Microsoft censoring Windows Live Messenger chats for copyright infringement

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/03/26/microsoft-censoring-windows-live-messenger-chats-for-copyright-infringement/

Tech giant Microsoft is actively intercepting and censoring conversations in its Windows Live Messenger program, utilizing a block list to prevent users from trading links to a popular peer-to-peer media sharing website known as The Pirate Bay.

While it’s not surprising that a corporate block list would include The Pirate Bay, one of the Internet’s most notorious havens for media sharing in violation of copyright laws around the world, at least one branch of the website devoted to legal peer-to-peer sharing is also being blocked.

In a trial-run Monday morning, Raw Story discovered that Microsoft is also blocking “The Promo Bay,” where artists submit their materials to be discovered by a mass audience.

Artists the world over use The Promo Bay to help develop a global fanbase, utilizing the very technologies that have caused such consternation among the entertainment industry’s largest players.
_____________________________________________________________________________

Now correct me if I'm wrong Doesn't Microsoft have a stake or connection with itunes? Doesn't this just boil down to ONE thing --In an age where writers can self publish and musicians can basically create CDs on their own; All this "Privacy acts" and Law enforcement busting people I have to ask -aside from actually getting those who are infriging- COULD it be that by censoring sites like Promo Bay they are making it harder for writers musicians and even independent movie makers (think you tube) to succeed in any way shape and form without a corporation behind them.

Basically all this 'copyright' protection seems to be protecting corporations more than the actual artist.

Corporations can be very controling. Let me give you an example: A group-I absolutely love-did a 25 year box set CD dvd thing. NOW the group has has two different companies produce their albums. The hits through out their 25 year career. BUT the DVD showing all the music videos ONLY has videos from when they where with the first company. So in sense the company was going to profit the most.

Another example. A friend of mine has a relative -semi famous- did work in the late 60s early 70s. Wrote songs recorded them. My friend was explaining to me now that this relative does NOT have control of the songs. Not only can the company who produce the songs OWN rights BUT this relative has to have permission to perform said songs.

So really who is being protected and WHO is getting screwed.