Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhen Regulation Threatens, Bankers Predict Doom For Main Street
When Regulation Threatens, Bankers Predict Doom For Main Street
by Jesse Eisinger
<...>
No sooner had that issue been resolved when Washington convulsed with a new crisis, now upon us: the C.L.O. panic...The House held a hearing last week to examine the issue. American Banker, a trade publication, ran an article with a headline that succinctly summarized the industrys view: How Dodd-Frank Might Kill the C.L.O. Market.
<...>
Collateralized loan obligations, as the acronym is known, are bundles of loans, usually made to junk-rated companies. They use the same techniques as collateralized debt obligations, which were often made up of subprime mortgage investments and were the rotten core of the financial crisis. C.L.O.s caused billions in losses for banks during the market panic of 2008, but most recovered strongly and memories faded. Junk-rated companies rallied, and C.L.O.s roared back.
Under the Volcker Rule, which prevents banks from making speculative investments or owning large pieces of hedge funds or private equity firms, some C.L.O. holdings might be prohibited. Some C.L.O.s own securities or bonds, and those are considered more speculative. (In a regulatory quirk, bonds and loans get different regulatory treatments.) Some C.L.O.s give certain investors the ability to remove the manager that makes the C.L.O.s investment decisions. That could be construed as a form of ownership control, which would bar banks from participating under a strict construction of the Volcker Rule.
The banking industry has been making loud noises about how the uncertainty could have dire consequences. As with the TruPs ruckus, the big banks have defended their interests in the name of smaller and more sympathetic entities. According to the banking lobby and its friends in Congress, any threat to the C.L.O. market is actually a dagger pointed at midsize businesses, which will have trouble finding capital as a result. In written testimony to the House subcommittee, a United States Chamber of Commerce representative expressed serious concerns that the regulators had failed to take into account the impact of the Volcker Rule upon the capital formation of Main Street businesses, adding ominously that it may only be the first wave of capital formation problems that may crop up as a result of the Volcker Rule....this skirmish is largely about preserving a market for the largest banks. Just three too big to fail banks JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup and Wells Fargo account for 71 percent of bank C.L.O. holdings, according to Better Markets, the banking reform group. And the large banks get fees from creating the deals.
- more -
http://www.propublica.org/thetrade/item/when-regulation-threatens-bankers-predict-doom-for-main-street
by Jesse Eisinger
<...>
No sooner had that issue been resolved when Washington convulsed with a new crisis, now upon us: the C.L.O. panic...The House held a hearing last week to examine the issue. American Banker, a trade publication, ran an article with a headline that succinctly summarized the industrys view: How Dodd-Frank Might Kill the C.L.O. Market.
<...>
Collateralized loan obligations, as the acronym is known, are bundles of loans, usually made to junk-rated companies. They use the same techniques as collateralized debt obligations, which were often made up of subprime mortgage investments and were the rotten core of the financial crisis. C.L.O.s caused billions in losses for banks during the market panic of 2008, but most recovered strongly and memories faded. Junk-rated companies rallied, and C.L.O.s roared back.
Under the Volcker Rule, which prevents banks from making speculative investments or owning large pieces of hedge funds or private equity firms, some C.L.O. holdings might be prohibited. Some C.L.O.s own securities or bonds, and those are considered more speculative. (In a regulatory quirk, bonds and loans get different regulatory treatments.) Some C.L.O.s give certain investors the ability to remove the manager that makes the C.L.O.s investment decisions. That could be construed as a form of ownership control, which would bar banks from participating under a strict construction of the Volcker Rule.
The banking industry has been making loud noises about how the uncertainty could have dire consequences. As with the TruPs ruckus, the big banks have defended their interests in the name of smaller and more sympathetic entities. According to the banking lobby and its friends in Congress, any threat to the C.L.O. market is actually a dagger pointed at midsize businesses, which will have trouble finding capital as a result. In written testimony to the House subcommittee, a United States Chamber of Commerce representative expressed serious concerns that the regulators had failed to take into account the impact of the Volcker Rule upon the capital formation of Main Street businesses, adding ominously that it may only be the first wave of capital formation problems that may crop up as a result of the Volcker Rule....this skirmish is largely about preserving a market for the largest banks. Just three too big to fail banks JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup and Wells Fargo account for 71 percent of bank C.L.O. holdings, according to Better Markets, the banking reform group. And the large banks get fees from creating the deals.
- more -
http://www.propublica.org/thetrade/item/when-regulation-threatens-bankers-predict-doom-for-main-street
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 501 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
When Regulation Threatens, Bankers Predict Doom For Main Street (Original Post)
ProSense
Mar 2014
OP
The Magistrate
(95,247 posts)1. And When Not Regulated, Ma'am, They Ruin Main Street
"Heads I win, tails you lose."
mylye2222
(2,992 posts)2. When no regulation.... they will destroy "Main-full -Earth"!!!!
I endorse this post.
LiberalEsto
(22,845 posts)3. "Predict" or "Plan"? nt
ProSense
(116,464 posts)4. Kick! n/t