Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TalkingDog

(9,001 posts)
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 09:08 PM Mar 2012

Good News! We can Nuke to our heart's content... "blast wouldn't destroy city"

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2012/03/27/national/w003933D74.DTL

Thinking about the unthinkable, a U.S. government study analyzed the likely effects from terrorists setting off a 10-kiloton nuclear device a few blocks north of the White House. It predicted terrible devastation for roughly one-half mile in every direction, with buildings reduced to rubble the way that World War II bombing raids destroyed parts of Berlin. But outside that blast zone, the study concluded, even such a nuclear explosion would be pretty survivable.

"It's not the end of the world," said Randy Larsen, a retired Air Force colonel and founding director of the Institute for Homeland Security. "It's not a Cold War scenario."

/snip

See? It's "pretty survivable".
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Good News! We can Nuke to our heart's content... "blast wouldn't destroy city" (Original Post) TalkingDog Mar 2012 OP
That's a pretty silly interpretation of the article. (nt) Posteritatis Mar 2012 #1
I prefer cynical. But thanks for playing along at home. TalkingDog Mar 2012 #2
10Kt is a baby bomb. hobbit709 Mar 2012 #3
Cool, grab a couple of hot dogs mindwalker_i Mar 2012 #4
Here's what a 15kt device can do. Angleae Mar 2012 #5

hobbit709

(41,694 posts)
3. 10Kt is a baby bomb.
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 09:19 PM
Mar 2012

I guarantee you that if you're within a quarter mile of large conventional bomb, you may not survive the blast either.
The article is technically correct in discussing blast effects. radiation burns are a different story.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Good News! We can Nuke to...