Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

struggle4progress

(118,293 posts)
Mon Mar 10, 2014, 10:39 PM Mar 2014

Gen Dempsey: 'Two years' to overcome Snowden leak

6 March 2014 Last updated at 19:07

... "We're working our way through that which we believe he has exfiltrated," Gen Dempsey said. "And we have, I think, a fairly significant amount of knowledge in that regard.

"The vast majority of <the pilfered documents> were related to our military capabilities, operations, tactics, techniques and procedures."

Gen Dempsey said the "magnitude of this challenge" suggested the task force would need to run for about two years.

"I suspect it could cost billions of dollars to overcome the loss of security that has been imposed on us," he said ...


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-26476079

This suggests there may be considerable evidence to support the 18 U.S. Code § 793(d) charges against Snowden -- and it unfortunately casts a different light on Snowden's claim that his leaks benefited "every society in the world," because §793(d) refers to Whoever, lawfully having .. access to .. information relating to the national defense which .. could be used .. to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully .. delivers .. the same to any person not entitled to receive it ... without regard to the question of provable harm done, the reason being, of course, that because foreign allegiances are not necessarily permanent, the present "advantage of any foreign nation" may translate into future "injury of the United States"

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
1. Amazing how few heads have rolled for allowing a mere contractor to have so much information
Mon Mar 10, 2014, 10:42 PM
Mar 2014

In any rational organization Clapper would have been "pour l'encouragement des autres" quite some time ago.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
2. I'm sorry, but this appears to be bogus.
Mon Mar 10, 2014, 10:48 PM
Mar 2014

Does anyone really think that the intelligence community would admit to the world that our capabilities were harmed to that extent by one young contractor?

It's just not believable, General Dempsey.

 

WillyT

(72,631 posts)
3. Aw... I Hope They're Gonna Be Ok... I Mean American Business Interests, Er... Natioanal Security...
Mon Mar 10, 2014, 10:50 PM
Mar 2014
Interests Are At Stake.


hatrack

(59,587 posts)
4. Eight years to "overcome" Iraq, 13 years to "overcome" Afghanistan . . .
Mon Mar 10, 2014, 10:50 PM
Mar 2014

What was your point, General? Was it all about . . . "damage"? "Challenges"? "Costs"?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Gen Dempsey: 'Two years' ...