General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsChicago bans puppy mill sales in pet stores
Anti-puppy mill legislation backed by animal advocates, City Clerk Susana Mendoza approved by the Chicago City Council
The City Council today passed a landmark piece of legislation to ban the retail sale of commercially bred dogs, cats and rabbits in the City of Chicago.
The Companion Animal & Consumer Protection Ordinance, which will require retail pet stores to source animals only from shelters and other humane not-for-profit organizations, was backed by championed by Chicago City Clerk Susana A. Mendoza and Alds. Joe Moreno, 1st Ward, Scott Waguespack, 32nd Ward, and Ameya Pawar, 47th Ward.
The ordinance was approved 49-1 in the City Council on Wednesday.
Our legislation cuts off a pipeline animals from the horrendous puppy mill industry and instead moves the City to a retail pet sales model that focuses on adopting out the many, many homeless animals in need of homes in this City, said Clerk Mendoza. The Midwest, and specifically the states surrounding Illinois, is at the very center of the puppy mill industry. I expect that this overwhelming vote today will create a flood of support for similar legislation throughout the rest of the country.
The legislation was unanimously approved by the Committee on Licensing & Consumer Protection on March 4. It will go into effect one year from today to allow retails to readjust their current business model. The ordinance was drafted in partnership with The Puppy Mill Project Chicago and supported by the Office of the Mayor Rahm Emanuel, Chicago Animal Care & Control and the Department of Business Affairs & Consumer Protection, as well as local and national not-for-profit organizations such as Best Friends Animal Society, The Humane Society of the United States, the ASPCA and PAWS Chicago and many others. Clerk Mendoza said animal advocacy was the driving force behind the legislation.
We have people like Cari Meyers from The Puppy Mill Project Chicago and many others to thank for this new law. We have them to thank for pushing Chicago in a new direction toward more humane and progressive animal welfare laws, she said.
Chicago joins 45 other municipalities in North America, including San Diego; Los Angeles; Toronto; Austin, Texas; and Albuquerque, New Mexico, that have passed similar laws.
(Thank you City Clerk Susana Mendoza)
http://www.chicagonow.com/raining-cats-dogs/2014/03/chicago-bans-puppy-mill-sales-in-pet-stores/
Gidney N Cloyd
(19,838 posts)flvegan
(64,408 posts)RebelOne
(30,947 posts)spin
(17,493 posts)Great news and great photo!
valerief
(53,235 posts)pnwmom
(108,978 posts)that end up in our shelters. They should be instituting spay and neutering programs instead of off-loading their strays here.
Otherwise, we are just trading one problematic source of dogs for another.
Also, I'm wondering why they think that people who go to pet stores will want to pay a premium to buy adult mutts from them that the purchaser knows originally came from a humane society, pound, or rescue? Why wouldn't they just go to the humane society, pound, or rescue?
And where do they think most of the dogs come from that are in the pounds now? Puppy mills. . . since most reputable breeders make purchasers sign contracts allowing them to have the dog back if they have to be given up for any reason . .
DainBramaged
(39,191 posts)KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)This is good news!
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)They don't sound like much more than feel good bullshit to me.
Anyone?
Doesn't sound like a "ban" when I read it. Maybe I'm just not smart enough...
Beringia
(4,316 posts)for C) A retail store can sell a dog, cat or rabbit that has been obtained from a facility operated by the local, state or federal government or from a humane society.
for D) the retail store must give the medical and other history of the animal
----------------------------------------------------------
Section 2
Subsection C
Exemptions.
The restrictions on retailers set forth in [font color=blue] subsection (b) [/font color] of this section shall not apply to any entity listed in paragraphs (1) or (2) of subsection (b) of this section, or to any veterinary hospital or clinic licensed pursuant to the Veterinary Medicine and Surgery Practice Act of 2004, codified at 225 ILCS 115.
-----------------------------------------------------
[font color=blue] Subsection b [/font color=blue]
(b)
Restrictions on the retail sale of animals. A retailer may offer for sale only those dogs, cats or rabbits that the retailer has obtained from:
(1) an animal control center, animal care facility, kennel, pound or training facility operated by any subdivision of local, state or federal government; or
(2) a humane society or rescue organization.
--------------------------
Section 2
Subsection D
(d) Disclosures required. Any retailer who offers for sale a dog, cat or rabbit shall make the following disclosures to the customer about such animal:
(1) for each dog or cat: a written disclosure meeting all of the requirements set forth in Sections 3.5 or 3.15, as applicable, of the Animal Welfare Act, codified at 225 ILCS 605; and,
(2) for each rabbit: (i) the breed, approximate age, sex and color of the animal; (ii) the date and description of any inoculation or medical treatment that the animal received while under the posse
ssion of the retailer; (iii)the name and address of the location where the was born, rescued, relinquished or impounded; and (iv)if the was returned by a customer, the date of and reason for the return.