General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA Massive Chemical Plant Is Poised to Wipe This Louisiana Town off the Map
"This is their ancestral home. These are descendants of slaves that moved here when they weren't wanted in any other parts of the community."
The project, spearheaded by the South African chemical giant SASOL, will cost as much as $21 billion, but stands to benefit from more than $2 billion in incentives (including $115 million in direct funding) from the cash-strapped state budget. It has the backing of Republican Gov. Bobby Jindal, considered a likely 2016 presidential candidate, who traveled to the outskirts of Lake Charles for the official announcement of the plan in 2012. The state thinks it's an economic slam dunk. One study from Louisiana State University projected that it would have a total economic impact of $46.2 billion. It is the largest industrial project in the history of Louisiana. And after a community meeting on Tuesday, it's one step closer to realization.
But that massive plant will come with a steep environmental price. It will produce more greenhouse gases than any other facility in the state. And the project will almost certainly spell the end for the 224-year-old settlement of Mossville, a poor enclave that has been forced to play host to industrial facilities no one else wanted in their backyard.
An analysis conducted by the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) in February determined that the new project "will result in significant net emissions increases" of greenhouse gases, promethium, sulfur oxide, nitric oxide, and carbon monoxide. By its calculations, the plant will spew out more than 10 million cubic tons of greenhouse gases per year. (By contrast, the Exxon-Mobil refinery outside Baton Rouge, a sprawling complex that's 250 times the size of the New Orleans Superdome, emits 6.6 million tons.)
More here:
http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2014/03/sasol-mossville-louisiana
Environmental Justice & the PVC Chemical Industry
The health and well being of Mossville residents has been harmed with elevated rates of disease. Studiesby the U.S. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) found alarming results residents had more than three times the national average of dioxins in their blood, elevated dioxins in breast milk, and high cancer mortality rates .xxix A university study found Mossville residents were two to three times more likely to suffer from health problems, including a high incidence of ear, nose, and throat illnesses, central nervous system disturbances, and cardiovascular problems, as well as increased skin, digestive, immune, and endocrine disorders.xxx
Ever determined to reclaim their lives, Mossville residents have fought back against the polluters and had real results, including winning relocation for many families due to a 1994 Condea Vista spill of one million pounds of ethylene dichloride that caused well water contamination.xxxi Mossville citizens also successfully advocated at the national level, achieving a 2005 U.S. Court of Appeals decision to change outdated and ineffective EPA emissions standards for vinyl chloride plants.xxxii Mossville Environmental Action Now (MEAN) brought the first ever environmental human rights legal challenge against the U.S. Government that is being reviewed by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights of the Organization of American States. More recently, MEAN compiled data from the USEPA and ATSDR and found 77% of the mixture of dioxin compounds released by the Georgia Gulf PVC plant were the same dioxin compounds that made up 77% of the dioxins detected in the blood of Mossville residents. This finding shows that residents are accumulating the same mixture of dioxin compounds being released from the Georgia Gulf PVC plant and this mixture includes the most toxic forms of dioxin. xxxiii
Next time you pick up that PVC backpack or look at the PVC flooring in your childrens school, think about communities such as Mossville, Louisiana where these products are created.
http://www.chej.org/pvcfactsheets/Environmental_Justice_and_the_PVC_Chemical_Industry.html
Report can be found here:
http://www.loe.org/images/content/100423/mossville.pdf
TexasTowelie
(112,468 posts)The poor will always be fodder for multi-national corporations.
SunsetDreams
(8,571 posts)This is beyond horrible. Can you imagine being forced to live in a place like that due to not having the means necessary to move elsewhere? Beyond that why should they have to move when they have built their whole lives there? It's so sad.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)SunsetDreams
(8,571 posts)ReRe
(10,597 posts)Kicking for exposure only. Thanks, SunsetDreams for the OP. A dark day in our democracy.
SunsetDreams
(8,571 posts)Divernan
(15,480 posts)Both the South African chemical giant, SASOL and the Clinton Foundation are clients of a South African business consultant firm, Consequent. SASOL is the corporate behemoth dangling $20 billion in front of Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal to get his approval of this project. But hey, corporate bribes, oops, I mean campaign donations are not just for Republicans anymore.
Consequent describes itself as:
http://www.consequent.co.za/clients.php
SASOL plans on being a major player/profiteer in the US, so one expects not only campaign contributions to Mrs. Clinton as the most publicized presidential candidate, but a hefty "donation", i.e., investment in the Clinton Foundation, perhaps facilitated by the Consequent connection. http://www.bdlive.co.za/business/industrials/2013/03/17/sasol-s-new-us-ethane-operation-is-a-cracker
Keep an eye on SASOL. It has big plans to add big time to US air pollution via its planned business operations.
Headline: March 17, 2013
SASOL's new US ethane operation is a cracker.
The group, which makes about 66% of its operating profit converting coal to fuels in SA, plans to invest up to $7bn in the ethane project in Louisiana and up to $14bn more to build two gas-to-liquids (GTL) plants there.
An analyst said: "I really like Sasol's ethane plans. About half of the globe's ethane crackers rely on oil as a feedstock, while Sasol will use gas, which is much cheaper. If you use oil, as they typically do in Europe and Asia, you're losing money. If you use gas in the US or the Middle East, you can earn record margins."
Basically, as the article details, fracking provides cheap gas, which motivates the global corporations to manufacture chemicals in the US. That would translate to jobs, perhaps, but very low wage, non-union jobs, accompanied by massive pollution of health, air and water, as we see in the OP.
De Ruyter said the low cost and abundance of gas in the US would enable the market to remain competitive in chemical manufacturing.
"Everyone wants to be in the US. Very little new capacity is planned for the rest of the world. We think there is enough space for everyone in the US," he said.
SunsetDreams
(8,571 posts)Demo_Chris
(6,234 posts)It literally looks like fucking Beirut. The downtown was nothing but abandoned buildings. Those with money have left, those without remain. They might not have the cash for urban renewal, but the police have themselves a cool new tank.