Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,677 posts)
Wed Apr 16, 2014, 06:36 PM Apr 2014

"Supreme Court To Consider Ohio Ban On Campaign Lies"

Supreme Court To Consider Ohio Ban On Campaign Lies

by HOPE YEN and SAM HANANEL at the Huffington Post

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/16/supreme-court-campaign-lies_n_5158964.html?utm_hp_ref=politics

"SNIP......................


WASHINGTON (AP) — As political campaigns begin to heat up, the Supreme Court is deciding whether false accusations and mudslinging made during an election can be punished as a crime.

Addressing an issue of negative campaigning that now may be a fact of life in American politics, justices will consider a challenge to an Ohio law that bars false statements about political candidates. The case being heard next week has attracted national attention, with least 15 other states having similar laws.

Groups across the political spectrum are criticizing the law as a restriction on the First Amendment right to free speech.

Even Ohio's attorney general, Republican Mike DeWine, says he has serious concerns about the law. His office filed two briefs in the case, one from staff lawyers obligated to defend the state and another expressing DeWine's personal view that the law "may chill constitutionally protected political speech."



......................SNIP"
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Supreme Court To Consider Ohio Ban On Campaign Lies" (Original Post) applegrove Apr 2014 OP
Knowing this SCOTUS... Prophet 451 Apr 2014 #1
I expect them to outlaw truthful statements. Motown_Johnny Apr 2014 #5
That law seems pretty plainly unconstitutional tritsofme Apr 2014 #2
It's an awful law that certainly violates the First Amendment. Nye Bevan Apr 2014 #3
I believe it would just shift the adds to the PACs to run Victor_c3 Apr 2014 #4

Prophet 451

(9,796 posts)
1. Knowing this SCOTUS...
Wed Apr 16, 2014, 07:15 PM
Apr 2014

...I fully expect a decisions that you're allowed to lie your ass off about the other guy but only if he's a Democrat.

tritsofme

(17,379 posts)
2. That law seems pretty plainly unconstitutional
Wed Apr 16, 2014, 07:54 PM
Apr 2014

Determining the veracity of political statements will necessarily be political.

I am certainly not comfortable with government acting as the arbiter of truth.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
3. It's an awful law that certainly violates the First Amendment.
Thu Apr 17, 2014, 12:01 AM
Apr 2014

Very rarely are such statements demonstrably absolutely true or false. There are half-truths, statements that are true but misleading, statements that are open to differing intetpretations, and so on. For example, imagine a billboard that says "Bush lied us into war" banned on the grounds that this statement is not literally true, notwithstanding the web of deceit that was spun.

Victor_c3

(3,557 posts)
4. I believe it would just shift the adds to the PACs to run
Thu Apr 17, 2014, 04:51 AM
Apr 2014

The "real" campaigns wouldn't do the dirty work, they'd leave that to the various political action committees. Then the PACs would just say it's satire and they'd be off the hook completely.

Hey, it's just a joke. The Onion does it! Saturday Night Live does it too!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Supreme Court To Co...