Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy the GOP Cares About Poverty Now: Poor People are Looking More White
http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/why-gop-cares-about-poverty-nowThe face of poverty doesnt look the same anymore. And Republicans here in Washington seem to be taking note. They even seem to be caring. What, Paul Ryan, worry about the takers and not the makers? Maybe the war-on-the-war-on-poverty message has less to do with faulty data and midterm chances than something a lot simpler: the GOPs favorite all-purpose boogeyman the Welfare Queen has been replaced with a poor population that looks a lot more, well, white.
According to a recent report from the Census Bureau, one in three Americans can be expected to fall below the poverty line for at least six months, and more than 50% of all Americans between the ages of 25 and 60 have experienced at least a year of poverty. Whats different, now, is that two-thirds of those who fall below the poverty line now self-identify as white.
The GOP has responded to the ongoing pledge from Barack Obama and the Democrats to solve what the president calls the defining challenge of our time: income inequality. And theyve responded primarily by way of Ryans controversial poverty report, which focuses much of its attention on the sort of social science reports that liberal Democrats have relied on for years. The report tiredly bemoans the governments waste of social assistance programs, while praising some, like the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), which Obamas new budget proposes to expand.
That some leading Republicans would embrace the EITC isnt surprising; like Obamacare, this was a conservative idea that enjoys occasional Republican support, even though its viewed with extreme caution as excessively redistributive and prone to extreme abuse. Plus, every few years the minimum-wage debate re-emerges, and like clockwork, when Democrats say raise it, Republicans say E-I-T-C. This year, Sen Marco Rubio has proposed a version of the program nearly identical to Obamas, changing an annual credit to one received on a month-by-month basis. The EITC is appealing to Republicans because its a way to increase pay for low-income workers that doesnt burden their employers, which is more or less their argument against the minimum wage.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 623 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why the GOP Cares About Poverty Now: Poor People are Looking More White (Original Post)
xchrom
Mar 2014
OP
liberal N proud
(60,336 posts)1. They care so much they cut food stamps
And jobs programs or minimum wage.
The EITC is a way for them to keep people poor without giving them anything that might lift them out of poverty.
PotatoChip
(3,186 posts)2. I say raise the minimum wage -and- keep, perhaps even expand the EITC.
Both are helpful. This shouldn't be an either/or thing.