Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPssssssst!!! There Still May Be Options for Federal Investigators Probing the LaneClosures
http://www.northjersey.com/news/gwb-scandal-there-was-a-traffic-jam-but-was-there-a-crime-1.750962<snip>
It was a traffic jam apparently created for political retribution not an allegation of bribery or kickbacks that set off the chain of events that has enveloped Governor Christies administration in a scandal that has threatened to derail his presidential ambitions.
But a group of former prosecutors, law professors and criminal defense attorneys say there still may be options for federal investigators probing the lane closures. Among them are laws and legal opinions that have deep roots in constitutional law, they say. And each of those options, while presenting a viable route to prosecution, also presents problems relating to proof.
Theres a provision of the federal law that makes it a crime to interfere with the right of interstate travel, said Stephen Gillers, a New York University law professor who has written widely on legal and judicial ethics. Its a rather broad statute, and given the clear, undeniable fact that movement across a state line was impeded, it seems to be a statute that would attract the interest of federal prosecutors.
That statute was a key in prosecuting several cases involving discrimination and violence against African-Americans in the 1960s. Other statutes that might apply include those that relate to conspiracy and extortion, but they present tough hurdles for prosecutors. And if it turns out there was a coverup, charges for obstruction of justice could be used, experts said.
MORE at link
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 665 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pssssssst!!! There Still May Be Options for Federal Investigators Probing the LaneClosures (Original Post)
malaise
Mar 2014
OP
rocktivity
(44,576 posts)1. Well, we DO have Christie dead bang on at least one count of obstruction
He DID participate in the traffic study coverup.
Which is why I hope that no one gets immunity -- between that and his relationship with Samson, Christie can be taken down without the "help" of Kelly, Wildstein, and Associates!
rocktivity
malaise
(269,060 posts)3. The coverup always gets them
warrior1
(12,325 posts)2. using the power of his office to harm the public is a crime