Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
Wed Apr 16, 2014, 03:21 PM Apr 2014

RT or Infowars? II (You be the judge...)

Today's installment is tougher than yesterday's. [font color=green]As always, this content is offered as an examination of journalism, not for the credibility of the content. Of course, nobody would post an article from Infowars or from Russia Today on Democratic Underground as something people should read for its content.[/font color]

NATO Announces It Will Deploy on Russia’s Border


NATO boss Anders Fogh Rasmussen has announced military alliance will move troops up to the Russian border in response to resistance by eastern Ukrainians to an operation by the coup government to shut down a secession movement in Donetsk, Slaviansk and other areas of the country.

The move by NATO arrives as the parliament in Transnistria on the Moldova-Ukraine border unanimously adopted a resolution calling for the international community to recognize it as a sovereign independent state. “According to the universally recognized norms of international law, a right of people to self-determination should be the basis of political decisions. Every state should respect this right,” said deputy speaker Sergei Cheban.

A 2006 referendum held in the region that broke away from Romanian-speaking Moldova after the collapse of the Soviet Union showed 97 percent of residents were in favor of independence. The referendum also indicated the majority is interested in joining the Russian Federation.

...

Ron Paul and others argue that economic sanctions are a form of warfare. Paul believes sanctions “are imposed by people looking to start a war” and moves by the United States and the European Union are “criminal, it’s stealing and will just aggravate things and escalate things. Sanctions are acts of war … to freeze assets if you’re at war with Hitler and there’s a declared war, that’s a little different, but to do this so easily and casually as we do, that’s just looking for a fight.”



This starts off as pretty dry. Russia Today, being a professional propaganda mouthpiece of the Russian government, is usually pretty well written, whereas this is kind of all over the place... but if it's Infowars, where are the chem-trails? And the shift from Ukraine to Moldova in the article seems so narrowly pro-Russian national interest (as opposed to anti-something else) that it's a toughie.

Troops moved to Russian border... Russia's border with Ukraine? Moldova? No, actually the NATO "aggression" is more ships in the Baltic sea and the Eastern Mediterranean. The Eastern Mediterranean is nowhere near any Russian border. The Baltic Sea does touch Russia in the Gulf of Finland, but Finland isn't a great staging area for NATO's nefarious actions in Ukraine. Again, this seems plausibly RT...

Can't these folks be more direct in their tells?

...Whoop, there it is! The excursion into alien-abduction journalism that makes Infowars so special. Ron Paul is cited as an authority on whether economic sanctions are warfare. It isn't that the point is crazy. It's a real argument to have. Historically, the line between sanctions and war has been hard to draw.

But why would anyone cite Ron Paul as an authority on difficult points of international law? Bingo! It's Infowars.


http://www.infowars.com/nato-announces-it-will-deploy-on-russias-border/
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
1. I think there is a hard restriction on linking to info wars site
Wed Apr 16, 2014, 03:23 PM
Apr 2014

just saying, unless this has been changed, it is not allowed.

herding cats

(19,564 posts)
2. It appears to be being used as an example of poor journalistic standards.
Wed Apr 16, 2014, 03:28 PM
Apr 2014

Rather than a source of facts and actual news. In this context I would assume it would not be wrong to link to it.

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
4. Two points. First, the hosts know this is not offered for the truth of the article
Wed Apr 16, 2014, 03:31 PM
Apr 2014

They are not stupid. It is an examination of the journalistic similarity of Russian propaganda from state-run media and the drivel from American psychos like Alex Jones, not presenting Infowars rantings as something for people to read for the credible information they include..

Second, the point of the post, and the similar post yesterday, is that GD is deluged with vomit from Russia Today while Infowars is obviously too crazy to post. It is noting an irony.

 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
8. Ok, but if you feel that strongly, maybe use ask the admin forum
Wed Apr 16, 2014, 03:49 PM
Apr 2014

to ask for RT to be banned from general discussion, it might prove more effective.

Personally, I like seeing news sources from foreign outlets. And if RT was banned, I would like to see Fox news banned as a source as well. But that is me.

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
10. I do not seek a ban, at all.
Wed Apr 16, 2014, 03:57 PM
Apr 2014

By noting the irony, I didn't mean the irony of RT not being banned. I mean the irony of everyone knowing how comical Infowars is, while RT is presented as the real deal.

I am not much about banning stuff. I have no opinion on Inforwars being banned in GD, or much of anything being banned in GD. That is up to the site owners.

I don't seek RT banned in GD, though the fact it is banned in Breaking News is essential, since that forum is supposed to be limited to legit journalism. GD is not limited to legit journalism. (Where would GD be without the Daily Mail?)

I do, however, think that RT should widely be seen for what it is... a propaganda organ of the Russian government.

 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
11. Ok, but just realize that some can understand that, and still not write off RT completely
Wed Apr 16, 2014, 04:01 PM
Apr 2014

not everything has to be seen in black and white. There are shades of gray to just about everything.

For instance, I have seen progressive tinted stories on RT, that you would never see in the mainstream news here in the corporate controlled USA...

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
12. Of course there are some valid things
Wed Apr 16, 2014, 04:19 PM
Apr 2014

The whole point of RT is to co-opt he American left, and that cannot be done without some worthwhile appeal to the American left.

And know they are cashing in their chips. Their investment is returning dividends in the form of some on the American left actually not getting that they have been played.

American government funded international media is the same. It's not all worthless. It is fine a lot of the time... even objective a lot of the time... just not on any topic of vital national interest to the USA.

If there was NO reason to watch, it would fail at its job.

Hell, Tokyo Rose played good music. (For real. By all accounts the Japanese disinformation radio was an excellent music channel. But everyone knew the periodic "war news" was bullshit, and why.)

Anything RT says about Ukraine or Syria is being said only because it promotes the Russian government's interests. If it did not, it would not be said.

Then people say, but this datum is true, and that datum is true. Well, yeah... just like Colin Powell at the UN. Many things he said were true. Propaganda is an editor's medium. It is largely about viewpoint through selection of data.

questionseverything

(9,655 posts)
9. rt is no worse than our msm
Wed Apr 16, 2014, 03:55 PM
Apr 2014

As we noted on Friday, when we also published the report's disturbing conclusions [PDF], the 6,600-page study, based on first-hand CIA documentation, reveals massive illegalities and war crimes by everyone from CIA contractors to agents to higher level officials at that agency and others.

The report is said to detail wide-spread crimes that are not only in violation of U.S. law, but also international laws which our nation has an obligation to enforce, thanks to treaties we have long been a party to. And, if we don't enforce those laws and hold the criminals accountable for lawlessness such as torture, all the rest of the nations signed on to such treaties along with us, such as the UN Convention against Torture, have a legal obligation to do so.

The prohibition against torture under that treaty is absolute for all nations. "No exceptional circumstances whatsoever, whether a state of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or any other public emergency, may be invoked as a justification of torture," according to Article 2 of the treaty.

All of that comes on the heels of revelations that the CIA itself had used the computers of the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee in an attempt to sabotage the committee's report.

Yet, with a report that important and a story that big, not a single U.S. network "news" show on Sunday found the time to even mention the report. Not NBC's Meet the Press with David Gregory, not ABC's This Week with George Stephanopoulos, not CBS' Face the Nation with Bob Schieffer, not Fox "News" Sunday with Chris Wallace.

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,182 posts)
6. Regarding the seperation of government and private business.
Wed Apr 16, 2014, 03:35 PM
Apr 2014

There are some things that I firmly believe the private sector should never control, and that should always be in the complete control of the public government. For example, police departments and fire departments. I might argue health care as well, but we've got a ways go to on convincing that still.


That being said, there are a couple of things that government should never control, and should always remain in private hands. One being religion, and the other being the media.

Because when you think government controlled media, what you get is RT.

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
7. Not me! I get all my news from Radio Marti.
Wed Apr 16, 2014, 03:37 PM
Apr 2014

Kidding, of course, but can you imagine what the useful idiots would say about someone posting Radio Marti content and blathering about how they have found it to be one of the most credible news sources?

muriel_volestrangler

(101,320 posts)
13. Why would anyone cite Ron Paul as an authority on difficult points of international law?
Wed Apr 16, 2014, 04:38 PM
Apr 2014

We'd better ask RT:

Ron Paul on Crimea: None of America’s business

​Ron Paul is once again speaking up about the situation in Crimea, and this time the former congressman is condemning critics from his own country who are seemingly obsessed with the recent secession.

The former Republican representative for Texas told RT earlier this month that he didn’t think the United States had any business meddling in overseas affairs and that worsening tensions in Ukraine should be resolved only by those directly involved. The citizens of Crimea have since approved a referendum to separate from Ukraine, but both the US and European Union responded with sanctions against certain officials from Russia and the former Ukrainian government as a result.
...
Speaking to RT only a few weeks earlier, Paul said that “this idea that we are going to start bailing out Ukraine is total nonsense” and that “the whole thing makes no sense whatsoever from an economic viewpoint [or] from a political viewpoint.” The US has since escalated efforts to assist the interim Ukrainian government and at the same time attempt to punish Moscow, however, and now Paul writes that “neither the US nor the EU can afford significant sanctions against Russia.”

“Global trade provides too much economic benefit to both sides,” he wrote. “Indeed, international markets rallied on news that the sanctions would be thus far minimal. They understand that trade and economic engagement are the surest roads to peace and prosperity. Let's hope governments will follow their lead.”

http://rt.com/usa/ron-paul-crimea-secedes-610/


I'm not sure your 'tell' is that reliable.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»RT or Infowars? II (You b...