General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSomething to make conservatives' heads explode regarding Lois Lerner . . .
There seems to be some widespread notion among conservatives that Lois Lerner was some kind of Obama loyalist within the IRS. But she was appointed to her post in 2005, by GEORGE W. BUSH!
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/05/14/irs-scandal-s-central-figure-lois-lerner-described-as-apolitical.html
And here is the official IRS announcement, from the IRS' website, of her appointment:
IR-2005-148, Dec. 22, 2005
WASHINGTON Lois G. Lerner has been selected as the director of the Exempt Organizations Division of the Internal Revenue Service. In this position, she will be responsible for administering and enforcing the tax laws that apply to more than 1.8 million organizations recognized by the IRS as exempt from tax.
Protecting the integrity of tax-exempt organizations is an important part of our enforcement program, said IRS Commissioner Mark W. Everson. Loiss background, including her work for the Federal Election Commission, qualifies her for this new assignment.
Before this appointment, Lerner had been the director of the Exempt Organizations Rulings & Agreements Division, where she was responsible for the EO determinations letter program, public guidance and technical assistance for IRS agents conducting examinations of tax-exempt organizations. Lerner came to the IRS in 2001 from the Federal Election Commission, where she was Associate General Counsel for Enforcement and Acting General Counsel. She replaces Martha Sullivan, who will retire from the IRS at the end of December.
Lois is an integral part of the EO team and has successfully increased the IRS presence in the exempt community, said Steven T. Miller, Commissioner of the IRS Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division, of which EO is a part. Her integrity, skills and judgment are exceptional and will allow us to continue to provide improved service and enhanced enforcement of the tax laws.
The tax-exempt sector of the economy had total assets of approximately $3.7 trillion in 2002, the latest year for which data are available, with revenues of $1.2 trillion.
Lerner will report to her new position in early January 2006. Joseph Urban, EO Senior Technical Advisor in Rulings & Agreements, will serve as acting director of EO Rulings & Agreements.
sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)I pointed this out to my Uncle. He replied with some delicately worded "you're full of shit" response and then I found her appointment online. He never responded but he sure stopped forwarding me the IRS shit.
proudretiredvet
(312 posts)What they are digging for is to try and find out if and/or who instructed her to pull some files and treat them differently or if she did this on her own.
I have no clue. This is a fishing expedition.
blm
(113,063 posts)with the 'appearance of a scandal' for actions that never happened.
Issa directed the audit to limit scrutiny ONLY to TeaParty/GOP groups. I have no doubt that when Lerner planted the question that started the ball rolling on this 'scandal' that it was at Issa's direction, too.
Skip Intro
(19,768 posts)That indicates to me she has something to tell that she's not telling. What other conclusion could one draw? Why else demand immunity for testimony?
I've been accused of failing to take the party line on this topic. Some people don't like taking an objective look. But if the parties were reversed here, with all else remaining the same, I'd be asking what she's hiding, and I'd be joined by many here. The federal government is answerable to the people they serve, regardless of party. So I have to wonder, what it is she would say with immunity that she won't say now?
--------
http://www.politico.com/story/2013/07/lois-lerner-irs-testimony-immunity-93684.html
Embattled IRS official Lois Lerner will not testify before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee unless shes given immunity from prosecution, her lawyer told POLITICO Tuesday.
They can obtain her testimony tomorrow by doing it the easy way
immunity, William W. Taylor III said in a phone interview. Thats the way to resolve all of this.
The comments reflect the hard-line approach Lerner, the former head of the IRS division that scrutinized conservative groups, and her legal team are taking in defending her role in the agencys scandal.
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)I suspect she is protecting a Repub or conservative. That was my assumption.
Your assumption obviously falls the other way.
markpkessinger
(8,401 posts). . . she was seeking to testify via private deposition, even without immunity.
An attorney for former Internal Revenue Service (IRS) official Lois Lerner unsuccessfully tried to secure a deal in which she would testify privately before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, the Wall Street Journal reported, leading to confusion over whether she would speak publicly about her role in the agency's targeting scandal.
Committee chairman Darrell Issa, R-Calif., announced on "Fox News Sunday" that Lerner would testify before his committee. Just a few minutes later, though, Lerner's attorney told Politico she planned to continue to assert her Fifth Amendment rights and would not testify.
According to the Journal, which reported on emails released by committee aides, Lerner was seeking the ability to give a private deposition even if she did not receive immunity for doing so in order to avoid the public attention. Then, insisted her attorney, William Taylor, she would have fulfilled all her obligations under the subpoena.
"I can tell you that we can probably move forward if the committee agrees that her appearance at a deposition would satisfy any obligation she has or would have to provide information in connection with this investigation," Taylor wrote on Friday. "For her to take the risk inherent in waiver (of her Fifth Amendment privilege), she would need assurance she is resolving her issues with the Committee." In another note to a committee aide, he confirmed she was willing to testify.
< . . . . >
Wounded Bear
(58,660 posts)I'd be interested in some confirmation on that little gem.
Notice how they worded that little snippet? Gotta love that "liberal media bias."