Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGM’s Supplier-Squeezing Days Gave Birth to Flawed Models
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-03-21/gm-s-supplier-squeezing-days-gave-birth-to-flawed-models.htmlThe cars at the center of General Motors Co. (GM)s February recall were still on the drawing board when a top engineer gathered more than a dozen managers and delivered a fateful message: Build them for less.
At the time, around 2000, GMs profit margins were shrinking as worker- and retiree-benefit costs rose and its U.S. market share leadership was eroding. GMs grand plan to make money on small cars, by developing them jointly with Fiat SpA (F), was crashing.
As it became clear that GMs planned Chevrolet Cobalts and Saturn Ions wouldnt get made on a money-saving global design, Gary Altman, the models chief engineer, told the group they needed to find other ways to reduce costs, including a suggestion to pull parts from existing models, said a person who was at the meeting in the automakers suburban Detroit technical center.
Those same Cobalts and Ions are among 1.6 million vehicles that GM recalled last month over an ignition-switch flaw the company says is behind 12 deaths. U.S. investigators and regulators want to know what went wrong, who knew about it and why the nations largest automaker took so long to mount a recall of models made a decade ago.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 705 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
GM’s Supplier-Squeezing Days Gave Birth to Flawed Models (Original Post)
xchrom
Mar 2014
OP
John1956PA
(2,657 posts)1. LA Times: The death toll may be as high as 303.
As many as 303 deaths linked to faulty ignition switches in recalled GM cars
As many as 303 deaths could have been caused by a defect that recently prompted General Motors to recall 1.6 million cars, according to a new report commissioned by an independent consumer watchdog group.
GM has acknowledged only 12 deaths linked to faulty ignition switches that can disable the cars' safety systems.
. . .
http://www.latimes.com/business/autos/la-fi-hy-autos-303-deaths-linked-to-recall-gm-20140313,0,4720511.story#ixzz2wbRurLZz
msedano
(731 posts)2. manufacturing windows for GM trucks
GM's "Targets for Excellence" program required numerous production efficiencies that made sense, but it was counter intuitive, and against economic reality, that we should run the factory so as to ensure an N% annual price reduction. Not that it would be our choice, GM announced they would pay N% less every year for the same product.
John1956PA
(2,657 posts)4. 20 years ago, I heard Japaneses car companies were imposing N% annual price reductions on suppliers.
It did not occur to me that American car companies had implemented that protocol.
Thanks for the information.
SharonAnn
(13,778 posts)5. The Walmart supplier pricing model!
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)6. GM always considered small cars as cheap "starter" vehicles for young people
These young people would be sold a proper full-size model as soon as they could afford it.