Ryan and the code words of race
By Suzanne Garment APRIL 10, 2014
Its official. The House of Representatives has passed the federal budget for fiscal years 2015 through 2023 that was submitted by the House Budget Committee a.k.a. the Ryan budget, after the Budget Committees chairman, Representative Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) and the troops are on the march.
The subject line of one e-mail from the Democratic Campaign Committees rapid response team is: 1,000,000 Strong Against the Ryan Budget. They are soliciting signatures to demand rejection of any Paul Ryan budget that puts Big Oil and billionaire tax breaks before the 47 percent. There will be an important debate, says Representative Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), ranking member on the Budget Committee, about the Ryan budgets lopsided set of priorities.
Van Hollen is right there will be a debate. But as we saw in the recent eruption over Ryans remarks about the absence of a work ethic in the nations inner cities, the debate will be obscured and twisted by the issue of race as it has been for the past 50 years. The conversation will be marked by familiar code words and formulas. It will do nothing to heal the endlessly searing wound that the Ryan controversy exposed in the individuals who bear it or make the wound more real to those who dont.
Earlier this month, Ryans committee accompanied the initial release of its budget resolution with a report, titled The War on Poverty: 50 Years Later. The document was well, skeptical about the past 50 years of federal anti-poverty policies. Soon after the report was published, in an interview with conservative commentator Bill Bennett, Ryan remarked that Bennetts buddies Charles Murray or Bob Putnam over at Harvard had written about a tailspin of culture in our inner cities, in particular of men not working or even thinking about working.
more
http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2014/04/10/ryan-and-the-familiar-code-words-on-race/