Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Tue Mar 4, 2014, 07:11 AM Mar 2014

How a Bad-ass California Mayor is Taking on Big Banks

http://www.alternet.org/economy/how-bad-ass-california-mayor-taking-big-banks


In a nearly $13 billion settlement with the US Justice Department in November 2013, JPMorgan Chase admitted that it, along with every other large US bank, had engaged in mortgage fraud as a routine business practice, sowing the seeds of the mortgage meltdown. JPMorgan and other megabanks have now been caught in over a dozen major frauds, including LIBOR-rigging and bid-rigging; yet no prominent banker has gone to jail. Meanwhile, nearly a quarter of all mortgages nationally remain underwater (meaning the balance owed exceeds the current value of the home), sapping homeowners’ budgets, the housing market and the economy. Since the banks, the courts and the federal government have failed to give adequate relief to homeowners, some cities are taking matters into their own hands.

Gayle McLaughlin, the bold mayor of Richmond, California, has gone where no woman dared go before, threatening to take underwater mortgages by eminent domain from Wall Street banks and renegotiate them on behalf of beleaguered homeowners. A member of the Green Party, which takes no corporate campaign money, she proved her mettle standing up to Chevron, which dominates the Richmond landscape. But the banks have signaled that if Richmond or another city tries the eminent domain gambit, they will rush to court seeking an injunction. Their grounds: an unconstitutional taking of private property and breach of contract.

How to refute those charges? There is a way; but to understand it, you first need to grasp the massive fraud perpetrated on homeowners. It is how you were duped into paying more than your house was worth; why you should not just turn in your keys or short-sell your underwater property away; why you should urge Congress not to legalize the MERS scheme; and why you should insist that your local government help you acquire title to your home at a fair price if the banks won’t. That is exactly what Richmond and other city councils are attempting to do through the tool of eminent domain.

The Securitization Fraud that Collapsed the Housing Market

One settlement after another has now been reached with investors and government agencies for the sale of “faulty mortgage bonds,” including a suit brought by Fannie and Freddie that settled in October 2013 for $5.1 billion. “Faulty” is a euphemism for “fraudulent.” It means that mortgages subject to securitization have “clouded” or “defective” titles. And that means the banks and real estate trusts claiming title as owners or nominees don’t actually have title – or have standing to enjoin the city from proceeding with eminent domain. They can’t claim an unconstitutional taking of property because they can’t prove they own the property, and they can’t claim breach of contract because they weren’t the real parties in interest to the mortgages (the parties putting up the money).
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How a Bad-ass California Mayor is Taking on Big Banks (Original Post) xchrom Mar 2014 OP
she has the moral high ground on her side tomm2thumbs Mar 2014 #1
and hope she doesn't fly on any small planes...... lastlib Mar 2014 #11
"Only in California...." yuiyoshida Mar 2014 #2
That is awesome. I wish there were more populist advocates in elected office. loudsue Mar 2014 #3
Go after the big banks OLDMDDEM Mar 2014 #4
Corporations use Eminent Domain to seize private property for their own use PeoViejo Mar 2014 #5
Thanks For Sharing cantbeserious Mar 2014 #6
I am not a "hater" when it comes to POTUS. I am amazed at the disconnect from candidate Obama. dotymed Mar 2014 #7
I too am an FDR Democrat.... AnneD Mar 2014 #9
100% agree AnneD. dotymed Mar 2014 #10
When the government no longer represents the people.... AnneD Mar 2014 #13
Sometimes I think we just need a SECOND party! lastlib Mar 2014 #12
Gayle is a Green. roody Mar 2014 #8
HUGE K & R !!! - THANK YOU !!! WillyT Mar 2014 #14
The casino has taken over everything PowerToThePeople Mar 2014 #15
Even if the courts would allow this, which they won't, Freddie Stubbs Mar 2014 #16

tomm2thumbs

(13,297 posts)
1. she has the moral high ground on her side
Tue Mar 4, 2014, 08:17 AM
Mar 2014

hope she is able to secure some deals and start a wave... small ripples grow bigger with a little momentum applied

loudsue

(14,087 posts)
3. That is awesome. I wish there were more populist advocates in elected office.
Tue Mar 4, 2014, 09:01 AM
Mar 2014

I'm sick of "populist" being a nasty word on the news shows and among our elected officials.

OLDMDDEM

(1,575 posts)
4. Go after the big banks
Tue Mar 4, 2014, 09:30 AM
Mar 2014

I am so glad I read this article. The bib banks have gotten away with "murder" since the fraud of the last decade. I realize money talks helping alleged perps walk, but at least eminent domain is a way around them being able to come after the little guy. I hope mor cities and towns decide this is a way to help their townfolk.

 

PeoViejo

(2,178 posts)
5. Corporations use Eminent Domain to seize private property for their own use
Tue Mar 4, 2014, 09:39 AM
Mar 2014

...with the help of public officials, so why can't public officials do the same for the private property owner?

dotymed

(5,610 posts)
7. I am not a "hater" when it comes to POTUS. I am amazed at the disconnect from candidate Obama.
Tue Mar 4, 2014, 09:55 AM
Mar 2014

I did think (as IMO, the majority of voters did) that we were electing a populist President. The candidate sure signaled and
even SAID that he was a populist (transparency, economic help for the underclass, higher taxes for the wealthy, single payer, etc.) instead we have gotten half measures that have benefitted the wealthy over the majority.

Where did the FDR Democratic party go? It merged with the gop and nationally we have one corporatist party.
Imagine what could be accomplished with a populist POTUS armed with executive orders and a bully pulpit.
Much more than health insurance company fodder, increased drone killings, on and on...very profitable for all except US.

AnneD

(15,774 posts)
9. I too am an FDR Democrat....
Tue Mar 4, 2014, 10:12 AM
Mar 2014

My vote for Obama has been a regret for me. I say vote because I voted Green the last presidential election. I still vote Dem when I really think the candidate will work for us but if not, I have no problem going Green. We need a third party in this country. Neither party represents we the people anymore.

AnneD

(15,774 posts)
13. When the government no longer represents the people....
Tue Mar 4, 2014, 10:34 AM
Mar 2014

revolution is the only redress; either peacefully via political means or by violence. This is our last hope. I feel abandoned by both parties at this point and this is my last stand.

lastlib

(23,251 posts)
12. Sometimes I think we just need a SECOND party!
Tue Mar 4, 2014, 10:30 AM
Mar 2014

Sometimes you can't tell the D's from the R's, and THAT's the crux of the problem. Congress, with a few notable exceptions, is a wholly-owned subsidiary.

Freddie Stubbs

(29,853 posts)
16. Even if the courts would allow this, which they won't,
Tue Mar 4, 2014, 11:57 AM
Mar 2014

this would cause a massive drop in property values in the city. No bank would loan money to anyone wanting to buy a house there.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How a Bad-ass California ...