General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRand Paul’s Plan to Save Ukraine Is Completely Nuts
By Jonathan Chait
The biggest victim of the Ukraine crisis other than the Ukrainians themselves, of course may be Rand Paul. Since bursting onto the national scene four years ago, he has labored steadily and shrewdly first to shed his kook label, to make himself acceptable to the Partys establishment, and then to steadily tug its policy agenda in his direction. His high-profile attacks on the Obama administrations foreign policy agenda have excited conservatives and made traditional hawks do a slow boil.
But the return of a classic Cold War scenario has awkwardly exposed the dissonance between conservatives still-strong nationalist impulses and Pauls isolationism. Paul has an op-ed in Breitbarts Big Peace weakly making the case that Ronald Reagan was more dovish than you think, and pleading against his critics, splintering the party is not the route to victory. Concurrently, he has an op-ed in Time laying out his plan of action in Ukraine. The Time op-ed is where Paul truly lets loose his long-suppressed inner kook.
Everything about Pauls argument is weird. Part of the weirdness is conveyed by the prose, which is bereft of specific facts, repetitive, and reads as if it were run through a foreign-language translation program (This does not and should not require military action. No one in the U.S. is calling for this
I have said, and some have taken exception, that too many U.S. leaders still think in Cold War terms and are quick to 'tweak' the international community. This is true.)
The most uncomfortable thing about it is watching Paul attempt to steer the Ukraine debate toward appropriately Paul-esque solutions. He begins by endorsing the basic Republican talking points, which revolve around (1) general calls for more tough leadership by Obama; and (2) exporting more natural gas to western Europe. (Steve Mufson explains why the latter would have at best a delayed, very marginal effect.) But Paul adds other ideas, too. Some of them reflect an apparent inability to follow the news, like his ringing call for a boycott of the next G-8 summit in Russia:
Yeah, this already happened.
more
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2014/03/rand-pauls-plan-to-save-ukraine-completely-nuts.html
Gothmog
(145,293 posts)I really hope that this idiot is the GOP nominee
Jim__
(14,077 posts)No qualifiers required.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)Mass
(27,315 posts)the details in this piece are amazing, particularly those where he says that the US must show they are a world leader by being less involved. I do not disagree with the "less involved", but how does that make us more of a leader??
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,182 posts)Or Sarah Palin for that matter.
All these "Republicans to the rescue" is laughable.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)what Obama is already doing.
MurrayDelph
(5,299 posts)That's how you know it's his.