Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
Thu Feb 27, 2014, 05:12 AM Feb 2014

State Department Watchdog Finds No Problem With Oil Industry Contractor Writing Keystone XL Report

The State Department’s Inspector General on Wednesday released its long-awaited report on the Keystone XL pipeline and whether the contractor hired to write the Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement had a conflict of interest.

This report is narrowly targeted at the internal process used to select contractor Environmental Resources Management (ERM) to write the report State will use to base its decision on the Keystone XL pipeline. ERM has worked for Chevron and Shell, two oil companies working to develop the tar sands in Alberta, Canada. Another contractor, EnSys Energy, has worked for ExxonMobil, BP, and Koch Industries. These large corporations are invested in the continued development of the Canadian tar sands oil deposits.

The Inspector General’s report was a chance to shed more light on how these companies were chosen to write Environmental Impact Statements


snip

“The inspector general was only asked to examine whether the State Department followed its own flawed process for selecting a third party contractor,” Rep. Raúl Grijalva (D-AZ) said.
“The fact that the answer is ‘yes’ doesn’t address any outstanding concerns about the integrity of ERM’s work, the State Department’s in-house ability to evaluate its quality, or whether the process itself needs to be reformed. This isn’t evidence that there’s no problem here — this is evidence of the problem.”

Earlier on Wednesday, Grijalva announced he was asking the General Accountability Office to look into the process State uses to select contractors free of conflict-of-interest.
Last year, Representative Henry Waxman (D-CA) and Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) sent a letter to the State Department urging the agency to review the contribution the proposed Keystone XL pipeline would have on U.S. carbon emissions.

http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/02/26/3337221/keystone-state-oig-report/


In other news, they have not seen any problems with fox writing report about security of henhouse.

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Egalitarian Thug

(12,448 posts)
2. But Our Fearless Leader wants this, so it must be good. You are a racist hater!
Thu Feb 27, 2014, 05:56 AM
Feb 2014

The Goldman-Sachs administration would never, ever so anything that isn't good for the country!

BBR Esq

(87 posts)
6. “In a lot of ways Richard Nixon was more liberal than I was,”
Thu Feb 27, 2014, 08:09 AM
Feb 2014

Obama said. “He started the EPA, started a whole lot of the regulatory state that has helped keep our air and water clean.”

http://nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news/2014/02/03/22560607-obama-says-fox-newss-oreilly-absolutely-unfair-in-extended-interview

 

badtoworse

(5,957 posts)
8. ERM is a legitimate environmental consultant with an extensive client list
Thu Feb 27, 2014, 09:47 AM
Feb 2014

Environmental consultants usually work for a broad range of businesses and have a vested interest in maintaining their reputation for integrity. The fact that ERM has done work for the oil companies (among many other companies) is irrelevant. I pulled the following list off their website:

AkzoNobel
Alcatel-Lucent
Amprion
Anglo American
Australian Department of Defence
BASF
Bayer
Becton Dickinson
BNPL
BNSF Railway Company
Boehringer Ingelheim
Boeing
Chevron USA Inc.
Danaher
Dell
DuPont
Energy Resources
E.ON Kraftwerke
Evonik Industries
Ford Motor Company
General Electric
Ingersoll-Rand
Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson
Nalco
Newcrest Mining Limited
Novartis
Oracle
Panasonic
Peru LNG
Plains All American Pipeline
Procter & Gamble
Rio Tinto
Sanofi-Aventis
SATORP
Schlumberger
Scotia Gas Network
Scottish & Southern Energy Renewables
Shell International Petroleum Ltd
Siemens
Statoil
Suez Environment
Syngenta
Texas Custodial Trust
Total
Tullow Ghana Ltd
Unilever


Just out of curiosity, who would you have do the study?

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
9. ERM Also Green-Lighted Explosive, Faulty Peruvian Pipeline Project
Thu Feb 27, 2014, 09:57 AM
Feb 2014

The project in a nutshell: a 253-mile-long, 34-inch pipeline carries gas obtained from Peru's Camisea field - located partly in the Amazon rainforest with the pipeline snaking through the Andes Mountains - to Peru's west coast. From there, it's exported primarily to the U.S. and Mexico.

Camisea - described by Amazon Watch as the "most damaging project in the Amazon Basin" - has created a whole host of problems. These include displacing indigenous people, clear-cutting forests that serve as a key global carbon sink to make way for the project, and major pipeline spills, to name a few.

Environmentally Sound...Except for Faulty Pipelines, Explosions

ERM performed the Environmental and Social Review Summary for Peru LNG on behalf of the International Finance Corporation (IFC), one of the tentacles of the World Bank Group. The Review lasted between Sept. 2006 and Jan. 2008.

Peru LNG, which went online in June 2010, is co-owned by an international consortium of corporations including the U.S.-based, Hunt Oil. LNG is a bit of a misnomer: the project is not only the LNG export terminal itself, but also an accompanying 253-mile pipeline carrying Camisea's gas to Peru's west coast and is sometimes referred to as "Camisea II." In so doing, it traverses some of the country's most pristine areas in the Andes and Amazon.

According to the IFC Corporation, ERM Group reviewed every aspect of the proposed project.





http://desmogblog.com/2013/04/03/state-dept-keystone-xl-contractor-erm-explosive-faulty-peruvian-pipeline-project



Environmental Resources Management has been at the center of many controversial environmental assessments.
http://desmogblog.com/environmental-resources-management

 

badtoworse

(5,957 posts)
11. An environmernmental consultant reviews whether and how the environmental impacts can be mitigated.
Thu Feb 27, 2014, 10:14 AM
Feb 2014

They don't build the project and they don't operate it. If the firms that do those things cut corners and there are accidents, it's on them, not the environmental consulatant.

I've had a lot of experience with environmental consultants. They recommend best practices and how to minimize impacts, not how to skirt regulations and trash the environment.

I've been in the energy business for more than 30 years and I have yet to see an energy project, of any kind, that wasn't opposed by environmentalists. If they had their way, we'd still be living in caves, no doubt freezing because the environmentalists would be screaming about how camp fires would damage the environment.

BTW, you didn't say who you would have do the study.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»State Department Watchdog...