Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
2. Maybe not "land." But, "water land" is theoretically possible.
Thu Mar 13, 2014, 10:52 PM
Mar 2014

Or whatever it is called when you land on water like Sully.

I don't think there is much we can be certain of at all, though.

bluedigger

(17,086 posts)
8. Unless it is an amphibious aircraft, I'd tend to think of a "water landing" as a crash.
Thu Mar 13, 2014, 11:21 PM
Mar 2014

I guess the difference could turn on whether or not the crew and passengers (or at least a majority) survived the event. But, you're right, we just don't know...

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
3. It will be found as have all others. There has never been a large commercial airliner...
Thu Mar 13, 2014, 10:53 PM
Mar 2014

which disappeared that was not eventually found.

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
7. It was sitting impounded at an airport and was no longer a passenger airliner.
Thu Mar 13, 2014, 11:02 PM
Mar 2014

Which is totally, utterly different from an in-service passenger airliner disappearing in the middle of a flight with over 200 people on board.

As I've said, every single other similar instance of a larger passenger airliner disappearing while in service has been solved.

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
5. I'm still hoping for a miracle of some sort and that
Thu Mar 13, 2014, 10:56 PM
Mar 2014

all the people on the plane are still alive and unharmed somewhere.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
9. That graphic is a little extreme
Thu Mar 13, 2014, 11:31 PM
Mar 2014

There are too many places where air traffic would have picked up an unidentified blip...And they would have been flying low, so their fuel burn would have been incredibly high -- So factor in a shorter range....

And let's get serious -- It DID NOT go anywhere near Japan, China or India, because those nations would have scrambled jets pretty quickly (unless one of those countries are in on a ruse)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Anywhere in this circle (...