Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe 3 Biggest Surprises From An Investigation Into A Swiss Bank That Helps Americans Dodge Taxes
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2014/02/26/3332701/senate-investigation-tax-evasion-credit-suisse/***SNIP
1. Credit Suisse actively recruited American clients, rather than acting as a passive facilitator. While you might think that a rich American looking to duck tax liabilities would have to go seek out the right banker to help him, the Senate investigation says thats not the case. In over 150 separate trips from 2001 to 2008, the bank sent employees from Switzerland to the U.S. to secretly recruit clients at golf tournaments, swanky formal parties put on by Swiss socialites, and individual meetings. To justify the trips to their bosses, bankers had to show that at least a quarter of their meetings were with prospects who didnt yet have accounts.
After selling these clients on the banks tax evasion specialties, Credit Suisse employees helped Americans set up shell corporations to move their money outside of the Internal Revenue Services (IRS) reach, as well as credit cards and cash transfers to access the hidden money without triggering suspicion from tax officials. The system seems to have led bankers to behave like characters from a paperback spy novel, with one Credit Suisse employee hiding a clients bank statement inside a magazine and passing it over the breakfast table at a New York hotel. The banks New York office kept a list of phone numbers for intermediaries who specialized in the multinational corporate law practices required by the evasion system the bank offered its clients. All of this happened in violation of numerous internal Credit Suisse policies, including a 2002 policy that was supposed to force all U.S. clients through one small branch office whose employees were specifically trained in international tax law compliance.
2. American authorities are doing a poor job fighting Swiss tax evasion. Department of Justice (DOJ) officials have talked a big game about cracking down on the kinds of practices revealed in the committees report for five years now, but the investigation concludes that the agencies arent backing up their big talk. DOJ and IRS enforcement efforts to hold U.S. tax evaders and Swiss banks accountable for misconduct have bogged down, the investigators write, with prosecutors failing to act on the information banks have already shared. The UBS settlement produced a list of 4,700 American accountholder names, yet the DOJ has only prosecuted 71 tax evaders from that list. Subpoenas on other banks have gone unenforced and DOJ has ceded control over the information collection process to the Swiss government, further undermining its already lax enforcement efforts. An IRS voluntary disclosure program has managed to recoup $6 billion in back taxes and penalties from 43,000 U.S. taxpayers who hid their money offshore, but that is a small amount compared to the total that banks around the world are likely hiding from the agency.
3. The amount of American money hidden away at just one Swiss bank is massive. Credit Suisses work with American clients peaked in 2006, according to the report, with more than 22,000 accounts linked to the U.S. and between $10 and $12 billion in total assets held in them. Not all of those assets were hidden from American authorities, but investigators write that the vast majority were. Estimates of how much money the bank hid from American tax authorities range widely depending on how the estimates are done, the report says, from a $5 billion estimate using the banks own methods to a $12 billion estimate using a more rigorous approach.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 1354 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (32)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The 3 Biggest Surprises From An Investigation Into A Swiss Bank That Helps Americans Dodge Taxes (Original Post)
xchrom
Feb 2014
OP
Law enforcement must be reserved for people who don't return their DVDs...
theHandpuppet
Feb 2014
#4
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)2. K&R But not one surprise in the lot.
Did anybody seriously think that this administration was ever going to go after any rich criminals, or any of the global infrastructure they've built in order to evade taxes?
theHandpuppet
(19,964 posts)4. Law enforcement must be reserved for people who don't return their DVDs...
... then there's always the scourge of jaywalkers who don't carry papers and those criminal elements who are behind the wheel DWB.
Seriously, though... no, not in a thousand years did I ever think justice and the law applied to the uber-rich. Never has.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)3. Have-Mores own Washington.
Money talks. Heh heh heh.
TroubleMan
(4,859 posts)6. I think the biggest surprise is that they were investigated at all.
Now let's go after some more banks.