General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWarren's Book Portrays Tense Meeting With Obama Over CFPB Nod (updated)
Last edited Wed Apr 16, 2014, 07:09 PM - Edit history (1)
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) got into a tense exchange with President Barack Obama when the president asked her to help set up the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau alongside then-Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, a longtime rival who did not support Warren's nomination to run the organization.
"You're jamming me, Elizabeth," Obama said, as recounted in Warren's new memoir, "A Fighting Chance." Excerpts of the book were reported by The Boston Globe on Wednesday. Obama had asked to meet with Warren privately in September 2010.
Warren at first said she did not want to help set up the agency in a conversation that she describes as lasting over an hour -- interrupted twice by aides who reminded Obama he had other meetings.
"He urged me not to overplay my hand," Warren wrote in the new book. "Got it."
"Sometimes you have to trust the president," Obama said in the meeting. "Let me work this out."
Obama won out in the end and Warren agreed to help.
"All right," Warren said, according to the book. "I'll trust you on this."
- more -
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/elizabeth-warren-obama-tense-memoir-a-fighting-chance
So much for the claim that Warren wanted the job. President Obama had to beg her to take it.
Updated to add:
When she finally accepted the presidents request, the task before her felt massive. The creation of the consumer bureau faced fierce backlash from Republicans lawmakers and the financial services industry, which was armed with lobbyists dispatched all over Capitol Hill.
The job also required her to report directly to then-Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner. Warren and Geithner hadnt always seen eye to eye on issues He and I just didnt see banking the same way and she had reservations about how they would work together.
But Warren says Geithner not only publicly backed her against attacks, he also defended her in private...When another publication ran a story the next day titled, Are Treasurys Knives Coming Out Against Elizabeth Warren? detailing a series of leaks from Treasury that had come out since Warren had arrived, Geithner reached out to her.
He was direct: Im sorry about the story about painting your office, Warren writes. He told me there would never be another nasty leak about me while I was trying to do my job.
Warren says she doesnt know what Geithner did, but the leaks stopped.
- more -
http://www.politico.com/story/2014/04/elizabeth-warren-105766.html
http://www.warren.senate.gov/files/documents/AFR%20Roosevelt%20Institute%20Speech%202013-11-12.pdf
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024812296
ProSense
(116,464 posts)Crickets?
calimary
(81,304 posts)Thank GOD there's an Elizabeth Warren at the cutting edge of this issue!
ProSense
(116,464 posts)WhiteTara
(29,718 posts)calimary
(81,304 posts)She's my kind of representative!
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I respect Sen. Warren profusely, and I haven't seen a ton of evidence that she and the Administration are fundamentally at odds on most issues.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)the economic policies that have DU most outraged are the same policies that EW voted for/has vocally supported.
Go figure.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)If one wants to go by sheer volume in GD, a photo of 3 women in bathing suits is a far greater offense to the human race than Russia annexing Crimea.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)but take anything economic, put President Obama's name on it/next to it/on the same page as it and watch the explosion
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Don't worry. In the unfortunate eventuality of another GOP asshat in the White House, you will once again see unprecedented DU unity.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)but I don't think the trade off is worth it!
Get Out The Democratic Vote in 2014, and beyond!
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)every time the president pushes a fucked up policy, domestic or otherwise.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)supports, and/or voted for, but without the explosion?
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)and objective thing. It either benefits me or it is not, regardless of who supports or condemns it.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)there are many her (I believe, you included) condemn President Obama for a policy that you perceive to not benefit you; WHILE PRAISING (not being critical of) Elizabeth Warren, despite her supporting/voting for that same policy.
steve2470
(37,457 posts)JI7
(89,251 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)there will be a rush to assert that she really did want the job of setting up the Unit; but not under the terms presented ... after all Geithner and others didn't support her, or they wanted her to be a "cheerleader" (I suppose that means window dressing) and she wasn't having it!
Never mind that President Obama, was on her side.
steve2470
(37,457 posts)Cha
(297,275 posts)you're welcome.
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)PragmaticLiberal
(904 posts)I hope I'm wrong....
Cha
(297,275 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)PragmaticLiberal
(904 posts)I was hoping to see many of Elizabeth's supporters post in this thread but that doesn't seem to be the case.
Oh well, it is what it is....
ProSense
(116,464 posts)Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)!!
nikto
(3,284 posts)That's established.
nikto
(3,284 posts)...Sure wasn't able, via his own Attorney General, to prosecute even 1 soul on Wall St for their financial malfeasance,
and appointed Wall street's own to watch over them;
Mr. Not-Corporatist" pushes for Public School privatization thru "Race To The Top" and the ongoing efforts of
Ed Sec Arnie Duncan, former fund manager;
Mr. "Not-Corporatist" may well support the Keystone Pipeline, the Koch Bros wet-dream, though
he is unable to give a straight, "no" answer, even at this late date;
Mr. "Not-Corporatist" has an active drone-assassination program, using high-tech product$ to join-in that
Corporate feeding-trough called "The War On Terror".
Mr. "Not-Corporatist" enshrined Insurance Company profits into Heritage Foundation-created ACA, and conspicuously avoided Single Payer, and even eliminated the Public Option as a part of the program.
Mr. "Not-Corporatist" continues to push for big Trade deals that favor corporate elites over everyone else.
I voted for Obama. I like the guy. I hate his hypocritical, mud-slinging opposition in the GOP.
But Pres Obama has strong Corporatist leanings, and languaging, in spite of his moderation on social issues, and soaring rhetoric about America, like right here: (watch from 10:56 to 12:41 AND 13:03 to 13:34):
If Obama is not at all a Corporatist, then he somehow still manages to make a pretty good corporate surrogate,
in a number of policy areas.
Sure wish we could get a "Not-Progressive" president cast in a similar mold.
Cha
(297,275 posts)I don't care that he's not perfect. I am appreciative of all the good he's accomplished since he's been in Office.
And, he can sling it to the goddamn republiCONS.. any time he effin' well pleases.
nikto
(3,284 posts)Last edited Thu Apr 17, 2014, 04:53 PM - Edit history (1)
Response to nikto (Reply #39)
nikto This message was self-deleted by its author.
sheshe2
(83,785 posts)Arkana
(24,347 posts)that Obama "forced her out".
JI7
(89,251 posts)shows how full of shit they are.
if i truly believed that had happened and was upset by it and found this out i would be happy to be wrong and admit to it.
but they will just make up some other bs.
mcar
(42,334 posts)Thanks!
Raine1967
(11,589 posts)I know I am!
I am so happy that we have her as a public servant. This OP just makes me more happy.
to Senator Warren and to President Obama!
JI7
(89,251 posts)as opposed to those who only use her to attack other democrats.