Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Wed Apr 16, 2014, 05:01 PM Apr 2014

Warren's Book Portrays Tense Meeting With Obama Over CFPB Nod (updated)

Last edited Wed Apr 16, 2014, 07:09 PM - Edit history (1)

Warren's Book Portrays Tense Meeting With Obama Over CFPB Nod

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) got into a tense exchange with President Barack Obama when the president asked her to help set up the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau alongside then-Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, a longtime rival who did not support Warren's nomination to run the organization.

"You're jamming me, Elizabeth," Obama said, as recounted in Warren's new memoir, "A Fighting Chance." Excerpts of the book were reported by The Boston Globe on Wednesday. Obama had asked to meet with Warren privately in September 2010.

Warren at first said she did not want to help set up the agency in a conversation that she describes as lasting over an hour -- interrupted twice by aides who reminded Obama he had other meetings.

"He urged me not to overplay my hand," Warren wrote in the new book. "Got it."

"Sometimes you have to trust the president," Obama said in the meeting. "Let me work this out."

Obama won out in the end and Warren agreed to help.

"All right," Warren said, according to the book. "I'll trust you on this."

- more -

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/elizabeth-warren-obama-tense-memoir-a-fighting-chance

So much for the claim that Warren wanted the job. President Obama had to beg her to take it.

Updated to add:

<...>

When she finally accepted the president’s request, the task before her felt massive. The creation of the consumer bureau faced fierce backlash from Republicans lawmakers and the financial services industry, which was armed with lobbyists dispatched all over Capitol Hill.

The job also required her to report directly to then-Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner. Warren and Geithner hadn’t always seen eye to eye on issues – “He and I just didn’t see banking the same way” – and she had reservations about how they would work together.

But Warren says Geithner not only publicly backed her against attacks, he also defended her in private...When another publication ran a story the next day titled, “Are Treasury’s Knives Coming Out Against Elizabeth Warren?” detailing a series of leaks from Treasury that had come out since Warren had arrived, Geithner reached out to her.

“He was direct: I’m sorry about the story about painting your office,” Warren writes. “He told me there would never be another nasty leak about me while I was trying to do my job.”

Warren says she doesn’t know what Geithner did, but the leaks stopped.

- more -

http://www.politico.com/story/2014/04/elizabeth-warren-105766.html


There is no question that Dodd-Frank was a strong bill—the strongest in three generations. I didn’t have a chance to vote for it because I wasn’t yet in the Senate, but if I could have, I would have voted for it twice.

http://www.warren.senate.gov/files/documents/AFR%20Roosevelt%20Institute%20Speech%202013-11-12.pdf

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024812296

47 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Warren's Book Portrays Tense Meeting With Obama Over CFPB Nod (updated) (Original Post) ProSense Apr 2014 OP
Kick! ProSense Apr 2014 #1
None here! calimary Apr 2014 #2
Agree, the CFPB got off to a great start as a result. n/t ProSense Apr 2014 #7
Elizabeth Warren for Senate Majority Leader! nt WhiteTara Apr 2014 #11
Wouldn't that be sweet? calimary Apr 2014 #19
Doesn't support the "adversarial relationship" meme that gets pushed. JoePhilly Apr 2014 #9
I sometimes think these alleged divisions are spun through the DU funhouse mirror. Warren DeMontague Apr 2014 #3
True ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2014 #6
I can't really speak to what constitutes "outrage" for some or most of DU. Warren DeMontague Apr 2014 #8
True ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2014 #10
Yeah, I hear you. Warren DeMontague Apr 2014 #15
Thank you ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2014 #24
And explode it should sulphurdunn Apr 2014 #18
F'd up policies that Elizabeth Warren ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2014 #25
A political policy is sulphurdunn Apr 2014 #26
Yet ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2014 #31
so true nt steve2470 Apr 2014 #12
lies about this had been spread for years JI7 Apr 2014 #4
Just give it time ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2014 #5
kick and rec ! nt steve2470 Apr 2014 #13
Really good to know, PS.. thank you! Cha Apr 2014 #14
Hey, ProSense Apr 2014 #32
KICK! Cha Apr 2014 #34
K&R Jamaal510 Apr 2014 #16
Now watch this thread disappear. PragmaticLiberal Apr 2014 #17
I'll just kick again! :) Cha Apr 2014 #20
Not wrong. n/t ProSense Apr 2014 #33
Yep. PragmaticLiberal Apr 2014 #42
LOL! n/t ProSense Apr 2014 #45
K/R Jack Rabbit Apr 2014 #21
OK, so Obama's a corporatist, and Warren isn't nikto Apr 2014 #22
NO it's not. Cha Apr 2014 #35
Mr. "Not-Corporatist", a product of the U of Chicago... nikto Apr 2014 #36
So? President Obama is for the people. He has my back and I have his. Cha Apr 2014 #38
So you AGREE with the policies I've listed? nikto Apr 2014 #39
This message was self-deleted by its author nikto Apr 2014 #44
K&R! Owl Apr 2014 #23
Oh yes! KnR!!! sheshe2 Apr 2014 #27
And yet this will somehow not put paid to those goddamn rumors Arkana Apr 2014 #28
they don't even want to acknowledge this JI7 Apr 2014 #43
Very interesting mcar Apr 2014 #29
Warren supporters should be happy to see this thread! Raine1967 Apr 2014 #30
i'm sure those who actually support her are happy JI7 Apr 2014 #46
K&R! nt SunsetDreams Apr 2014 #37
KICK! Cha Apr 2014 #40
Kick! n/t ProSense Apr 2014 #41
Holy shit! I called it! joshcryer Apr 2014 #47

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
3. I sometimes think these alleged divisions are spun through the DU funhouse mirror.
Wed Apr 16, 2014, 05:19 PM
Apr 2014

I respect Sen. Warren profusely, and I haven't seen a ton of evidence that she and the Administration are fundamentally at odds on most issues.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
6. True ...
Wed Apr 16, 2014, 05:24 PM
Apr 2014

the economic policies that have DU most outraged are the same policies that EW voted for/has vocally supported.

Go figure.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
8. I can't really speak to what constitutes "outrage" for some or most of DU.
Wed Apr 16, 2014, 05:28 PM
Apr 2014

If one wants to go by sheer volume in GD, a photo of 3 women in bathing suits is a far greater offense to the human race than Russia annexing Crimea.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
10. True ...
Wed Apr 16, 2014, 06:00 PM
Apr 2014

but take anything economic, put President Obama's name on it/next to it/on the same page as it and watch the explosion

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
15. Yeah, I hear you.
Wed Apr 16, 2014, 06:15 PM
Apr 2014

Don't worry. In the unfortunate eventuality of another GOP asshat in the White House, you will once again see unprecedented DU unity.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
24. Thank you ...
Wed Apr 16, 2014, 07:06 PM
Apr 2014

but I don't think the trade off is worth it!

Get Out The Democratic Vote in 2014, and beyond!

 

sulphurdunn

(6,891 posts)
26. A political policy is
Wed Apr 16, 2014, 07:18 PM
Apr 2014

and objective thing. It either benefits me or it is not, regardless of who supports or condemns it.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
31. Yet ...
Wed Apr 16, 2014, 08:07 PM
Apr 2014

there are many her (I believe, you included) condemn President Obama for a policy that you perceive to not benefit you; WHILE PRAISING (not being critical of) Elizabeth Warren, despite her supporting/voting for that same policy.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
5. Just give it time ...
Wed Apr 16, 2014, 05:22 PM
Apr 2014

there will be a rush to assert that she really did want the job of setting up the Unit; but not under the terms presented ... after all Geithner and others didn't support her, or they wanted her to be a "cheerleader" (I suppose that means window dressing) and she wasn't having it!

Never mind that President Obama, was on her side.

PragmaticLiberal

(904 posts)
42. Yep.
Thu Apr 17, 2014, 10:23 AM
Apr 2014

I was hoping to see many of Elizabeth's supporters post in this thread but that doesn't seem to be the case.


Oh well, it is what it is....

 

nikto

(3,284 posts)
36. Mr. "Not-Corporatist", a product of the U of Chicago...
Thu Apr 17, 2014, 04:22 AM
Apr 2014

...Sure wasn't able, via his own Attorney General, to prosecute even 1 soul on Wall St for their financial malfeasance,
and appointed Wall street's own to watch over them;
Mr. Not-Corporatist" pushes for Public School privatization thru "Race To The Top" and the ongoing efforts of
Ed Sec Arnie Duncan, former fund manager;
Mr. "Not-Corporatist" may well support the Keystone Pipeline, the Koch Bros wet-dream, though
he is unable to give a straight, "no" answer, even at this late date;
Mr. "Not-Corporatist" has an active drone-assassination program, using high-tech product$ to join-in that
Corporate feeding-trough called "The War On Terror".
Mr. "Not-Corporatist" enshrined Insurance Company profits into Heritage Foundation-created ACA, and conspicuously avoided Single Payer, and even eliminated the Public Option as a part of the program.
Mr. "Not-Corporatist" continues to push for big Trade deals that favor corporate elites over everyone else.

I voted for Obama. I like the guy. I hate his hypocritical, mud-slinging opposition in the GOP.

But Pres Obama has strong Corporatist leanings, and languaging, in spite of his moderation on social issues, and soaring rhetoric about America, like right here: (watch from 10:56 to 12:41 AND 13:03 to 13:34):



If Obama is not at all a Corporatist, then he somehow still manages to make a pretty good corporate surrogate,
in a number of policy areas.



Sure wish we could get a "Not-Progressive" president cast in a similar mold.

Cha

(297,275 posts)
38. So? President Obama is for the people. He has my back and I have his.
Thu Apr 17, 2014, 04:57 AM
Apr 2014

I don't care that he's not perfect. I am appreciative of all the good he's accomplished since he's been in Office.

And, he can sling it to the goddamn republiCONS.. any time he effin' well pleases.

Response to nikto (Reply #39)

JI7

(89,251 posts)
43. they don't even want to acknowledge this
Thu Apr 17, 2014, 04:12 PM
Apr 2014

shows how full of shit they are.

if i truly believed that had happened and was upset by it and found this out i would be happy to be wrong and admit to it.

but they will just make up some other bs.

Raine1967

(11,589 posts)
30. Warren supporters should be happy to see this thread!
Wed Apr 16, 2014, 08:06 PM
Apr 2014

I know I am!

I am so happy that we have her as a public servant. This OP just makes me more happy.

to Senator Warren and to President Obama!

JI7

(89,251 posts)
46. i'm sure those who actually support her are happy
Thu Apr 17, 2014, 11:29 PM
Apr 2014

as opposed to those who only use her to attack other democrats.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Warren's Book Portrays Te...