General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMeet The 7 Democrats Who Just Voted Down A Civil Rights Nominee For Supporting Civil Rights
By Ian Millhiser
Debo Adegbile, who previously served as the acting head of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, is one of the nations top civil rights attorneys. Hes also a leading expert on voting rights who twice defended the Voting Rights Act before the Supreme Court the first time successfully. He was, in other words, an ideal candidate to lead the Justice Departments Civil Rights Division the division which, among other things, oversees the federal governments voting rights work in an era where conservative state lawmakers are currently waging a widespread campaign to prevent demographic groups that tend to vote for Democrats from casting a ballot.
And yet, the Senate just voted his nomination down, thanks to seven Democrats. The Democrats who opposed Adegbiles confirmation are Sens. Bob Casey (D-PA), Chris Coons (D-DE), Joe Donnelly (D-IN), Heidi Heitkamp (D-ND), Joe Manchin (D-WV), Mark Pryor (D-AR) and John Walsh (D-MT).
Although most of these senators have yet to offer an explanation for their votes and the Senate offices ThinkProgress contacted shortly after the vote were not especially forthcoming it is likely that their votes were motivated by a campaign to disqualify Adegbile because of a high profile case the NAACP LDF participated in during his time with that organization.
In 2008, a federal appeals court unanimously held with two Reagan appointees on the panel that procedures used during a convicted cop killer named Mumia Abu-Jamals death penalty hearing violated the Constitution. Specifically, the panel of predominantly Republican judges concluded that the trial judge gave the jury a confusing form that could have been read to require a death sentence unless every single juror agreed to a life sentence. The NAACP LDF filed an amicus brief on Abu-Jamals behalf.
- more -
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2014/03/05/3364851/meet-the-7-democrats-who-just-voted-down-a-civil-rights-nominee-for-supporting-civil-rights/
BanzaiBonnie
(3,621 posts)Last edited Wed Mar 5, 2014, 04:50 PM - Edit history (1)
a lawyer was dismissed from taking one job, because he's previously been conscientious at his job?
frazzled
(18,402 posts)in itself, and even less so if one looks at the breadth of his career. Has the same standard been applied to other nominations? Has a heinous past client been used against any other judicial nominees?
Let's take a look:
Ferguson might have been executed earlier, but his attorneys, one of whom was later rewarded with a position of unparalleled influence in the U.S. government, argued Ferguson was mentally ill and dragged out the process for years.
What kind of person would defend a butcher with the blood of eight people on his hands?
It was Chief Justice John Roberts, who devoted 25 pro bono hours to Fergusons case when he was working in private practice. Later, when Roberts was nominated to the nations highest court, his work on the Ferguson case wasnt seen by anyone as a hinderance. A good lawyer like John Roberts may not share the clients priorities, they might not share the clients worldview, what theyre committed to is the application of rights under law, says Charles Geyh, an expert on legal ethics and professor at the Indiana University School of Law.
Not everyone is willing to extend that view to Debo Adegbile, President Obamas nominee to head the civil rights division at the Department of Justice.
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/obama-pick-targeted-where-others-were-spared
BanzaiBonnie
(3,621 posts)I was so disgusted at the dismissal of another of our President's picks, I missed that my word was changed to a word with an entirely different meaning.
frazzled
(18,402 posts)I'm depressed about it too. We're on the same page.
I have learned not to let auto correct be operative on my computer. But on the iPad, oy ... don't know how to turn it off, and it changes every second word you type. I try not to even answer emails on that thing, because people receiving them will wonder what the heck I've been drinking!
Cheers!
reddread
(6,896 posts)octoberlib
(14,971 posts)voted with the Democratic majority on anything in the past year? I'm sick of these three and Landreiu.
benld74
(9,904 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)By Ian Millhiser
A fundraising email sent by Sen. Heidi Heitkamp (D-ND) this afternoon claims that (i)f theres one thing we should all be able to agree on, its that every American deserves the right to vote. Its one of our most basic rights but right now its under attack.
Heitkamp is correct. Indeed, one of the ways that voting rights are currently under attack is that Sen. Heidi Heitkamp (D-ND) voted on Wednesday to block Debo Adegbile, the attorney who twice defended the Voting Rights Act in the Supreme Court, from being confirmed to head the Justice Departments Civil Rights Division.
The vote wrapped up shortly after noon today. A copy of Heitkamps email obtained by ThinkProgress is timestamped Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 1:11 PM, which means that Heitkamp waited about one hour after she opposed one of the nations leading voting rights advocates to send out an email trying to fundraise off of her support for legislation seeking to restore voting rights for all Americans. Ironically, the reason why this legislation is necessary is because five conservative justices rejected Mr. Adegbiles arguments seeking to preserve a key provision of the Voting Rights Act.
A screenshot of Heitkamps email is copied below:
- more -
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2014/03/05/3365481/one-hour-after-opposing-top-voting-rights-lawyer-senator-fundraises-off-voting-rights/
alp227
(32,027 posts)and clearly voting yes would tick off a LOT of people there.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) switched his vote to 'no' at the end, in order to reserve his right to bring up the nomination again.
"We knew it was going to be a close vote, one way or another," Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) told TPM. "I'm hopeful that [he] will come up again. I'm disappointed that [the vote failed]."
Republicans used the occasion to bash the president.
"This is an embarrassment for President Obama and the Democrats who thought it was a good idea to nominate a convicted cop-killers most ardent defender to head a DOJ Department and failed," said Reince Priebus, the chair of the Republican National Committee.
The Democrats who voted against cloture on the nomination were Sens. Joe Donnelly (IN), Heidi Heitkamp (ND), Joe Manchin (WV), Mark Pryor (AR), John Walsh (MT), Coons, Casey and (for procedural reasons) Reid.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/senate-democrats-torpedo-obama-s-top-civil-rights-nominee