Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Smarmie Doofus

(14,498 posts)
Sat Apr 12, 2014, 09:43 AM Apr 2014

"Cuomo Caught Up in Rare Conflict With Prosecutor"

The national party ignores what's been going on in New York State at its own peril. There is something *seriously* wrong here.

This made page 1, NYT, yesterday.

Again: attention must be paid.

>>>>IRONDEQUOIT, N.Y. — An unusually public confrontation between two of the state’s most powerful officials escalated on Thursday. Preet Bharara, the United States attorney for the Southern District of New York, not known for engaging in on-air rebukes of elected officeholders, took aim at Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo over his decision to dissolve an anticorruption panel.

Mr. Bharara went on the radio to criticize Mr. Cuomo for quietly shutting down the panel, the Commission to Investigate Public Corruption. The governor had appointed the panel last year — with considerable celebration — to develop reforms to state law that would protect against corruption in Albany, a real-life petri dish for all manner of political malfeasance.

“If you begin investigations and you begin them with great fanfare,” Mr. Bharara said, “you don’t, I think, unceremoniously take them off the table without causing questions to be asked.”


It was a rare moment in which the governor, a former state attorney general who is accustomed to questioning others, found his own motives under scrutiny, and on a highly charged subject.



On Thursday, Mr. Cuomo — after giving a speech in this Rochester suburb — tried to play down the end of the panel, also known as the Moreland Commission, as an expected and inconsequential step. He said he never intended to create what he called “a perpetual bureaucracy” to investigate wrongdoing.

But the harsh glare on Mr. Cuomo, a Democrat, was largely of his own making. The governor, many lawmakers believe, had created the commission last July in a bid to burnish his image as a corruption buster. Instead, Mr. Bharara’s decision to inject himself into the issue put a spotlight on Mr. Cuomo’s tactics, not those of the rogue legislators originally targeted by the governor.>>>>

in its entirety:http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/11/nyregion/us-attorney-says-he-will-take-up-work-of-corruption-panel-cuomo-disbanded.html?_r=0

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

adirondacker

(2,921 posts)
1. I'm waiting for Cuomo to leap into the Lieberman Independant Party. (LIP, as in lip service to get
Sat Apr 12, 2014, 10:04 AM
Apr 2014

get elected). I couldn't think of a more appropriate place to use Sid's tagline image



 

Smarmie Doofus

(14,498 posts)
2. He actually has a DEM primary opponent who's website is here:
Sat Apr 12, 2014, 10:45 AM
Apr 2014
http://www.credico2014.com

I met the gentleman the other day at a political event. To say that his is a "protest" candidacy is to state the obvious, as one can easily discern from a quick website visit.

However: at another level he's dead serious, promising to withdraw if a more "electable" Democrat comes forth.

But the NYS party is like the Baath Party. No one's going to challenge the premier for fear of the repercussions. Not "possible" repercussions. *Repercussions*.

They are ( he is) going to come after you. No one seems to question this assumption.

But I wonder if this type of mentality could fuel the historic levels of corruption that we are seeing at the state level... and particularly among *Democrats* at the state level.

In other words: is there a *connection* between autocracy and party "discipline" ( i. e. monolithicism) as the guiding political philosophy of the Cuomo-era NYS Dem Party,on the one hand, and the

unprecedented corrosion of ethics and indeed, of the rule of law that we are seeing TODAY on the OTHER.?

Ya think?

adirondacker

(2,921 posts)
3. I think it's fairly disconcerting to see the power of Wall St corruption play out throughout the
Sat Apr 12, 2014, 11:21 AM
Apr 2014

party. If this is where the party is heading (headed) it's going to leave behind a LOT of discontent members.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024811375

Not exactly what the Democrats need in this cycle IMHO. I often wonder if the elected officials even give a shit about holding power or if they're narcissistic enough to only care about their own personal wealth.

Kudos to Credico for stirring the pot! I knew a Green party candidate was challenging the dark prince, but it's better to see someone from within the party to steer the debate. I remain a skeptic after seeing the damage inflicted on Spitzer for any real change (for the better).

Thanks for posting!


(I'm out for the day to enjoy the temps!

 

Smarmie Doofus

(14,498 posts)
4. The irony is though that w. this new SCOTUS ruling there's going to be a mad dash...
Sun Apr 13, 2014, 09:25 AM
Apr 2014

... to soak up as much corporate cash as possible. Even more than before.

Likely result is Gore Vidal's epigram come true: totalitarian state; one party, The Money Party, w. two right wings.

I guess that's really the whole idea.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Cuomo Caught Up in ...