Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 07:50 PM Mar 2014

The Cost of Cruelty: Republicans are scared to death of exposure of their Medicaid Death Panels

Last edited Sun Mar 30, 2014, 09:00 PM - Edit history (1)

Voters should know who’s holding up their health care and Democratics should run with the ACA! Not against it.

Not new, just ignored by the MSM thirsty for more ad money.

http://articles.mcall.com/2014-01-30/news/mc-pennsylvania-deaths-no-medicaid-expansion-20140130_1_medicaid-expansion-expanding-medicaid-medicaid-program#ixzz2s009cIx0


New report says thousands of uninsured will go without medical tests and treatments

January 30, 2014|By Tim Darragh and Steve Esack, Of The Morning Call
The Corbett administration's decision not to expand Medicaid under the new federal health-care law will result in an additional 400-1,500 deaths in Pennsylvania a year, nearly 13,000 additional families with catastrophic medical expenses and tens of thousands of cases of untreated depression, diabetes and missed screening tests, according to a study published Thursday.

Gathered by researchers from Harvard University and the City University of New York, the estimates show that in the states that opted out of expanding Medicaid, 7,000-17,000 additional deaths will occur among people who would have been covered had expansion been supported.

__________________


All it takes is a little courage and a little exposure. Shame the blood and money thirsty media into reporting the obvious or risk another Iraq war like debacle, where the truth is smothered under tons and tons of bullshit flung at any truth that dare be mentioned.

________________________________

Here is an opinion on how:

"Louisiana isn’t the only state where Republicans are preventing thousands of low-income Americans from receiving health care. In Virginia, where state lawmakers refuse to expand Medicaid, hospitals will face higher costs and reduced services as a result. One million Texans will be denied access to coverage if the state continues to reject the Medicaid expansion. Meanwhile, Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant is willing to leave 300,000 of his neediest citizens uninsured. His reasoning? He’s afraid that the law might be repealed, leaving his state no way to meet its commitments — an ironic stance for a Republican to take, since they’re the ones trying to repeal it!

The 19 states that are refusing to expand Medicaid aren’t just leaving low-income Americans out to dry — they’re also leaving billions of health-care dollars on the table. While Bobby Jindal busies himself over a billboard, his state’s internal analysis found that Medicaid expansion would save Louisiana as much as $134 million in 2015 alone.

The real cost of Republican cruelty, however, cannot be measured in dollars and cents, but in people’s lives. Researchers at Harvard and the City University of New York concluded that without the Medicaid expansion, individuals will go without checkups, cancer screenings and treatment for diseases such as diabetes and depression — leading to thousands of premature and preventable deaths."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/katrina-vanden-heuvel-voters-should-know-who-is-holding-up-their-health-care/2014/03/25/fd649356-b39d-11e3-b899-20667de76985_story.html

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Cost of Cruelty: Republicans are scared to death of exposure of their Medicaid Death Panels (Original Post) Fred Sanders Mar 2014 OP
Yes. elleng Mar 2014 #1
K&R freshwest Mar 2014 #2
Tom Corbett is putting Pennsylvania citizens lives at risk, blue neen Mar 2014 #3
Where is Palin, she predicted the death panels, not because of the ACA but for the lack Thinkingabout Mar 2014 #4
Rethugs don't give a damn if the poor die. In fact they are probably glad because Auntie Bush Mar 2014 #5
They forgot Indiana. Brigid Mar 2014 #6

elleng

(130,908 posts)
1. Yes.
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 07:53 PM
Mar 2014

Gathered by researchers from Harvard University and the City University of New York, the estimates show that in the states that opted out of expanding Medicaid, 7,000-17,000 additional deaths will occur among people who would have been covered had expansion been supported.


All it takes is a little courage and a little exposure. Shame the blood and money thirsty media into reporting the obvious or risk smother Iraq war like debacle.

blue neen

(12,321 posts)
3. Tom Corbett is putting Pennsylvania citizens lives at risk,
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 10:32 PM
Mar 2014

and throwing away money. Just out of sheer hatred. Despicable.

"Dickman said other studies have looked at the financial consequence of forgoing the Medicaid expansion. For example, a RAND Corp. report last year said the federal government would have injected $2 billion this year into Pennsylvania if the state accepted the expansion plan as proposed under Obamacare."

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
4. Where is Palin, she predicted the death panels, not because of the ACA but for the lack
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 11:14 PM
Mar 2014

Of states refusing to take the Medicaid expansion and setting up state exchanges. There should be more billboards going up in every state where exchanges was not set up. Let the Republican leadership explain why their citizens was not able to participate in the exchanges. Let thm brag they would rather see more deaths due to their neglect. Yep, GOP death panels.

Auntie Bush

(17,528 posts)
5. Rethugs don't give a damn if the poor die. In fact they are probably glad because
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 11:44 PM
Mar 2014

that's less people to collect medicaid. If 10% die off...look at all the money they saved. And think of all the food stamps they can save. I started saying this in jest but now I think it's probably true.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Cost of Cruelty: Repu...