Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsExposed: The Corporations Behind the Law That May Let Trayvon Martin's Killer Go Free
http://www.thenation.com/article/167014/exposed-corporations-behind-law-may-let-trayvon-martins-killer-go-freehttp://www.thenation.com/sites/default/files/user/20/trayvon_martin_ap_img(1).jpg
Editor's Note: This article was first published by RepublicReport.org.
?
Its been widely reported today that the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), the shadowy corporate front group that unites state lawmakers with corporations to pass state laws favorable to corporate interests, helped pass the law that might allow Trayvon Martins killer, George Zimmerman, to escape prosecution. Floridas Stand Your Ground, the law that might help Zimmerman to claim self-defense (despite evidence to the contrary) is just one of many state laws that is nearly identical to ALECs model Castle Doctrine Act. The Florida senator who introduced the law, Durell Peadon, was also a member of ALEC. The law passed in 2005.
According to the Center for Media and Democracy, 98 percent of ALECs revenues come from corporations, corporate trade groups, and corporate foundations. Each member pays annual fees of between $7,000 and $25,000. ALEC is also supplemented by direct grants. We dont know all the details about all of ALECs funders and members. Heres a partial list of what we do know about the corporations and foundations who helped fund the group that drafted the law that keeps Trayvon Martins killer free and put more guns on our streets:
ALEC received $1.4 million in grants from ExxonMobil from 1998-2009.
It has also received grants from two Koch family-backed foundations: Charles G. Koch Foundation, the Claude R. Lambe Foundation.
ALEC has received grant money from the billionaire conservative and American Spectator publisher Richard Mellon Scaifes Allegheny Foundation and the Coors familys Castle Rock Foundation.
ALECs Private Enterprise Board members include executives from Bayer Corp., GlaxoSmithKline, Centerpoint360, Reynolds American, Wal-Mart Stores, Johnson & Johnson, PhRMA, American Bail Coalition, Kraft Foods, Inc., Pfizer Inc., DIAGEO, AT&T, Reed Elsevier, Inc., Peabody Energy, UPS, Koch Companies Public Sector, LLC, Altria Client Services, ExxonMobil, Salt River Project, and State Farm Insurance Co. Coca Cola also recently had an executive on ALECs board.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1400 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Exposed: The Corporations Behind the Law That May Let Trayvon Martin's Killer Go Free (Original Post)
xchrom
Mar 2012
OP
Ilsa
(61,707 posts)1. Liberals need to infiltrate ALEC.
We need to find a way to sponsor business owners to attend their conferences and gather data on them. I suspect there could be federally illegal crap being conspired at their events.
otohara
(24,135 posts)2. The Usual Suspects
assholes
exboyfil
(17,865 posts)3. Why is an oil company involved with funding
gun rights legislation? It makes no sense. I could see an owner of stock using his foundation to fund what he is interested in, but corporations have a fudiciary duty to act in their stockholder's best interest. Legislation to allow more drilling, refining, etc makes sense for the corporation, but this does not.