Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Beringia

(4,316 posts)
Thu Mar 6, 2014, 11:22 PM Mar 2014

Chicago bans puppy mill sales in pet stores



Anti-puppy mill legislation backed by animal advocates, City Clerk Susana Mendoza approved by the Chicago City Council


The City Council today passed a landmark piece of legislation to ban the retail sale of commercially bred dogs, cats and rabbits in the City of Chicago.

The Companion Animal & Consumer Protection Ordinance, which will require retail pet stores to source animals only from shelters and other humane not-for-profit organizations, was backed by championed by Chicago City Clerk Susana A. Mendoza and Alds. Joe Moreno, 1st Ward, Scott Waguespack, 32nd Ward, and Ameya Pawar, 47th Ward.
The ordinance was approved 49-1 in the City Council on Wednesday.

“Our legislation cuts off a pipeline animals from the horrendous puppy mill industry and instead moves the City to a retail pet sales model that focuses on adopting out the many, many homeless animals in need of homes in this City,” said Clerk Mendoza. “The Midwest, and specifically the states surrounding Illinois, is at the very center of the puppy mill industry. I expect that this overwhelming vote today will create a flood of support for similar legislation throughout the rest of the country.”

The legislation was unanimously approved by the Committee on Licensing & Consumer Protection on March 4. It will go into effect one year from today to allow retails to readjust their current business model. The ordinance was drafted in partnership with The Puppy Mill Project – Chicago and supported by the Office of the Mayor Rahm Emanuel, Chicago Animal Care & Control and the Department of Business Affairs & Consumer Protection, as well as local and national not-for-profit organizations such as Best Friends Animal Society, The Humane Society of the United States, the ASPCA and PAWS Chicago and many others. Clerk Mendoza said animal advocacy was the driving force behind the legislation.
“We have people like Cari Meyers from The Puppy Mill Project – Chicago and many others to thank for this new law. We have them to thank for pushing Chicago in a new direction toward more humane and progressive animal welfare laws,” she said.

Chicago joins 45 other municipalities in North America, including San Diego; Los Angeles; Toronto; Austin, Texas; and Albuquerque, New Mexico, that have passed similar laws.

(Thank you City Clerk Susana Mendoza)





http://www.chicagonow.com/raining-cats-dogs/2014/03/chicago-bans-puppy-mill-sales-in-pet-stores/


15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Chicago bans puppy mill sales in pet stores (Original Post) Beringia Mar 2014 OP
K&R Gidney N Cloyd Mar 2014 #1
Nice work. flvegan Mar 2014 #2
Thae is good news. I hope other cities follow suit. n/t RebelOne Mar 2014 #3
Great news. (n/t) spin Mar 2014 #4
K&R ReRe Mar 2014 #5
Bravo! This needs to spread. nt valerief Mar 2014 #6
Next we should stop importing dogs from Mexico and other countries pnwmom Mar 2014 #7
One down too many to go DainBramaged Mar 2014 #8
So many more to go. People need to be educated. The AKC needs to be marginalized. KittyWampus Mar 2014 #9
Every journey starts with a first step in the right direction. MoonRiver Mar 2014 #13
Good! nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #10
Can someone who has actually read this "ban" explain Section 2, subsections C and D to me? cherokeeprogressive Mar 2014 #11
Here is what I interpret Beringia Mar 2014 #12
Alabama A.G. sues Chicago on behalf of Alabama puppy mills. PowerToThePeople Mar 2014 #14
That's great news...knr joeybee12 Mar 2014 #15

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
7. Next we should stop importing dogs from Mexico and other countries
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 12:31 AM
Mar 2014

that end up in our shelters. They should be instituting spay and neutering programs instead of off-loading their strays here.

Otherwise, we are just trading one problematic source of dogs for another.

Also, I'm wondering why they think that people who go to pet stores will want to pay a premium to buy adult mutts from them that the purchaser knows originally came from a humane society, pound, or rescue? Why wouldn't they just go to the humane society, pound, or rescue?

And where do they think most of the dogs come from that are in the pounds now? Puppy mills. . . since most reputable breeders make purchasers sign contracts allowing them to have the dog back if they have to be given up for any reason . .

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
11. Can someone who has actually read this "ban" explain Section 2, subsections C and D to me?
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 02:19 AM
Mar 2014

They don't sound like much more than feel good bullshit to me.

Anyone?

Doesn't sound like a "ban" when I read it. Maybe I'm just not smart enough...

Beringia

(4,316 posts)
12. Here is what I interpret
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 12:37 PM
Mar 2014
http://docs.chicityclerk.com/press/2014/20140205-pr-companion-animal-ordinance.pdf


for C) A retail store can sell a dog, cat or rabbit that has been obtained from a facility operated by the local, state or federal government or from a humane society.

for D) the retail store must give the medical and other history of the animal


----------------------------------------------------------


Section 2

Subsection C
Exemptions.
The restrictions on retailers set forth in [font color=blue] subsection (b) [/font color] of this section shall not apply to any entity listed in paragraphs (1) or (2) of subsection (b) of this section, or to any veterinary hospital or clinic licensed pursuant to the Veterinary Medicine and Surgery Practice Act of 2004, codified at 225 ILCS 115.



-----------------------------------------------------

[font color=blue] Subsection b [/font color=blue]

(b)
Restrictions on the retail sale of animals. A retailer may offer for sale only those dogs, cats or rabbits that the retailer has obtained from:
(1) an animal control center, animal care facility, kennel, pound or training facility operated by any subdivision of local, state or federal government; or
(2) a humane society or rescue organization.


--------------------------

Section 2
Subsection D

(d) Disclosures required. Any retailer who offers for sale a dog, cat or rabbit shall make the following disclosures to the customer about such animal:
(1) for each dog or cat: a written disclosure meeting all of the requirements set forth in Sections 3.5 or 3.15, as applicable, of the Animal Welfare Act, codified at 225 ILCS 605; and,
(2) for each rabbit: (i) the breed, approximate age, sex and color of the animal; (ii) the date and description of any inoculation or medical treatment that the animal received while under the posse
ssion of the retailer; (iii)the name and address of the location where the was born, rescued, relinquished or impounded; and (iv)if the was returned by a customer, the date of and reason for the return.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Chicago bans puppy mill s...