General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPlutocracy without end: Why the 1 percent always defeats the middle class
There are more of us than them. But income inequality keeps getting worse -- and there is sadly no end in sight
THOMAS FRANK
Ive been writing about what we politely call inequality since the mid-1990s, but one day about ten years ago, when I was traveling the country lecturing about the toxic curlicues of right-wing culture, it dawned on me that maybe I had been getting the entire story wrong. All the economic developments that I spent my days bemoaningthe obscene enrichment of the CEO class, the assault on the regulatory state, the ruination of average peoplewere very possibly not what I thought they were. When I talked about these things, I assumed they were an outrage, an affront to the affluent nation I still believed we were; once the scales fell from our eyes and Americans figured out what was happening, I argued, we would yell stop, bring this age of folly to a close, and get back to middle-class prosperity as usual.
What hit me that day was the possibility that my happy, postwar middle-class world was the exception, and that the plutocracy we were gradually becoming was the norm. Maybe what was happening to us was a colossal reversion to a pre-Rooseveltian mean, and all the trappings of ordinary life that had seemed so solid and so permanent when I was youngthe vast suburbs and the anchormans reassuring baritone and the nice appliances that filled the houses of the working classwere aberrations made possible by an unusual balance of political forces maintained only by the enormous political efforts of its beneficiaries.
Maybe the gravity of history pulled in the exact opposite direction of what I had always believed. If so, the question was not, When will we get back to the right order of things, but rather, Would we ever stop falling?
Today, of course, the situation has grown vastly worse. The subject of inequality is discussed everywhere; there are think tanks and academic conferences dedicated to it; it has become socially permissible for polite people to wonder about the obscene gorging of those at the top. Sooner or later the question that everyone asks, upon discovering just how much of what Americans produce goes to the imbeciles in the penthouses and executive suites, is this: How much further can this thing go?
more
http://www.salon.com/2014/03/30/plutocracy_without_end_why_the_1_percent_always_defeats_the_middle_class/
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)n2doc
(47,953 posts)The 0.001% have resources today that Louis XVI couldn't have dreamed of.
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)it no longer has anything left to lose...
you forgot about inflation . And more and more greed .
rurallib
(62,416 posts)which through repetition on the TV screen keeps the poor and downtrodden work harder than hell against there best interests.
Good old religion is another resource that has upped its game.
Sadly the last resource is that what is supposed to be an opposition to the plutocrats in a 2 party system - the democrats - is half owned by the plutocrats.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)rich and make it more equal.
Since the rich own the government, and taxing them into submission is not a real possibility, a three day nationwide general strike and boycott of corporate goods and services owned by wealthy private interests could be our first step in bargaining for regaining control of our government and more equal distribution of wealth.
Maintaining the status quo of rapid polarization of wealth will return us to hopeless feudalism in the not too distant future, if the plutarchs don't kill off all life on the planet before the not too distant future arrives.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)Yes, in some part this wealth comes about as a product of winning public office, but for the majority of those who win seats in Congress, they are ALREADY multi-millionaires.
If they are legislating in favor of the rich, it's in part because it is SELF-INTEREST.
MattSh
(3,714 posts)boycotts? pffft.
a three day strike? Not likely it will happen, not likely long enough to make any difference.
Occupy? Now there's a winner. See how they reacted to that? They implemented the full power of the police state and the world's most powerful propaganda machine to end that one.
Americans are not yet ready to be gassed, bashed, and jailed, and keep coming back for more, in ever increasing numbers. When that happens, then maybe you'll start seeing some change.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Someone should be working on a strategy. There are tools available but we need to get the message out.
geretogo
(1,281 posts)elzenmahn
(904 posts)Occupy, save for the Black Bloc movement, was largely non-violent - and look how brutally that was put down.
A general strike? More motivation to move jobs here overseas - and how do you coordinate such a thing, especially with the government monitoring of the Internet and infiltration of "groups of interest"?
A mass boycott of a given state or the nation at large? That was discussed regarding Florida and the Stand-Your-Ground law, but the media on both sides trumpeted how bad of an idea that would be. (Which, considering the source, may mean it's the best idea.)
This is going to be a tough nut to crack. And it may well mean people will be going to jail. But if you believe Chris Hedges, we're at that stage now.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)with specific tactics. The longer we wait, the more it's apt to be violent and that plays directly into the hands of the PTB.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)from the Salon article:
The ugly fact that we must face is that this thing can go much farther still. Plutocracy shocks us every day with its viciousness, but that doesnt mean God will strike it down. The middle-class model worked much better for about ninety-nine percent of the population, but that doesnt make it some kind of dialectic inevitability. You can build a plutocratic model that will stumble along just fine, like it did in the nineteenth century. It requires different things: instead of refrigerators for all, it needs bought legislatures and armies of strikebreakersplus bailouts for the big banks when they collapse under the weight of their stupid loans, an innovation of our own time. All this may be hurtful, inefficient, and undemocratic, but it wont dismantle itself all on its own.
That is our job. No one else is going to do it for us.
I agree with a post above saying a general strike would get things rolling. Hard to see it happening, but it's one of the few tools the 99% have remaining that wouldn't be shrugged off by the plutocrats.
canoeist52
(2,282 posts)We just need to convince The People of this.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
geretogo
(1,281 posts)Populist_Prole
(5,364 posts)A bit of an oversimplification, but not as much as you might think. The working class does in fact have the numbers to defeat the plutocrats many times over...IF, the working class always voted on economic concerns. Too many do not and get distracted by social issue bullshit.