General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsObama to Netanyahu: Israel faces Int’l Sanctions over “Permanent Occupation of West Bank”
Last edited Thu Mar 6, 2014, 09:57 PM - Edit history (1)
(This is a fascinating read)Published on Wednesday, March 5, 2014 by Informed Comment
Obama to Netanyahu: Israel faces Intl Sanctions over Permanent Occupation of West Bank
by Juan Cole
Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahus visit to Washington, D.C., this week was even more of a disaster for him than might have been expected.
It did not help that the Crimea crisis had broken out, which rather cast a bad light on one country militarily occupying parts of another. Most observers in Europe and even some in the US could see the hypocrisy of the US denouncing Russian troops in Crimea but supporting Israeli troops in Hebron.
-----snip-----
Obama, who has been ambushed repeatedly by Netanyahu during their joint press conferences, this time ambushed Netanyahu instead, with an interview with the fanatically pro-Israel former Israeli prison guard at a notorious prison camp for Palestinians, Jeffrey Goldberg. Obama said,
Obamas phrase manage this the referent is the Israeli occupation of the West Bank, which has been going on since 1967 and has now taken on an illegal character (youre not allowed in military occupation to flood your population into the occupied territory, nor to systematically confiscate property from the occupied population, nor to target civilians among them for punitive policies).
-------------snip------------
Goldberg speculated that Obama was issuing a veiled threat when he warned that the US cannot protect Israel from growing sanctions if Netanyahu continues down his present path. I dont think so. Obama could just have Samantha Powers decline to veto UN Security Council sanctions on Israel any time he liked. He wont do it, because the Israel lobbies would cause trouble for him with Congress if he did.
What Obama was more likely saying was that the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement to respond to Israeli colonialism against the Palestinians is unfolding in other venues where the US government doesnt have a veto. The US cannot force the European Union states to disregard EU law. It cannot forestall lawsuits by Palestinian concerns in Europe against European companies involved in helping occupy them. Moreover, now that Palestine is a non-member observer state at the UN (as a result of a UN general assembly vote that the US could not prevent), it could take Israel to the International Criminal Court over criminal Israel actions in the Occupied territories. Obama was simply observing that as the scales fall from the worlds eyes, Israel will be subject to sanctions, and the US government cannot do anything about it.
Netanyahu and his right wing political coalition are in denial. They are addicted to occupation. Obama tried to stage an intervention. But addicts are not easy to persuade.
http://www.commondreams.org/further/2014/03/05-0
1000words
(7,051 posts)Thanks for posting.
Rec
starroute
(12,977 posts)KoKo
(84,711 posts)go to a 404 Not found on this Website...
It's a good read. If it comes back up on CD with workable link...I will kick with the link..
Very interesting
KoKo
(84,711 posts)They've been in and out the last couple of days for those trying to access the link for rest of article.
It give message that "link cannot be found or other denial of service."
Hopefully they will get it corrected. The article is an interesting read.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)2banon
(7,321 posts)also I have been denied access.
2banon
(7,321 posts)I like Juan's perspective, but in this case I think his tea leaf reading is off the mark a bit. Unless he's got some inside information that Obama actually said something to that effect more directly and specifically.. (?) in regards to sanctions. In fact he seems to scoff at the notion due to obvious reasons.. Haven't been following the sanctions movement, though so there's something more to this I'm not aware of.