General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIf you eliminate rational reasons for why an act happened...
does that leave only irrational reasons for why that act happened?
Please discuss.
Note: this post is not in regards to any current news item. I just want to explore this point with my fellow DUers.
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)elleng
(130,918 posts)bemildred
(90,061 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Why not?
Should we objectify subjectivity, or what?
bemildred
(90,061 posts)I cannot think of a response that is both coherent and witty enough.
Serves me right, I suppose.
Make7
(8,543 posts)yawnmaster
(2,812 posts)Like pi or the square root of two.
Squinch
(50,950 posts)xfundy
(5,105 posts)You win.
xfundy
(5,105 posts)i mean, you can't get more rational than that, or BabyJesus will torture you in hell for all eternity. Right?
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)It depends.
Sometimes things happen for irrational reasons.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)Like rationality, even logic has different meanings to different individuals. All Vulcans would do is argue, like any other sentient species.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]If you're not committed to anything, you're just taking up space.
Gregory Peck, Mirage (1965)[/center][/font][hr]
Squinch
(50,950 posts)SomethingFishy
(4,876 posts)Sherlock Holmes. (Sir Arthur Conan Doyle).