General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsU.S. Imposes New Sanctions on Russian Officials
By PETER BAKER
WASHINGTON The United States, working in coordination with Europe, imposed new sanctions on prominent Russian officials on Monday as the showdown over Ukraine reached a new stage of confrontation between East and West.
President Obama signed an executive order freezing the assets and banning visas for a number of Russians deemed to be responsible for the seizing of Crimea or otherwise interfering in Ukrainian sovereignty. Among those targeted were several officials in President Vladimir V. Putins inner circle, and the White House threatened to go after more if Russia did not back down.
We have fashioned these sanctions to impose costs on named individuals who wield influence in the Russian government and those responsible for the deteriorating situation in Ukraine, the White House said in a statement. We stand ready to use these authorities in a direct and targeted fashion as events warrant.
Among those targeted were Vladislav Surkov, one of Mr. Putins most influential advisers, known as the Kremlins gray cardinal; Sergei Glazyev, an economist who has been advising Mr. Putin on Ukraine; Valentina Matviyenko, chairman of the Federation Council, the upper house of Parliament; and Dmitry Rogozin, a deputy prime minister. No sanctions were placed on Mr. Putin.
- more -
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/18/world/europe/us-imposes-new-sanctions-on-russian-officials.html
By Aleksandar Vasovic and Adrian Croft
(Reuters) - The European Union is to impose sanctions including asset freezes and travel bans on 21 officials from Russia and Ukraine after Crimea applied to join Russia on Monday following a weekend referendum, Lithuania's foreign minister said.
Crimea's leaders declared a Soviet-style 97-percent result in favor of seceding from Ukraine in a vote condemned as illegal by Kiev and the West.
After a meeting lasting around three hours, the EU's 28 foreign ministers agreed on a list of those to be sanctioned for their part in Russia's seizure of Crimea and Sunday's referendum on joining Russia.
The ministers had "just agreed on sanctions - travel restrictions & assets freeze against 21 officials from Ukraine & Russia," Lithuanian foreign minister Linan Linkevicius wrote in a message on Twitter.
- more -
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/17/us-ukraine-crisis-idUSBREA1Q1E820140317
greytdemocrat
(3,299 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)Only time will tell.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Those who were saying that Putin was in charge and that Obama was in a position of weakness were correct after all.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"See, we kicked dust on your boots, take that. Those who were saying that Putin was in charge and that Obama was in a position of weakness were correct after all."
...it always seems that way until it doesn't. The RW thinks war is the position of strength in these situations. When it comes to diplomacy, the position is always weak until there is a resolution. It may never come, but diplomacy and whatever else can be used to pressure someone in violation of international law is always preferable to war. Will these sanctions work? Who knows?
The situation is still unfolding. The information about the vote is being provided mostly by pro-Russian sources. Crimea is still under Russian control. Putin is likely to move rapidly, and no doubt the world is watching.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)can't vacation in the EU or US.
Obviously war was never an option, but these 'sanctions' have about as much force as the posts at DU denouncing Putin.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"Obviously war was never an option, but these 'sanctions' have about as much force as the posts at DU denouncing Putin."
...that maybe, but you can't know for sure, and there are also likely other actions to come. Still, short of war, what do you think can be done?
It seems to me that mocking sanctions with the claim that "Putin got to annex Crimea" is simply saying that anyone can invade a country and no one can do a damn thing about it.
Maybe that's true. I doubt the UN and international community are going to simply say, oh well, fuck it, let him have it even though his actions and the referendum were illegal.
There are likely to be ongoing negotiations, and no one can predict the outcome.
From the editorial posted here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024675127
<...>
US foreign policy needs a strong dose of realism and common sense. Its absurd to scold Obama for taking the stick option off the table: the unavoidable fact is that the United States has no stick in relation to Ukraine. Americans have no desire and no reason to go to war with Russia over Crimea, and the EU and the United States are not about to supplant Russias economic influence in Ukraine. Washington is not going to provide the aid, the trade or the subsidized energy Ukraine needs, and the EUwhich is still mired in its own deep economic crisisdoesnt have the means to offer Ukraine much beyond painful austerity. Its new government is not elected, not legitimate and not at all settled. The international community should be pushing hard for compromise before this fragile and bitterly divided country breaks apart.
Frustrated cold warriors filling armchairs in Washingtons outdated strategic think tanks will continue to howl at the moon, but US policy should be run by the sober. The president should work with the EU and Russia to preserve Ukraines territorial unity, support free elections and allow Ukraine to be part of both the EU and the Russian customs union, while pledging that NATO will not extend itself into Ukraine. It is time to reduce tensions, not draw red lines, flex rhetorical muscles and fan the flames of folly.
That is exactly what they will do. Russia has veto power over anything the UN would do.
There will be other symbolic things like permanently kicking Russia off the G7, but really so what?
Crimea is done, over. It was part of Ukraine, now it's part of Russia.
And we've seen the consequences.
Hopefully they'll have something tougher than a sternly-worded letter for the next time he invades someone.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)There will be other symbolic things like permanently kicking Russia off the G7, but really so what?
Crimea is done, over. It was part of Ukraine, now it's part of Russia.
And we've seen the consequences.
Hopefully they'll have something tougher than a sternly-worded letter for the next time he invades someone.
Russia's veto could likely be the impetus to reforming the Security Council.
Still, now that you've run through the options of what isn't going to work, what are you proposing when you say: "tougher than a sternly-worded letter for the next time he invades someone."
Putin may have his sights on the Ukraine, so what are you proposing?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)to dissuade him from going after the rest of Ukraine. Now he has a metric, he knows what the consequences will be for minor incursions. So, he'll just grab a slice here and there.
Would have been better to do nothing than to do something pitiful like sanctions on 7 individuals.
UN Security Council reform aint' gonna happen. Too many states benefit from having one of the Big 5 running interference for them.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"I would have proposed some sanctions that actually had teeth to dissuade him from going after the rest of Ukraine. Now he has a metric, he knows what the consequences will be for minor incursions. So, he'll just grab a slice here and there."
People seem to be approaching this from the standpoint that because Putin invaded Ukraine, Russia is in a position of strength. Forget that his actions could lead the international community to squeeze Russia's economy and expose internal political strife, which is already underway with its increasing crackdown on opposition media and the rising anti-war protests.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)they could have lead to that, but they didn't.
Instead, he gets a victory.
Russian stock market is UP today.
It was a minor victory for him, but a victory nonetheless.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)Then the US couldn't veto resolutions on Israel.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)I would also support NATO/EU moving a brigade or two into Poland or even Ukraine (I'm sure their economy could use both the cash and the stability) itself and reinstating the missile defense agreement we had with Poland but set aside as an overture to the Russians.
The last thing Russia needs to feel is that such moves enhances their security. A brigade of US troops on their border should send a loud, strong message that their actions made them even less secure.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)We can't go too far backward in relation to Putin--we still need to disarm his nukes, and he can still create a lot of trouble for us in Iran.
We can create more problems for him, but still not in our interest to go down that road.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)And you think moving a NATO brigade into Ukraine would bring "stability"?
You don't really give a shit about Ukrainians, do you? It's all about this neo-Cold War crap.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)That's a lot of projection, Comrade.
Russia is threatening Ukraine. My guess is you're OK with that and you don't live there.
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)There are all sorts of democratic, economic and legal hoops that they have to jump through first.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)What precipitated the current crisis was the Yanukovych government reneged on its obligations to make the necessary economic and legal reforms to bring Ukraine into compliance with EU standards.
seveneyes
(4,631 posts)I think they misspelled voting in Crimea and tire burners staging a coup to oust the elected leader.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)It has been an interesting couple of weeks with the new pro-illegal invasion progressives surfacing.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)I guess they'll have to vacation in Crimea instead of going to Disney World.
"I guess they'll have to vacation in Crimea instead of going to Disney World. "
....these people don't care about their assets? Really?