General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"Cuomo Caught Up in Rare Conflict With Prosecutor"
The national party ignores what's been going on in New York State at its own peril. There is something *seriously* wrong here.
This made page 1, NYT, yesterday.
Again: attention must be paid.
>>>>IRONDEQUOIT, N.Y. An unusually public confrontation between two of the states most powerful officials escalated on Thursday. Preet Bharara, the United States attorney for the Southern District of New York, not known for engaging in on-air rebukes of elected officeholders, took aim at Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo over his decision to dissolve an anticorruption panel.
Mr. Bharara went on the radio to criticize Mr. Cuomo for quietly shutting down the panel, the Commission to Investigate Public Corruption. The governor had appointed the panel last year with considerable celebration to develop reforms to state law that would protect against corruption in Albany, a real-life petri dish for all manner of political malfeasance.
If you begin investigations and you begin them with great fanfare, Mr. Bharara said, you dont, I think, unceremoniously take them off the table without causing questions to be asked.
It was a rare moment in which the governor, a former state attorney general who is accustomed to questioning others, found his own motives under scrutiny, and on a highly charged subject.
On Thursday, Mr. Cuomo after giving a speech in this Rochester suburb tried to play down the end of the panel, also known as the Moreland Commission, as an expected and inconsequential step. He said he never intended to create what he called a perpetual bureaucracy to investigate wrongdoing.
But the harsh glare on Mr. Cuomo, a Democrat, was largely of his own making. The governor, many lawmakers believe, had created the commission last July in a bid to burnish his image as a corruption buster. Instead, Mr. Bhararas decision to inject himself into the issue put a spotlight on Mr. Cuomos tactics, not those of the rogue legislators originally targeted by the governor.>>>>
in its entirety:http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/11/nyregion/us-attorney-says-he-will-take-up-work-of-corruption-panel-cuomo-disbanded.html?_r=0
adirondacker
(2,921 posts)get elected). I couldn't think of a more appropriate place to use Sid's tagline image
Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)I met the gentleman the other day at a political event. To say that his is a "protest" candidacy is to state the obvious, as one can easily discern from a quick website visit.
However: at another level he's dead serious, promising to withdraw if a more "electable" Democrat comes forth.
But the NYS party is like the Baath Party. No one's going to challenge the premier for fear of the repercussions. Not "possible" repercussions. *Repercussions*.
They are ( he is) going to come after you. No one seems to question this assumption.
But I wonder if this type of mentality could fuel the historic levels of corruption that we are seeing at the state level... and particularly among *Democrats* at the state level.
In other words: is there a *connection* between autocracy and party "discipline" ( i. e. monolithicism) as the guiding political philosophy of the Cuomo-era NYS Dem Party,on the one hand, and the
unprecedented corrosion of ethics and indeed, of the rule of law that we are seeing TODAY on the OTHER.?
Ya think?
adirondacker
(2,921 posts)party. If this is where the party is heading (headed) it's going to leave behind a LOT of discontent members.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024811375
Not exactly what the Democrats need in this cycle IMHO. I often wonder if the elected officials even give a shit about holding power or if they're narcissistic enough to only care about their own personal wealth.
Kudos to Credico for stirring the pot! I knew a Green party candidate was challenging the dark prince, but it's better to see someone from within the party to steer the debate. I remain a skeptic after seeing the damage inflicted on Spitzer for any real change (for the better).
Thanks for posting!
(I'm out for the day to enjoy the temps!
Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)... to soak up as much corporate cash as possible. Even more than before.
Likely result is Gore Vidal's epigram come true: totalitarian state; one party, The Money Party, w. two right wings.
I guess that's really the whole idea.