General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEverybody Loves Rachel Maddow
http://prospect.org/article/everybody-loves-rachel-maddowEverybody Loves Rachel Maddow
Tom Carson
March 26, 2012
With brains, good humorand too much showmanshipMSNBCs biggest star has captured the liberal imagination.
(Photo by Frank Micelotta/PictureGroup)
I cant say for sure when it happenedit was after Barack Obamas swearing-in yet before Keith Olbermann got suspended for giving money to Democratsbut at some point it began dawning on people that the face of MSNBC was Rachel Maddow. Certainly her bosses thought so. Not only did she have her own prime-time show but she also began landing the gigs traditionally reserved for a networks Grand Poo-Bah, in particular, anchoring election-night coverage.
You can understand why MSNBC execs would want Maddow in this talismanic chair for the 2012 campaign. Young and sunny, shes their highest-rated anchor, especially among the magical 25-to-54 demographic, which makes her the ideal front woman for a network whose tagline is Lean Forward. Just as important, shes their easiest and most polite host, a woman who once chastised Pat Buchanan on Dan Abrams after he told a Clinton campaign worker to shut up, a rebuke that left the old pitchfork-waver abashed. Although she can sometimes be too doggone cute, Maddow embodies virtuesrationality, good humor, and courtesythat make her an alluring alternative to our cultures furious partisan stridency. Her upbeat civility is perfect for wrangling MSNBCs election-night panel, which includes such monsters of vainglory as bluff, blue-collar Ed Schultz, Lawrence (Im the real insider here) ODonnell, and the Reverend Al Sharpton, whose patter has become so lazily formulaic that he seems like a refugee from Portlandia. Smiling and cajoling, Maddow turns them as amiable as puppies.
Maddow is someone liberals can feel good about themselves for liking. She has left-of-Barack politics, yet because her father is a retired Air Force captain, she can speak of caring about the troops without shamming. Shes got the intellectual credentials that our side lovesan Oxford Ph.D.! yet shes also down with pop culture, talking of her life in terms of John Hughes movies. Topping it all off, shes an openly lesbian anchor in an era when people still discuss whether Anderson Cooper is gay. Not so long ago, being out would have kept Maddow off the air. Now, it feels positively ordinary.
snip//
Watching her program, you can see how carefully she studied Olbermanns way of juggling entertainment, politics, and headlines. She learned that a news show should be a show, with humor, shifting rhythms of monologue and dialogue, catchily labeled segments, and a deployment of old clips that aspires to prestidigitation. This vast galaxy is a wonder to be exploited, whether youre tracing how presidents have talked up war over the decades or how once--maverick Republicans like John McCain went from embracing cap-and-trade to shunning it. Maddow also graspedand sharedOlbermanns respect for language. No news show in history has ever been so fastidiously, even preeningly written as Countdown. But where Olbermann increasingly came to read his lines, even his funny ones, with an overbearing, almost martial precisionby God, he was going to let you know how magnificently written his program wasMaddow has always been shrewd at knowing how to make herself appealing. Although The Rachel Maddow Show is probably the second most painstakingly written news show ever, she reads her script in a deliberately shambly way that feels down-to-earth. (Think of her wearing that blue hard hat in the terrific MSNBC promo at the Hoover Dam.) Her persona appeals to the viewers intelligence by being hard to catch in the act of being intelligent.
monmouth
(21,078 posts)admired, especially the "smarts" part. Big, good things in her future.
Taverner
(55,476 posts)izquierdista
(11,689 posts)or is she trying to bring back the Goldwater look?
babylonsister
(171,070 posts)TeeYiYi
(8,028 posts)I wear black RayBans.
TYY
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)The frames are non-conductive, so, being an electrician.. The pair on the far right, complete with little metal billet in the corner and all.
babylonsister
(171,070 posts)tkmorris
(11,138 posts)And yes, that's what we all called them. BCs for short.
loudsue
(14,087 posts)She's so smart & beautiful and cool. I just love her!
Zorra
(27,670 posts)or not?
Yavin4
(35,441 posts)So, when she does her show, she becomes Super Rachel!
Lost-in-FL
(7,093 posts)Odin2005
(53,521 posts)mzmolly
(50,996 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)Highway61
(2,568 posts)and cute!
loudsue
(14,087 posts)AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)The last shot.... the masks in the rain.... was DEEP!
love it.
TahitiNut
(71,611 posts)I loved that skit, and I also love Rachael. She is such a lady, while being the sharpest commentator in TV land. Keep on doing whatcha doin', darlin, and we'll keep on watchin'.
shcrane71
(1,721 posts)Unlike almost every other public figure, I can't think of a time she's ever had a bad hair day.
Response to babylonsister (Original post)
Post removed
JitterbugPerfume
(18,183 posts)but I sure do love me some Rachel!
KaryninMiami
(3,073 posts)Plus it warms my heart knowing that she represents the next generation - not everyone but I think she speaks for quite a few. When I speak with folks on the fence or those who are totally unaware (and not engaged in news and politics), I strongly urge that if they are going to watch one national news show, to watch Rachel. I learn something from her almost every day. Go Rachel!
efhmc
(14,726 posts)Seems like she would be too liberal. But being well informed and treating others with respect gets her all kinds of good interviews.
xtraxritical
(3,576 posts)donquijoterocket
(488 posts)certain PBS shows and Al Jazeera(English). You don't really watch Rachel for news,although you get that too, but for the context of the news and current events and the insightful analysis she brings to everything she does.Near as I can tell the right wingers are so dismissive and critical because they have no one who even comes close to her level of ability.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)But I seem to know about things before my friends do.... and more about them!... from her show.
honeylady
(157 posts)She (as far as I know) was as heterosexual as a person could be, but she would always say when we were watching her "that is the most handsome woman I've ever seen". I think Rachel will make us all very proud in the future - she certainly is in the present.
eridani
(51,907 posts)eridani
(51,907 posts)I also like "friends with benefits." We need an expression for being "in like." Also an expression explaining the occasional same sex attractions among heterosexuals.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)eridani
(51,907 posts)We sure could have used some of those refinements in discussing relationships back in the 70s, for sure.
sakabatou
(42,152 posts)FailureToCommunicate
(14,014 posts)ProfessionalLeftist
(4,982 posts)Never misses her show.
nevergiveup
(4,762 posts)and being old and stuck in my ways I am a tough sell.
Bladian
(475 posts)I do also love Rachel. I usually have MSNBC on in the background while I'm on the computer or something, but once it hits eight o'clock I start to pay attention until 10-no offense Lawrence.
madrchsod
(58,162 posts)the most intelligent person with a wicked sense of humor on the teevee. .what more can one ask for?
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)couldn't put my finger on the one thing...then realized it's because of ALL of those things.
Pab Sungenis
(9,612 posts)Enrique
(27,461 posts)LittleGirl
(8,287 posts)I love Rachel. Both as a fellow woman but human. She reminds me a bit of Jon Stewart. She's able to bring some humor and directness to her show and I too learn something new every single show. I never imagined watching talking heads about Politics but I am absolutely hooked on Keith and Rachel. I am so thankful for both of them.
Blue Owl
(50,414 posts)Keep on rockin' it, Rachel!
Historic NY
(37,451 posts)marlakay
(11,473 posts)he hates politics and won't watch anything but local news but cocktail time he loves it.
bluedigger
(17,086 posts)I think Rachel is great, too, but this story, not so much.
Jennicut
(25,415 posts)She is smart, classy, respectful, funny. She is the best of the best to me. Plus, she is only a few years older then me. I totally relate to her. And I find that others can relate to her too, she is so down to earth. I love her openness about who she is. She and Alex Wagner are my favorites and make women like Erin Burnett look idiotic. And she makes me laugh. Perfect host.
rusty fender
(3,428 posts)Graybeard
(6,996 posts)Back in the days of Al Franken's AirAmerica Rachel's show was a must. When she started on MSNBC she did both gigs, TV and her radio show, for a while. She's the best.
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)in a detailed, yet calm manner. I like how she doesn't have to shout over her guests who have opposing views in order to get hers across. I also like how she doesn't hold back on the Dems whenever someone from our side does something shady or foolish, such as how there were a few who voted for the Blunt Amendment. People try to accuse MSNBC (and especially Rachel's show) of being the polar opposite of Fox News and being "liberal propaganda", but I think her show is about as close as a person can get to being fair and balanced, yet providing the facts.
LynneSin
(95,337 posts)that seem to be peppered throughout Faux News.
Mind you, I'm a natural Blonde in RL and I know many smart liberals who are blonde or even bleached blonde. But Faux News seems to have this idea that somehow people will believe them more if they make sure to include a bubbleheaded bleach blonde in front of the camera.
Rachel shows us that you can be a woman, look like a REAL woman and have a well-rated News Show.
marlakay
(11,473 posts)I think its so the men will watch!
Mosaic
(1,451 posts)She did a hit piece on Mexico recently, almost giddy that the US is taking their uranium they use for peaceful purposes. She is whistle blowing to the hate immigrants neanderthals. For that and other times I've caught her hating on Mexicans, I'm white by the way, I don't believe she is a true liberal, and should be questioned.
yodermon
(6,143 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)Your post is the strangest thing I've seen in a longtime on DU.
annabanana
(52,791 posts)weird
SamG
(535 posts)listening very closely. Mexico agreed to surrender it's ENRICHED uranium, as did several other nations under non-proliferation treaties signed YEARS AGO.
Of course, the point of the story is that the Obama administration is carefully and skillfully reducing the amounts of ENRICHED uranium worldwide, in countries where it would be deadly dangerous to fall into the wrong hands, (like terrorist organizations, gangs, etc.....Mexico has those, and they know it)...
So Mexico willingly gave up the material. The US will downgrade the material back here.
I totally can understand the Pat Buchanan thing. I disagree with almost every thing he's about, but he's one of those people I feel I might actually like if i knew him. I'd love to argue with him, like some conservatives I've personally known.
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)....there is no one "pure enough" that someone on DU can't find a flaw.
bayareaboy
(793 posts)here in Castro Valley Ca. We don't have many Rhodes scholars.
I like the thing she does when she interviews someone and says, did I get that right, and the person always says, yes you did! That is some one who understands that being honest is more important than anything else.
Old and In the Way
(37,540 posts)She causes sever migraines for the intelligence impaired.
FlaGatorJD
(364 posts)Briliiant, adorable, and humble. We love you Rachel!
Keep up the great work.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)Just really attractive.
myrna minx
(22,772 posts)marlakay
(11,473 posts)Over the years I have found I watch the other shows less and less and hers more and more.
12AngryBorneoWildmen
(536 posts)Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)veganlush
(2,049 posts)that I watch that inspires me like hers does. I forward pieces of her show to right-leaning friends and family knowing they'll likely not watch but if anybody can get the hidden truth through, she can. I also post her best pieces on facebook from time to time. It's important to keep on planting the seeds of doubt in the minds of the right wingers who are voting against their interests.
GETPLANING
(846 posts)she works harder and more diligently than anyone to gather the facts. She always asks her guests, both liberal and conservative, if there is anything about her reporting that they think she got wrong, and if they wish to add or correct anything. And she is scrupulously honest. Her discussions with guests are exactly that - discussions. Fox treats their guests like prisoners who are there for an interrogation.
12AngryBorneoWildmen
(536 posts)SamG
(535 posts)the fact that she works so hard and does so well with the facts.
No yelling, no interrupting, no bullsh*t!!!
It's her style and presentation that I can't stand. Her content is great, most of the time. But she's not very liberal either, folks. She worships the military, for one thing.
SamG
(535 posts)her father, for one reason, and her book describes largely how America has moved to using the military for warfare in a detestable way.
She's been an advocate of repeal of DADT for years. She's been a constant critic of military budget creep and waste as well.
Courtesy Flush
(4,558 posts)1 1/2 years of youth left. Better enjoy.
I always thought "young" meant 18-34, in marketing math. This is certainly good news.
Habibi
(3,598 posts)Pretty soon, though, I bet we'll still be in the "young" demographic--to 62. I'm counting on it.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Slight problem: All-Time Favorite Human Being compared her wife to Rachel the other day. Now I fear she may have ruined Rachel for me, too.
mike_c
(36,281 posts)No TV here, and I have very little interest in that medium generally, so I almost never pursue its celebrities on YouTube or other means of redistribution. Just not interested.
babylonsister
(171,070 posts)you're probably living a nice peaceful life w/o the tube.
chollybocker
(3,687 posts)(according to promo spot during Madness).
Loves me some Rachel.
rhiannon55
(2,671 posts)and she suddenly announced, "I'm going to marry Rachel!"
babylonsister
(171,070 posts)AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)If you were Republican.... you'd be taking your granddaughter for electric shock treatments... IMMEDIATELY!
Cure that liberal/gay away!
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)LWolf
(46,179 posts)I've never watched or listened to her. I banned talk shows of any kind from my radio and tv 12 years ago, and I'm not going back.
I'm glad she gives the left someone to like, though.
felix_numinous
(5,198 posts)for so many reasons, one of the best being how QUICK she is on her comebacks against RW talking points, and how she catches them in their lies. Brilliant!!!!
shellinaya
(55 posts)I like Maddow, but come on, she is super annoying to listen to, talks too fast, and it takes her a minimum of 10 minutes to make a point on her show. I try to watch her show every other day and when she starts out with the stories to make a point I know I'm in for 15 minutes of drivel to make her points. She talks to her audience like we're CHILDREN. Doesn't that annoy anyone else? I'm older than Maddow as are a lot of her listeners, and I wish she'd quit talking to her audience like we're in 2nd grade.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)It's not a RW bumper stickers show y'know. The world is complicated so it might take a precious 10 minutes to give you the info. It might take a whole friggin' 10 minutes to explain the Wall Street scams or the diplomatic tensions in Iran. The whole problem with RW talking points is there is no substance to them. That's why RW ideas don't work. They haven't thought them thru.... for 10 minutes. This instant gratification lazy anti-intellectualism is what's ruining this country.
Don't tell me.... you can't sit thru an 86 minute movie without getting up at least once...right?
babylonsister
(171,070 posts)Canuckistanian
(42,290 posts)I find an important part of my weekday watching Maddow discuss the news of the day, replete with historical background, fascinating guests and devastating analysis of the day's issues.
She's a national treasure. Don't let her be ousted or fade away. Ever.
aint_no_life_nowhere
(21,925 posts)Maddow always manages to have an interesting take on a story. While I enjoy the various shows on MSNBC, they do tend to get repetitive of each other except for Rachel.
Skittles
(153,169 posts)I was an instant fan and that is unusual - it usually takes a while for me to warm up to people
DFW
(54,405 posts)When I was browsing through Air America years ago, I was looking to find Bobby Kennedy's Ring of Fire show,
and chanced to hear Rachel Maddow. I was just blown away by her easy style combined with what was obviously
a towering intellect. THAT, I think, is what stands her apart from all others. She is that rare combination of a super-
high intelligence along with a fluent ease of style.
I had the privilege to meet her and her parents last summer on Cape Cod. I had never seen her stand up on TV,
so I was a little confused at first. I saw this slender 6 foot tall woman coming toward me with those trademark
glasses, and I said, wow, she looks a lot like Rachel Maddow. As it turned out, the resemblance was due to the
fact that she WAS Rachel Maddow. She held out her hand, and said, "hi, I'm Rachel." I smiled, and said, "yes, I
know who you are." LOL. She took off, and my daughter was heading off to Boston to connect to New York, so
my wife and I stuck around, and I chatted a while with her parents (lovely people, by the way) who are very proud
of her. And well they should be!!