General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDU Members, please read: The Lost Art of the Unsent Angry Letter
I have more than once regretted clicking "Send" or "Post my thread!" Perhaps you too have regretted acting, or reacting, while your temper was still hot. Anyway, I found this piece to be both informative and a good reminder.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/23/opinion/sunday/the-lost-art-of-the-unsent-angry-letter.html?_r=0
...
Harry S. Truman once almost informed the treasurer of the United States that I dont think that the financial advisor of God Himself would be able to understand what the financial position of the Government of the United States is, by reading your statement. In 1922, Winston Churchill nearly warned Prime Minister David Lloyd George that when it came to Iraq, we are paying eight millions a year for the privilege of living on an ungrateful volcano out of which we are in no circumstances to get anything worth having. Mark Twain all but chastised Russians for being too passive when it came to the czars abuses, writing, Apparently none of them can bear to think of losing the present hell entirely, they merely want the temperature cooled down a little.
...
Now we need only click a reply button to rattle off our displeasures. And in the heat of the moment, we find the line between an appropriate response and one that needs a cooling-off period blurring. We toss our reflexive anger out there, but we do it publicly, without the private buffer that once would have let us separate what needed to be said from what needed only to be felt. Its especially true when we see similarly angry commentary coming from others. Our own fury begins to feel more socially appropriate. We may also find ourselves feeling less satisfied. Because the angry email (or tweet or text or whatnot) takes so much less effort to compose than a pen-and-paper letter, it may in the end offer us a less cathartic experience, in just the same way that pressing the end call button on your cellphone will never be quite the same as slamming down an old-fashioned receiver.
...
But even though a degree of depth and consideration may well have been lost along with the art of the unsent letter, something was also lost with those old letters that werent sent because their would-be sender overthought their appropriateness. Id have loved for Truman to have actually sent this one off to the red-baiting Republican senator from Wisconsin, Joseph R. McCarthy: You are not even fit to have a hand in the operation of the Government of the United States. I am very sure that the people of Wisconsin are extremely sorry that they are represented by a person who has as little sense of responsibility as you have. Truman may have ended up regretting lashing out, but at least he would have had the satisfaction of knowing that hed told off one of the blights of the American political scene when so many kept quiet. What survived as a hot letter would have made for quite the viral email.
Meanwhile, folks in Wisconsin have feelings of deja vu.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)My iMac's documents have a number of hot letters never sent.
progressoid
(49,999 posts)I've never regretted not posting.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)We need more of this here, and everywhere online
steve2470
(37,457 posts)Vashta Nerada
(3,922 posts)I let them know.
It makes me feel better. I've burned many bridges that way, but I also don't regret any of that.
adirondacker
(2,921 posts)But the death of my sister turned on an excessive amount of rage and I lashed out on many that I regret. It did make me realize my imperfections and allows me to empathize with people who make the same mistakes when in a life altering situation.
That said, I know who my sincere friends are in life and can usually spout out the occasional nonsensical rant without them judging me for it. Sometimes a nod of the head is all it takes.
frazzled
(18,402 posts)If you're talking about personal acquaintances with whom you have a real dispute, that's fine. Tell them off and the relationship will be ended. (You may be right, you may be wrong; I don't know. But you have the right to live with the consequences of severing relationships with friends and family.)
But if we're talking about people venting rage and anger at people they don't even know, and possibly have misunderstood, on the Internetthat's not fine. If you tell someone they deserve to die (because of a mere opinion!), you may feel better, but the person on the receiving end of that horrible statement feels very haunted for a long time. Believe me, I know: it's happened to me on DU.
Thinking only of how your words make you feel is pretty selfish, imo. As liberals, I feel we have an obligation to behave with moderate civility to others in our society, no matter how much we may disagree with them. And especially in the anonymous Internet context, where you have no idea whatsoever of who that person is, or what their feelings are.
Vashta Nerada
(3,922 posts)I am, however, not afraid to call them out on their stupidity or agenda (if I feel they have one).
BTW, one can be an insensitive jerk and still be a liberal. Both aren't mutually exclusive.
MineralMan
(146,333 posts)It's all about results, I think.
steve2470
(37,457 posts)Part of being effective is not wasting your time on closed-minded people, like, for example, the publisher of WND. I'm not implying that anyone here is THAT closed minded, but I would never try to persuade him that President Obama is a good man who was really born in Hawai'i.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)when is the retraction due?
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)for·bear·ance
noun \fȯr-ˈber-ən(t)s, fər-\
: the quality of someone who is patient and able to deal with a difficult person or situation without becoming angry
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)Especially if I know what I'm saying is rude, dismissive, potentially inflammatory. Sometimes I find that just typing out my response to a specific thread or individual post, rereading it, and not sending it is sufficient. I've expressed myself and I'm content. It doesn't matter that no one else will see it.
Kaleva
(36,354 posts)ConservativeDemocrat
(2,720 posts)We disagree, and have tangled more than once, Scuba. But you are on to something here.
I'll try to have a bit more forbearance.
- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community
MineralMan
(146,333 posts)We should all do that whenever we are angry, frustrated, or want to vent. Then, later, we can rewrite to make what we have to say more effective and less offensive.
Thanks.
donco
(1,548 posts)At times its been remorse that I shoulda said something even more insulting.
Skinner
(63,645 posts)...I'll write a scathing response and then not post it. Or I'll write a scathing alert and then not send it.
(If I decide to send a real alert I'll write something clear and polite. But that's different.)
steve2470
(37,457 posts)Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)from this. I know I've later deleted posts that were one-offs when I was riled about something. It's a challenge for those of us who sometimes allow enthusiasm and passion to take over when patience and clarity of writing are so much more effective. I have learned not to react at every hot-headed accusation that comes my way. Sometimes the most effect comeback is none at all. On the other hand I have no intension of becoming milquetoast so sometimes it's just a matter of balance.
herding cats
(19,568 posts)I can't say I've never clicked send/post before when I shouldn't have, but I do find myself doing it much less. Consequently I've an ever growing collection of rants and ravings in my drafts folder. Thinking about it I have no regrets for not sending any of them.
GoneOffShore
(17,341 posts)peace13
(11,076 posts)In this way I know that if I do need the information it is at my fingertips yet I no longer have to store it in my head or heart. This has helped me greatly when dealing with relatives and an unsettled estate. My blood pressure thanks me as well!
LWolf
(46,179 posts)Well, not ALL of the time. Every once in a while, one will slip out of my grasp and onto the site.
Still, it's a good strategy for being able to say what I really think, really get it off my chest, without needlessly offending people. Usually, when it slips by me, I was pissed enough to WANT to offend. I can be more politically correct; I do it all day long at work. Outside of work, I prefer to be more direct; more straightforward. It can be a curse.
Which is why all those stupid questions I've been getting along the lines of "well, when are you going to run?" are so stupid. I'd never run for office, because I'd constantly be telling people what I REALLY thought, and that doesn't win elections, lol.