Suffering? Well, You Deserve It
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/suffering_well_you_deserve_it_20140302
Chris Hedges:
Offer, the author of The Challenge of Affluence: Self-Control and Well-Being in the United States and Britain Since 1950 (
http://www.amazon.com/Challenge-Affluence-Self-Control-Well-Being-Britain/dp/0198208537/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1393801776&sr=1-1&keywords=the+challenge+of+affluence) , for 25 years has explored the cavernous gap between our economic and social reality and our ruling economic ideology. Neoclassical economics, he says, is a just-world theory, one that posits that not only do good people get what they deserve but those who suffer deserve to suffer. He says this model is a warrant for inflicting pain. If we continue down a path of mounting scarcities, along with economic stagnation or decline, this neoclassical model is ominous. It could be used to justify repression in an effort to sustain a vision that does not correspond to the real world.
<...>
There are two core doctrines in economics, Offer said. One is individual self-interest. The other is the invisible hand, the idea that the pursuit of individual self-interest aggregates or builds up for the good of society as a whole. This is a logical proposition that has never been proven. If we take the centrality of self-interest in economics, then it is not clear on what basis economics should be promoting the public good. This is not a norm that is part of economics itself; in fact, economics tells us the opposite. Economics tells us that everything anyone says should be motivated by strategic self-interest. And when economists use the word strategic they mean cheating.
<...>
One of the issues here is when those in authority, whether political, academic or civic, are expounding their doctrines through Enlightenment idioms and we must ask, is this being done in good faith? he said. And here I think the genuine insight provided by the economics of opportunism is that we cannot assume it is being done in good faith.
When I hear Republicans in the United States say that taking away peoples food stamps will do them good I ask, what do you know that allows you to say this? This rhetoric invokes the Enlightenment model. We all use it. It is improvement by means of reason. But Enlightenment discourse should not be taken at face value. We have to again ask whether it is being carried out in good faith.