General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsK&R if you intend to keep fighting for single payer regardless what the SCOTUS rules.
I am tired of seeing people feel like giving up.
The battle started with Occupy and will continue as long as we all want to fight for what is right and just.
[img][/img]
liberal N proud
(60,347 posts)Ian David
(69,059 posts)polichick
(37,152 posts)...against the current approach.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)should ever give up.
Still, consider the expansion of Medicaid under the health care law.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002483563
yesphan
(1,588 posts)Lugnut
(9,791 posts)shrdlu
(487 posts)...not health insurance, should be the objective. As long as for-profit insurance is in the mix meaningful reform is very unlikely.
libtodeath
(2,888 posts)we must change the narrative so that insurance is not the accepted normal.
loudsue
(14,087 posts)altogether. They're an abomination, in the big scheme of things.
If we really started hitting hardest on the insurance companies, either the rest of the country would get on board, in spite of the propaganda, or the insurance companies would be frightened into acting more responsibly, rather than be shuttered altogether.
TahitiNut
(71,611 posts)If the corporate "people" needed medical care (instead of mere transfusions of cash) we'd be awash in single-payer. But, it deserves mentioning, corporate "people" HAVE single-payer corporate health care in the form of bailouts and the tax code.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)number of people control it and there's no real competition. That in combination with mandated purchase = no control on prices, sellers free to charge whatever the hell they like.
"A major cause of these burdensome premium hikes is the tremendous monopolies enjoyed by insurance companies across the country. Two large insurance companies cornered 98% of the market in Hawaii 2007. In California, the most competitive of the states surveyed, two insurance companies controlled 44% of the market. All across the United States, these insurers have no incentive to negotiate lower premiums because, like any monopoly, they know they are the only game in town."
http://www.cnbc.com/id/32918263
bowens43
(16,064 posts)adigal
(7,581 posts)newspeak
(4,847 posts)that other industrialized nations appear to understand. They actually care about their fellow citizens. I think this country cares more about greed. When ceos are paid 400 times the employee (not seen in other industrialized nations), then we have a major problem of what it means to be a responsible member of society.
my hubby's right wing cousin married a canadian. Last time he visited, my jaw dropped. He talked about how he got paid more in canada and how he will never have to worry about healthcare. Before that visit, he still had the "everyone for themselves", ayn randian mindset.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)would prove to be grossly inadequate and ultimately fail, and that would be a huge driver toward Single Payer. As the fixes they put in place merely prove to increase medical insurer profits, and more and more people face medical bankruptcy in spite of being insured, the system will collapse of its own weight and the majority will be SCREAMING for Single Payer.
I hope to see it in my lifetime. I make sure whenever the topic comes up in conversation that I put in a plug for Single Payer - my clients are always complaining about their crappy, expensive insurance plans, and then I tell them I am among the uninsured, and the wheels in their little heads really start turning.
Lots of people are open to the idea now, and it's only going to get more popular as everything involving medical insurance for profit goes to sh-t.
Fix The Stupid
(949 posts)Keep up the good fight.
Single payer is the only way.
Profit must be taken out of Healthcare.
byronius
(7,402 posts)I won't give up.
ProgressiveATL
(50 posts)Roughly one out of two people access health insurance through employer. In 2000, it was two out of three people. Huge drop, and that trend continues. Much of the slack is and will continue to be picked up by government-funded programs, and that need will continue to grow. At some point it, this unworkable system will collapse and a national pooling of risk (medicare-for-all) will be the only workable solution. Because of rising insurance costs, that might well happen within a decade or two.
40 million were without health insurance when all the new plan talk started a few years ago. I've read estimates it's up to about 80 million now, folks without any or with far too little health insurance.
And by 2033, health insurance premiums will surpass household income: http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=155840
And as recently as 1989, conservatives were for a "socialist" single-payer solution too:
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/03/27/why-the-right-turned-its-back-on-the-individual-mandate.html
There is an implicit contract between households in society, based on the notion that health insurance is not like other forms of insurance protection. If a young man wrecks his Porsche and does not have the foresight to obtain insurance, we may commiserate but society feels no obligation to repair his car. Healthcare is different. If a man is struck down by a heart attack in the street, Americans will care for him whether or not he has insurance. If we find that he has spent his money on other things rather than insurance, we may be angry but we will not deny him services even if that means more prudent citizens end up paying the tab
A mandate on individuals recognizes this implicit contract.
Two-thirds of Americans support Medicare-for-all: http://pnhp.org/blog/2009/12/09/two-thirds-support-3/
"The more people know about single-payer, the more likely they are to support it. We see this pattern when we compare the jury results with poll results, and we see it when we compare polls that show high levels of support for single-payer with those that dont."
It's time for a single-payer variant.
ProgressiveATL
(50 posts)abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)It's inevitable but will certainly keep fighting for it.
villager
(26,001 posts)...which is probably the battle now, regardless of the eventual SCOTUS ruling...
libtodeath
(2,888 posts)Cleita
(75,480 posts)ClassWarrior
(26,316 posts)Never Give Up.
lsewpershad
(2,620 posts)librechik
(30,677 posts)Granny M
(1,395 posts)Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)Private health insurance has a history of being not legitimate business, but a racket.
Medicare for all!
tcaudilllg
(1,553 posts)Co-ops are a better way.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)strike down the law itself, than the GOP will own it. The GOP will be portrayed and even more so "focused" that they are in general selfish and non-caring assholes and will put first their party before the welfare of the America public.
Highlighted:
- Gore vs. Bush
- No more Class Actions against businesses
- Citizen United
et al.,
Justice C. Thomas and Salia(sp?) should have recused themselves.
Rhiannon12866
(206,277 posts)eridani
(51,907 posts)I think the next battle is at the state level, though.
Chorophyll
(5,179 posts)No reason to give up.
TriMera
(1,375 posts)Vincardog
(20,234 posts)hwmnbn
(4,279 posts)RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)patrice
(47,992 posts)kenny blankenship
(15,689 posts)Single Payer or Die.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Uncle Joe
(58,458 posts)Thanks for the thread, libtodeath.
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)Though those that would cheer Aca dying are fools and tools.
TheKentuckian
(25,029 posts)We have little "side" in a battle between the quick fortune greedy fucks and the longview greedy fucks in the insurance cartel.
That is going on in this battle, it is all about squeeze us for every thing they can until the well goes dry or squeeze a little less, get damn near either 100% participation or free money for not even printing an ID card, along with a shitload of government cash to make up the difference between what they want to charge and what many can pay, slyly in exchange for taking our money.
goclark
(30,404 posts)Volaris
(10,275 posts)donheld
(21,311 posts)Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)Single-payer is the only logical solution. No one should be denied health care simply because they're poor or sick. But no one should be forced to enrich private insurance companies either. I can understand the opposition to the mandate from that standpoint. Health care should be a government-run program like schools or public safety. I wouldn't mind paying more taxes to ensure that everyone could get the care they need. And private health care could still be available for those who wanted to pay extra for it, over and above their tax obligation.
I guess I'm a socialist.
Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)DesertFlower
(11,649 posts)mahina
(17,715 posts)me b zola
(19,053 posts)caseymoz
(5,763 posts)lovemydog
(11,833 posts)I'm not easily distracted or discouraged!
onestepforward
(3,691 posts)Esse Quam Videri
(685 posts)Lifelong Protester
(8,421 posts)If so, K & R from me.
chazzio
(26 posts)Tippy
(4,610 posts)bigwillq
(72,790 posts)mmonk
(52,589 posts)libtodeath
(2,888 posts)That is true if we dont keep fighting.
thucythucy
(8,097 posts)that Democrats could take, assuming the USSC does its usual suck-up to the far right, would be to file legislation dropping the eligibility for Medicare to age 55. This was actually under consideration during the debate in 2009, and looked like it had a chance, until Senator Leiberman (I-Insurance industry) said he'd kill it, no matter what.
The reason for his opposing the measure is precisely the reason we should support it. He and others saw this as the "foot in the door" for single payer, in that once millions of people signed into Medicare (offering better care at lower cost than for-profit insurance) there would be an enormous new demographic in support of a single-payer type system. Lower the eligibility age to 55 (which also solves Medicare's alleged solvency issues) and there would be immediate pressure to lower the eligibility age to 50, 45, 40....
This measure would also have huge popular support, especially if it's tied in to the idea of making Medicare more solvent (by bringing younger, healthier people into the system, thus broadening its financial base).
And of course, K & R.