Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
Wed Mar 5, 2014, 05:13 PM Mar 2014

Obama to Netanyahu: Israel faces Int’l Sanctions over “Permanent Occupation of West Bank”

Last edited Thu Mar 6, 2014, 09:57 PM - Edit history (1)

(This is a fascinating read)

Published on Wednesday, March 5, 2014 by Informed Comment
Obama to Netanyahu: Israel faces Int’l Sanctions over “Permanent Occupation of West Bank”
by Juan Cole

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s visit to Washington, D.C., this week was even more of a disaster for him than might have been expected.

It did not help that the Crimea crisis had broken out, which rather cast a bad light on one country militarily occupying parts of another. Most observers in Europe and even some in the US could see the hypocrisy of the US denouncing Russian troops in Crimea but supporting Israeli troops in Hebron.

-----snip-----

Obama, who has been ambushed repeatedly by Netanyahu during their joint press conferences, this time ambushed Netanyahu instead, with an interview with the fanatically pro-Israel former Israeli prison guard at a notorious prison camp for Palestinians, Jeffrey Goldberg. Obama said,

“There comes a point where you can’t manage this anymore, and then you start having to make very difficult choices . . . Do you resign yourself to what amounts to a permanent occupation of the West Bank? Is that the character of Israel as a state for a long period of time? Do you perpetuate, over the course of a decade or two decades, more and more restrictive policies in terms of Palestinian movement? Do you place restrictions on Arab-Israelis in ways that run counter to Israel’s traditions?”

Obama’s phrase “manage this” the referent is the Israeli occupation of the West Bank, which has been going on since 1967 and has now taken on an illegal character (you’re not allowed in military occupation to flood your population into the occupied territory, nor to systematically confiscate property from the occupied population, nor to target civilians among them for punitive policies).

-------------snip------------

Goldberg speculated that Obama was issuing a veiled threat when he warned that the US cannot protect Israel from growing sanctions if Netanyahu continues down his present path. I don’t think so. Obama could just have Samantha Powers decline to veto UN Security Council sanctions on Israel any time he liked. He won’t do it, because the Israel lobbies would cause trouble for him with Congress if he did.

What Obama was more likely saying was that the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement to respond to Israeli colonialism against the Palestinians is unfolding in other venues where the US government doesn’t have a veto. The US cannot force the European Union states to disregard EU law. It cannot forestall lawsuits by Palestinian concerns in Europe against European companies involved in helping occupy them. Moreover, now that Palestine is a non-member observer state at the UN (as a result of a UN general assembly vote that the US could not prevent), it could take Israel to the International Criminal Court over criminal Israel actions in the Occupied territories. Obama was simply observing that as the scales fall from the world’s eyes, Israel will be subject to sanctions, and the US government cannot do anything about it.

Netanyahu and his right wing political coalition are in denial. They are addicted to occupation. Obama tried to stage an intervention. But addicts are not easy to persuade.

http://www.commondreams.org/further/2014/03/05-0
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama to Netanyahu: Israel faces Int’l Sanctions over “Permanent Occupation of West Bank” (Original Post) KoKo Mar 2014 OP
Interesting 1000words Mar 2014 #1
The link didn't work for me -- try this one starroute Mar 2014 #2
Common Dreams is having Outages the last few days...and links KoKo Mar 2014 #4
K & R malaise Mar 2014 #3
BTW: Common Dreams Link is having Problems with Access KoKo Mar 2014 #5
Try this link: bemildred Mar 2014 #6
Koko, I don't see the quote in the article (from your header) 2banon Mar 2014 #7
Nevermind, I got it. Just found a good link to Juan Cole's article 2banon Mar 2014 #8

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
4. Common Dreams is having Outages the last few days...and links
Thu Mar 6, 2014, 09:59 PM
Mar 2014

go to a 404 Not found on this Website...

It's a good read. If it comes back up on CD with workable link...I will kick with the link..

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
5. BTW: Common Dreams Link is having Problems with Access
Thu Mar 6, 2014, 10:25 PM
Mar 2014

They've been in and out the last couple of days for those trying to access the link for rest of article.

It give message that "link cannot be found or other denial of service."

Hopefully they will get it corrected. The article is an interesting read.

 

2banon

(7,321 posts)
8. Nevermind, I got it. Just found a good link to Juan Cole's article
Thu Mar 6, 2014, 11:02 PM
Mar 2014

I like Juan's perspective, but in this case I think his tea leaf reading is off the mark a bit. Unless he's got some inside information that Obama actually said something to that effect more directly and specifically.. (?) in regards to sanctions. In fact he seems to scoff at the notion due to obvious reasons.. Haven't been following the sanctions movement, though so there's something more to this I'm not aware of.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama to Netanyahu: Israe...