Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

deminks

(11,014 posts)
Thu Mar 6, 2014, 11:26 PM Mar 2014

So, was Bushco intention to keep the oil flowing? Or was it to keep the oil from flowing?

If the intention was to keep the oil flowing, why the lies?

And did we leave Iraq when they were socially ready? or when the oil was flowing again?

Cheney et al made a lot of money when the oil prices went up. A lot of money.

Rachel's show has left me with a lot of questions.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So, was Bushco intention to keep the oil flowing? Or was it to keep the oil from flowing? (Original Post) deminks Mar 2014 OP
Check out Greg Palast's book: Armed Madhouse KeepItReal Mar 2014 #1
This right here ^^^ It was all laid out by Palast years ago. Great book that I had to put ChisolmTrailDem Mar 2014 #3
If we--USA--can buy it cheap, it's better to keep ours in the ground. MADem Mar 2014 #2
K & R !!! WillyT Mar 2014 #4

KeepItReal

(7,769 posts)
1. Check out Greg Palast's book: Armed Madhouse
Thu Mar 6, 2014, 11:31 PM
Mar 2014
He tells about how Pro-OPEC and Anti-OPEC forces inside the Bush & Co. circle led to that clusterf*ck of a war and post-war ineptitude.



 

ChisolmTrailDem

(9,463 posts)
3. This right here ^^^ It was all laid out by Palast years ago. Great book that I had to put
Thu Mar 6, 2014, 11:54 PM
Mar 2014

down several times before I blew gaskets.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
2. If we--USA--can buy it cheap, it's better to keep ours in the ground.
Thu Mar 6, 2014, 11:52 PM
Mar 2014

It's like an insurance policy, a savings account. It's a good idea to "load up" when it can be had cheaply, and keep it stored as a contingency.

That said, if a corporation is in the business of helping OTHERS to get their oil out of the ground, it's a good bet for them to be helping others do just that. Ka-ching, ka-ching, and all that.

It costs a lot to get "crappy" oil to the customer--like shale oil, and some of the stuff in those older wells. Going to that form of oil depends on the price--if the price is high enough, it's worth it to get that stuff out of the ground. It's not such a bargain if the price of oil drops precipitously.

Then, too, there's the national security aspect. That's a separate issue and can override market forces.

As for leaving Iraq? We left Iraq when they refused to offer us a Status of Forces Agreement. These are standard when there's a "quid pro quo" happening--security in exchange for basing rights. That was a lucky break for us, IMO--we're well out of there.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So, was Bushco intention ...