Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLaw constrains power - that's why the U.S. wants it ...
for everyone else. Were So Exceptional
Exceptionalist rhetoric is more than a language game for politicians trying to win support from an anxious electorate traversing the dark wood of possible imperial decline. Exceptionalism also influences the practice of American policy, nowhere more so than in US approaches to international law and justice.
Law, after all, constrains power, and the United States, like any great power, is likely to support a law-bound international order only if it ties up the power of its competitors more than it constrains its own. Other great powers have subscribed to this realist calculus in advancing international law. America is exceptional in combining standard great-power realism with extravagant idealism about the countrys redemptive role in creating international order. Since Franklin Roosevelts leadership in setting up the United Nations and the Nuremberg trials, the US has promoted universal legal norms and the institutions to enforce them, while seeking by hook or by crook to exempt American citizens, especially soldiers, from their actual application.1 From Nuremberg onward, no country has invested more in the development of international jurisdiction for atrocity crimes and no country has worked harder to make sure that the law it seeks for others does not apply to itself.
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2012/apr/05/were-so-exceptional/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 972 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Law constrains power - that's why the U.S. wants it ... (Original Post)
ashling
Mar 2012
OP
lsewpershad
(2,620 posts)1. Hyprocacy????
Dictatorship????? Megalomania?????
ashling
(25,771 posts)3. Hyprocacy????
that's a new one on me
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)2. Our exceptional exceptionalness is what makes us so exceptional
That's why our soldiers can mow down civilians like so many blackberry canes, and be protected with all the rights and privileges of due process, but anybody else is subject to summary execution as a "rogue" soldier. It's almost like there are two completely different standards at work here. Nothing bad will ever come of it, I'm sure. None of y'all mind if some bitter grudge-holder decides to take a little rogue revenge on a civilian target he can reach rather than on the heavily-fortified American wehrmacht, do you?