Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
Thu Mar 13, 2014, 02:49 PM Mar 2014

Romney's Bain Gets Away with Stealing eToys.com (he thinks)!

Yesterday, March 12, 2001, the Delaware Bankruptcy Court issued an order permitting Barry Gold, Paul Traub and the law firm of www.MNAT.com to wind down and close the eToys bankruptcy case(s). This is making Mitt Romney jump for joy that his worries about the "retroactive" era of August 2001, back to February 11, 1999 - are now (he hopes) finally coming to an end. Romney hopes that he and Bain get away 100% 'Scot Free' for Stage Stores, Kay Bee and eToys frauds.

However;

The greatest plans of mice and men don't always go the way the planner wishes.

Yours truly is an amoeba trying to swing the tigers tail to a stand still. It ain't easy taking down big sleazy; but I've been at it now for 13 years and I'm not going anywhere.

Because I've GOT THEM.

Just need one (just 1) honest public servant - to do their job.

[br]

[br]

Bankruptcy FRAUDS Massive


Stage Stores Bankruptcy Fraud includes Romney's law firm Traub, lying under oath.

In 2000, Romney owned Stage Stores (funded by fraud monies from Michael Milken and a corrupt judge whose wife was a partner of the deal {see Rolling Stone Taibbi story "Greed and Debt"}). Paul Traub and Barry Gold worked for Romney's Stage Store bankruptcy case under Michael Glazer (who is now the Stage Stores CEO (see Stage case filings - here and here).

Traub's TBF law firm was required by law to be disqualified from Stage Stores, for lying under oath!.

But = it {TBF} wasn't disqualified!

[br][hr][br]


As seen on Bain's website
http://www.baincapitalventures.com/portfolio/company/the-learning-company/



Romney's Learning Company Merger Cost Mattel Investors $3 Billion

One of the cases Bain was able to pay off American Bridge not to discuss during the 2012 Presidential Election, is that of 'The Learning Company' {Learning}. In 1999, Romney/Bain law firm of MNAT, did merge 'Learning' with Mattel Toys (see SEC filing {here}). Mitt and his gang caused Mattel investors to lose $3 Billion; but Romney and associates wound up with 12 million shares of Mattel Toys. (see stories - {here} and {here})

The Learning Company merger with Mattel is one of THE Worst of All Time!

[br][hr][br]



Kay Bee Toys $100 Million Fraud

Again, it is all the same players. Barry Gold is in Kay Bee bankruptcy through his company Asset Disposition Advisors (ADA) that he owns with Paul Traub (who is the court approved attorney for Kay Bee Creditors). Glazer is the CEO of Kay Bee who paid himself $18 million and Bain $83 Million before filing bankruptcy of Kay Bee (again, please see Taibbi's story "Greed and Debt&quot .

THAT's Bankruptcy Fraud (Traub on one side, Barry Gold, Glazer whom he worked with at Stage on the other).

But wait, it gets even better (or actually worse). MNAT is the firm that is representing Bain about the $83 million in fraud (see Kay Bee bankruptcy filing with MNAT's signature {here}). Now, let's see if you can guess who asked the federal court to be able to prosecute Glazer and Bain?


That's right - no other than Paul Traub (see Kay Bee case request to be prosecutor - {here})

This, of course, keeps monies flowing to Romney (who is now claiming to be 'retroactively' retired from these organized crime spree era of time); but Mitt brags of getting millions each year from Bain Capital; and one CAN"T keep profits from Fraud! (See New York Times article on Romney's benefiting from the shenanigans - {here})

[br][hr][br]



ROMNEY's WHOLE GANG Conspires to do eToys Fraud


Goldman Sachs took eToys public in 1999, where the stock zoomed above $80; but eToys got less than $20 per share. (See New York Times March 2013 story "Rigging the IPO Game&quot . Guess who represents Goldman Sachs in Delaware? That would be Romney's law firm of MNAT.

So MNAT lies about its connections to Goldman Sachs, Romney, Bain and Mattel to become eToys attorney. Traub lies about Romney, Glazer, Barry Gold, Merrill Lynch, Wells Fargo and Goldman Sachs to become eToys Creditors attorney. Then they announce they're going to sell eToys to Bain/Kay Bee (while Romney was still CEO) for a mere $5.4 million. Yours truly and my company (CLI) are hired to handle the liquidation - and we stop the sales. Romney's Bain becomes upset when I force Glazer's Kay Bee to bid tens of millions of dollars to buy eToys assets.

So the Fraudster bring in Barry Gold!

That's right, Traub nominated his partner and co-worker Barry Gold to become the eToys post-bankruptcy petition President/CEO of eToys. Then the crooks, having seized eToys from all sides, toss out yours truly by telling the DE Bankruptcy Court that we WAIVED our rights to be paid $3.7 million in commission for selling eToys to Bain/Kay Bee for tens of millions of dollars. Romney then retires as Bain's CEO and a partner of MNAT (Colm Connolly) is arranged to be the Delaware United States Attorney. Connolly then refuses to investigate and/or prosecute MNAT, Bain, Traub and Barry Gold, even AFTER I'm able to find Smoking Gun proofs that force some confessions to lying under oath to the chief justice. Yesterday, that same chief justice approved Romney's gang stealing eToys.

And that Ain't Right!

[br][hr][br]

Now that you know the rest of the story, you may wish to look at Newt Gingrich's "King of Bain" film on Youtube. It too - is a fraud upon everyone - HIDING - all these frauds that I told Gingrich's camp about. However, what most people don't know is that Sheldon Adelson funded both Romney and Gingrich. Plus it was a Romney former aid who produced the King of Bain documentary. With the links and stories provided above, you can now do a Paul Harvey;

because you now know - the rest of the story

and that makes this a Good Day!
[br]


[br][hr][br]

Romney and his gang now believe they're going to get away with it all.


EEEAAANNNTTTT! - Justice is coming, as the truth is TOO glaring and obvious;
and yours truly isn't giving up, No matter how many corrupt federal persons wish to let Mitt go

Scot Free!

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
1. I want you to see the Defendants (MNAT/Werkheiser) Motion to Dismiss my Complaint
Thu Mar 13, 2014, 03:40 PM
Mar 2014

What is missing from this banter to this court - is the fact that MNAT has CONFESSED lying under oath to a judge.

LINK to Motion to Dismiss
http://petters-fraud.com/MNAT_Werkheiser_Motion_to_Dismiss.pdf

BY LAW - MNAT was supposed to be disqualified from eToys.

HENCE;

MNAT can NOT make any motions against me (the whistleblower who forced MNAT's confessions to occur);
because such is nothing more than RETALIATION Against a Victim /Witness

Retaliation against Victim/Witnesses - is a Federal Crime
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1513

It is ALSO a Racketeering Crime.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1961

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
2. Essence of Motion to Dismiss claims I'm vexatious and without merit
Thu Mar 13, 2014, 03:46 PM
Mar 2014

How in the sam hell can ANYone sit with a straight face and say I'm without merit?

Here's the link - if you'll look at page 9 of the PDF, you'll see that MNAT starts off Plaintiff is pursuing "mostly frivolous"
(which means THERE's items that aren't frivolous).

http://petters-fraud.com/MNAT_Werkheiser_Motion_to_Dismiss.pdf
 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
3. MNAT claims that the Barton Doctrine bars my suing MNAT here in Los Angeles (where eToys was founded
Thu Mar 13, 2014, 03:55 PM
Mar 2014

The Ninth Circuit addressing the Barton case (from 1881)

in the Crown Vantage case decided by the 9th Cir in 2005
states there are 5 principals to determine if Barton is applicable.
http://openjurist.org/421/f3d/963/crown-vantage-inc-v-h

Premise 5 (item 62 of the link) states that;

"Do the claims involve the trustee's breaching her fiduciary duty either through negligent or willful misconduct"?

In this case MNAT confessed lying under oath about Goldman Sachs.

eToys is the client of MNAT that the MNAT law firm was supposed to be protecting from Goldman Sachs.

Hence, Barton doesn't apply!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Romney's Bain Gets Away w...