Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mia

(8,361 posts)
Tue Mar 25, 2014, 12:26 PM Mar 2014

Morning Plum: The incredible shrinking Obamacare sob story

Another day, another Obamacare “victim” ad from Americans for Prosperity shown to be a pack of nonsense.

Today Post fact checker Glenn Kessler takes apart yet another AFP spot, which is targeting multiple Senate Dems, that claims “millions” have ”lost their health insurance” and “are paying more and getting less.” Kessler pillories these ”sweeping” assertions that ”lack context or offer a misleading picture.”

But the broader picture is worth appreciating, too. If you survey AFP spots over time, you’ll see that as they have come under scrutiny, the Obamacare victim tales have gradually withered away and disappeared. A rundown:

– The AFP ad that initially got the most attention featured Michigan cancer victim Julie Boonstra suggesting that under Obamacare, she lost her old plan and her new one was “unaffordable.” It was subsequently revealed that she will actually save money....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2014/03/25/morning-plum-the-incredible-shrinking-obamacare-sob-story/?tid=pm_pop

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Morning Plum: The incredible shrinking Obamacare sob story (Original Post) mia Mar 2014 OP
I predict that post Labor Day (D)s will run on the ACA. Motown_Johnny Mar 2014 #1
I hope so! mia Mar 2014 #2
I've been here 6 years and have over 16K posts Motown_Johnny Mar 2014 #3
Funny! SoapBox Mar 2014 #4
I'm afraid all the fake Obamacare BS has done it's damage though groundloop Mar 2014 #5
"Keep It" beats "Repeal It" almost 2-1 Motown_Johnny Mar 2014 #9
Help me understand this, because I have always supported ACA RVN VET Mar 2014 #6
I think your numbers are wrong Motown_Johnny Mar 2014 #8
No it was the deductible RVN VET Mar 2014 #10
But both she and I looked and looked RVN VET Mar 2014 #11
call a navigator Motown_Johnny Mar 2014 #12
She's doing that RVN VET Mar 2014 #13
These fake stories are really sad Gothmog Mar 2014 #7
 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
1. I predict that post Labor Day (D)s will run on the ACA.
Tue Mar 25, 2014, 01:42 PM
Mar 2014


The sob stories will have shrunk away even more by then and the success stories will be more abundant.




The argument will not be If Obamacare is good for America but just How Much good has Obamacare done for America.




 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
3. I've been here 6 years and have over 16K posts
Tue Mar 25, 2014, 02:20 PM
Mar 2014

But thanks anyways. Better late than never I guess.

groundloop

(11,521 posts)
5. I'm afraid all the fake Obamacare BS has done it's damage though
Tue Mar 25, 2014, 03:25 PM
Mar 2014

The 'news' media was full of stories of people losing healthcare coverage, facing cuts to their coverage, facing drastically increased costs, etc. etc. etc. Average people who don't pay much attention to politics saw that and accepted it as fact.

Now all that BS has been debunked I'm sure the 'news' media will be awash with stories about all those false claims, as well as constant coverage of how Obamacare has helped people.

I'm waiting for the good Obamacare stories.

OK, still waiting.

Still waiting.

Still waiting..............


 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
9. "Keep It" beats "Repeal It" almost 2-1
Tue Mar 25, 2014, 05:18 PM
Mar 2014

So once the narrative changes, which I feel is inevitable, those numbers should get even better. Yes, the damage has been done. But it isn't that bad. 56% for keeping it v 31% for repealing it is a pretty good advantage. 58% - 29% is very easy to imagine and that is a clear 2-1 advantage.



http://kff.org/health-reform/poll-finding/kaiser-health-tracking-poll-february-2014/

^snip^

?w=600&h=450&crop=1



RVN VET

(492 posts)
6. Help me understand this, because I have always supported ACA
Tue Mar 25, 2014, 03:38 PM
Mar 2014

I still think it works well for millions of people, and i am tired of the lying liars put up by the Koch brothers to cast doubt on the law.

That said, i just spoke with my dgtr-in-law about her and my son's foray into ACA. We're Maryland based. She's got a large student debt. Neither make a great deal of money, but together they make enough so they are disqualified for subsidies.

She's facing a hobson's choice, according to the Maryland state exchange. She can pick up an HSA-plan for $276 a month, with a $12,000 deductible ($6,000 each, but the full $12,000 must be met before the plan kicks in). Or a $397 annual penalty.

Last year, she and her husband made use of local Urgent Care facilities at about $100 a visit about half a dozen times, maybe 7.

If she takes the $276 plan -- the cheapest on the State list -- she and my son will pay $3,312 in premiums and still not get any service from the insurer until after they've piled up $12,000 in medical costs they'd have to pay out of pocket-- that's a total of $15,312.00! Last year their out-of-pocket expenses were a little more than $700 -- there were a couple of prescription costs added on to the $100 Urgent Care cost per visit.

If she had the low-end health insurance (It's BC/BS Carefirst) they would have paid the equivalent of the Urgent Care costs, plus $3,312.00! So $3,312.00 plus about $800 in Urgent Care = $4,112. To carry the comparison forward, if they do not sign up this year, they can expect to pay that $700-$800 in urgent care charges, plus the ACA imposed penalty of $397. A total of $1,197.

I've asked her to check with a health insurance broker to see if there's a way out of this dilemma. They are willing to pay a reasonable premium -- reasonable being about $150.00 -- for a policy that only covers catastrophic health costs. Incidentally, she was paying about $60.00 a month for an individual plan in Vermont while she was living there.

I have to admit to being baffled and dismayed by this situation. Am I missing something here? Because if I'm reading this situation right, my son and dgtr-in-law have just fallen between the cracks and, as far as ACA is concerned, are S.O.L.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
8. I think your numbers are wrong
Tue Mar 25, 2014, 04:59 PM
Mar 2014

Are you confusing the out of pocket maximum with the deductible?


I had to guess about age, smoker or not and income level... but..... This seems to be the plan you are talking about: https://www.healthsherpa.com/health-insurance-plans/MD/3231/bluechoice-hsa-silver-1-300?premium=218.00&csr_type=none&zip_code=21105&fip_code=24005 (I put age 35, 2 in family, non-smokers with an income of $60,000)


BlueChoice HSA Silver $1,300
by CareFirst BlueChoice Inc.


Premium
Due monthly, regardless of your health care usage, total for all people to be covered.

$218.00 / month




Deductible
You are responsible for all costs up to this amount per year. You pay part of your costs above this amount, until you spend your out of pocket max. See cost sharing below.


Medical
$1,300 / person-
$2,600 / family-




Out of Pocket Maximum
This is the most you will spend per year for your healthcare costs.


Medical
$6,350 / person-
$12,700 /




Medical Cost Sharing
You are responsible for paying these amounts for medical service usage.

Primary Care$30 copay after deductible
Specialist$40 copay after deductible
Emergency Room20% coinsurance after deductible
Hospital Stay - Physician20% coinsurance after deductible
Hospital Stay - Facility20% coinsurance after deductible
Drug Cost Sharing
You are responsible for paying these amounts for prescription drugs.

Generic20% coinsurance after deductible
Preferred Brand30% coinsurance after deductible
Non-preferred Brand40% coinsurance after deductible
Specialty Brand40% coinsurance after deductible


Additional Resources
The insurer has provided these additional resources to help you research this plan.






As you can see, the out of pocket max. is around $12,000. Not the deductible.


Edit to add: check with a navigator, not a broker.



RVN VET

(492 posts)
10. No it was the deductible
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 06:10 AM
Mar 2014

$12,000 -- and it had to be reached completely. No splitting in half so one person could reach $6,000 and be OK.

The Out of Pocket (OOPs!) was also $12,000.

It was a terrible, terrible deal -- and not at all cheap.

I did not find the plan you referenced and will forward it to my son and daughter-in-law. It's closer to what they were looking for.

Thanks!

RVN VET

(492 posts)
11. But both she and I looked and looked
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 06:14 AM
Mar 2014

on Maryland's exchange site and never stumbled on it. Maybe we're both just confused noobies -- but I really think the site is poorly designed.

Thanks again for the skinny!

Gothmog

(145,479 posts)
7. These fake stories are really sad
Tue Mar 25, 2014, 04:01 PM
Mar 2014

Every time the conservatives find one of these stories, it turns out to be false. Facts do matter (except is you watch Fox News)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Morning Plum: The incredi...