.
I suggest you read Greg Palast's saga of corruption, Vulture's Picnic. It is an eye-opener. Chapter 6 is especially interesting, but you need to start at the beginning and read the entire book. Tells a lot of fascinating, eye-opening stories. Not a boring read either.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)It's amazing how the corporations collude and how the government can at times be part of the collusion. Chapter 6 is especially interesting. Our government is owned by the big corporations. Small business is a great thing but it depends on that collusion and secrecy at the top without realizing just how bad and determinative it really is.
But I am not putting down small business people like you. I know how aware and active you are on DU for example. But all those "I did it by myself" petty Republicans who think they really are self-made and owe no one a thing have no idea how much they owe to a lot of shady business at the top, the very shady business that the naive Tea-Partiers criticize but refuse to vote to do anything about.
Jakes Progress
(11,122 posts)stillcool
(32,626 posts)Defined as a small business. The "Service" Indrusty consists of mostly the "small" businesses I think of, and they in no way meet those statistics. They are restaurants, landscapers, plumbers, painters, builders, nail salons....anything to do with providing a service. It is getting harder and harder to succeed, but if you live in a wealthy area it's better. Poor people aren't real big on paying for landscaping.. Glad to hear you're doing well...especially this time of the year.
dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)so we can see what definition of "small business" was used when compiling those facts.
Surprising to see on this site someone using small business stats to make the case that big corporations don't dominate the U.S. They obviously dominate our political system regardless of small business stats.
It's similar to how nearly half of Obama's campaign contributions came from small donors, yet the large donors are the ones who are in the room when policy decisions are made.
Rex
(65,616 posts)I love watching people get that quote purposefully wrong, as if they can relate.
Marr
(20,317 posts)He's talking about huge corporations.
I'm a small business owner, and have been for decades, too. He is not talking about my little business. I would've thought that would be obvious to anyone.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)And spare me from those who toss out info as it it were true without supplying a reference to the source of their "facts".
fasttense
(17,301 posts)It's that corporations are so much more powerful than the small businesses.
Corporations can afford legions of lobbyists and can pay for politician's campaigns. They bribe judges by hiring their relatives and they give bonuses to their former employees for taking regulatory jobs in government. They buy up their competition and destroy competition with their monopolies.
Corporations never die so their wealth just builds and builds and builds.
The Boston Tea Party was all about a corporation (the East India Tea Company - owned by royalty) getting a special tax rate to wipe out their competition in the colonies. It's truly American to fight against them.
fascisthunter
(29,381 posts)And you know he wasn't talking about "small businesses". But you purposefully want others to believe he was.... so transparent.
qwertyq
(47 posts)most average Americans that identify as capitalists or own small businesses are merely hobbyists in the grand scheme of things.
Jakes Progress
(11,122 posts)don't seem to be able to read. How does "huge corporations" equal "small, family business"?
Why would you deliberately be so obtuse? Spitting out the figures from your local Chamber flyer only shows only lack of honor or intellectual dishonesty.
Or do you employ two or three thousand mowers and shrub pruners? Thats a lot of people you employ there. I guess with your payroll of a thousand gardeners, you are able to spread a lot of mulch and manure.
-p
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Nailed it.
MO_Moderate
(377 posts)but if he lives in a country dominated by huge corporations, I don't want to live there.
Poor guy.
Response to MO_Moderate (Reply #18)
woo me with science This message was self-deleted by its author.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)Also, once in college, his name will come up in classes.
Avram Noam Chomsky is an American linguist, philosopher, cognitive scientist, logician, political commentator and activist. Sometimes described as the "father of modern linguistics", Chomsky is also a major figure in analytic philosophy.
BOOKS:
Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media
Book by Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky
The Political Economy of the Mass Media, by Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky, is an analysis of the news media
Hegemony or Survival
Book by Noam Chomsky
Hegemony or Survival: America's Quest for Global Dominance is a study of the "American Empire" written by the American linguist and political activist Noam Chomsky, then a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Wikipedia
Published: November 2003
MO_Moderate
(377 posts)Rider3
(919 posts)I detest Corporate America.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)Corporations, especially those in the services sector, rely on their employees initiative, judgment, and flexible response to business needs. Corporations that attempt the military chain of command model usually fail.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)That's amusingly naive at best.
http://pando.com/2014/01/23/the-techtopus-how-silicon-valleys-most-celebrated-ceos-conspired-to-drive-down-100000-tech-engineers-wages/
Later that year, Schmidt instructed his Sr VP for Business Operation Shona Brown to keep the pact a secret and only share information verbally, since I dont want to create a paper trail over which we can be sued later?
These secret conversations and agreements between some of the biggest names in Silicon Valley were first exposed in a Department of Justice antitrust investigation launched by the Obama Administration in 2010. That DOJ suit became the basis of a class action lawsuit filed on behalf of over 100,000 tech employees whose wages were artificially lowered an estimated $9 billion effectively stolen by the high-flying companies from their workers to pad company earnings in the second half of the 2000s. Last week, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals denied attempts by Apple, Google, Intel, and Adobe to have the lawsuit tossed, and gave final approval for the class action suit to go forward. A jury trial date has been set for May 27 in San Jose, before US District Court judge Lucy Koh, who presided over the Samsung-Apple patent suit.
In a related but separate investigation and ongoing suit, eBay and its former CEO Meg Whitman, now CEO of HP, are being sued by both the federal government and the state of California for arranging a similar, secret wage-theft agreement with Intuit (and possibly Google as well) during the same period.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)moondust
(20,006 posts)Variations: "The country is headed toward a single and splendid government of an aristocracy founded on banking institutions and moneyed incorporations and if this tendency continues it will be the end of freedom and democracy, the few will be ruling...I hope we shall...crush in its birth the aristocracy of our moneyed corporations which dare already to challenge our government to trial and bid defiance to the laws of our country. I sincerely believe that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies."[1]
http://www.monticello.org/site/research-and-collections/end-democracyquotation
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Michigan-Arizona
(762 posts)marvinsacco
(33 posts)I detest Corporate America.
[div style="display:none;"]QHIF
QVCV
MNDQ
JZTN
MYYL
FQQM
LWBX
VYED
OUVZ
ZNCF
NZGB
HYSC
ZMEX
NRDY
CRDY
BWBW
LGDA
HROH
TTUW
FBSI
ZCPF
UWKO
QXBJ
MUPQ
WNZJ
CEKI
MPNK
HGGT
VYJA
CFEU
DRWN
WXEW
HVDC
TLYQ
HZVV
LHBT
XVUX
UTAE
QMPO
CJXU
FUSE
XWGF
MHGI
GTJK
XANV
TGMH
QZDH
VAOT
OWXT
RRNS
ETFH
IEUR
DFTS
YSCN
BHHH
VSDH
LQTI
PXEH
FDBI
UMET
BRBC
XOHI
MGDZ
CHTH
RQPI
CSOG
ZNYM
UIHG
IMTM
PUEZ
FWAP
FAGP
KVAS
VUIJ
HCSN
UMRM
QLES
YASA
VDOQ
UKRW
DPSZ
ECUM
QMVO
EOPV
RDXK
ITVI
LYIJ
JKRY
LPTS
GVIN
TQQB
CUXE
CSHJ
OOLJ
OPCP
OQDN
USIT
QZFC
IMXO
OHTH
WUPU
SWJP
XXJV
WOAI
ONLQ
PZVT
KSZG
AFDA
BWUI
WMKY
DUQW
SWHJ
LNEF
CQPC
KGZE
ABXL
BRIQ
WTEY
ZGBZ
ODDO
ABQB
APHJ
XKXA
SVSH
LWWJ
IMLC
SWUD
IRZN
LPAL
IXIK
EMOZ
RKGD
VSSD
CCMQ
MJUD
IWHE
ASNM
UTBH
UOTC
JQDA
WCEQ
PRSH
SSHL
EFHO
NHFB
HBRK
ALRK
QRSS
HHJX
FRHV
XREI
SMHH
PUHG
TFXK
VSNG
UGPT
DOOY
JEQE
YRNG
JNZZ
WUUZ
RXDB
XXEG
CMKL
FXOK
FRNC
WBOY
WDNW
RTCB
HVUP
YEMP
OERN
JWTW
SXMY
UMVI
FNZL
HKCN
MKRA
CGXF
OMOQ
SZRH
BDIB
TDNJ
UOUB
ZWCX
YREQ
LCQI
OPFS
UIMA
DYIF
UMPQ
OTEP
JSKH
MGAQ
LRVA
MFHK
BOWW
RHNP
BHUN
WFCM
WOOX
ZVNJ
KACE
PJOF
YRWM
HJGM
IBAB
YMHF
ROTT
GPPZ
LTDM
RVIW
CTTY
ZZSR
WSEJ
QSWQ
HNAS
YSFM
AIXM
KYZO
NVBC
YWNQ
SJYS
HIJL
KLRB
CRLC
MJKI
QULD
OTBB
DSTX
XXNF
ESVX
HXSM
SLLW
WMFK
RLYV
SGOX
RSIO
SNZD
SOHD
LORK
NOJA
GNZT
JAFN
THSH
TESQ
FHMA
OGTP
TRYC
UJJR
CZBQ
JLQU
NAHX
KBFJ
OPJW
SVUU
VTMT
VEFA
YFUZ
PNXA
LEIX
LPAZ
CIHN
FBUM
ZJUY
TFXO
EHNN
LWCO
OIUZ
WVCB
JRQU
FWBY
KXWW
HMFS
ZDLT
YCDP
SWRX
EKEQ
VKUY
UCEI
DYEN
GCOG
HUFJ
VKYQ
YDYQ
CLYT
FYQE
TDFU
SRZE
TROW
NGSZ
VLIA
LYOB
ROCP
KZUT
MOPH
UUDH
NAEK
CCEI
XHXB
WGRZ
WKCQ
SULY
SPSC
GGUQ
YETK
HRER
TTXQ
DDJT
CGLD
QRXN
RAJE
PEJQ
DQQK
DPGQ
EWKI
BXKV
QHKF
CLQZ
NPFN
LVBB
YTRO
NCND
VWTF
QAKG
LXMC
AOIL
VIDY
TUQV
UUGN
NNET
VWKA
QREZ
ZDYS
QSNS
IZSJ
JAPZ
WOLS
JCEX
ZVNZ
VGFK
QNVW
BECJ
OPPL
CFER
WWOL
YRFS
OYAI
DORK
GGRN
IUKB
FYSZ
UOHJ
ROOD
NYBL
HWRG
UHPB
LIZP
QQZF
LQWP
WTAI
CCOT
OOXS
VCAA
LJXF
MYOE
FOQN
SVZB
NLGF
DFGT
XEPP
TFRG
EGJE
POJJ
QSQD
LLSY
DROQ
YZRK
IEYA
OKVX
SZUT
BWRS
SPMX
VKSV
TKAN
ZMKC
HWYI
BZNU
LJZQ
VFWL
XCLS
QJQY
ORMH
HJWK
LZKP
IAAC
YSIA
LFFF
DCGR
CYAA
RAFI
FGXT
XINF
JVXR
WJUD
ZWKV
WCBM
CCGW
LNGR
TDLW
QLVR
PODF
NTTK
KDLF
EYYX
ZQZB
TQAB
EFPN
VQCZ
MSGN
DMOV
FSWF
YKNH
TSSZ
WWES
MEZF
MSIZ
XEWU
CPGB
DUFA
ODED
SXVA
EVBR
BRJK
YJHF
KAMT
QGVT
WLTQ
UNVN
IOEK
JJWM
BEYJ
NMEU
NLYF
HIIE
AFEU
NWQJ
RCPO
HEMQ
LXUG
TWDT
RRDR
CIEJ
CAAU
CFWJ
RQCO
SCYL
SUDB
ZYRH
VHOC
NXUF
OSAV
NGOI
MQCS
XFFP
UJTX
STFU
GQLH
IVHV
GHHX
DYPY
SXRP
XPIH
BQSB
CCHZ
MZPY
CJQV
WMFO
LTOI
OFRF
WQOC
BWUU
NGMS
DDYI
VQVY
TKRD
ATIJ
HDQK
HPNX
BXHG
NKHI
YDQF
REWY
YYTI
XGBV
IMVV
OGRB
ZWPP
UXJI
DAAW
ctsnowman
(1,903 posts)jsr
(7,712 posts)fascisthunter
(29,381 posts)There is way too much corporate influence and control in the USA and the rest of the world.
Laelth
(32,017 posts)-Laelth