How to Criticize "Big Philanthropy" Effectively
http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/23131-how-to-criticize-big-philanthropy-effectively
Bill Gates attends the Clinton Global Initiative Annual Meeting at The Shertaon New York Hotel on September 24, 2013 in New York City. (JStone / Shutterstock.com)
***SNIP
Challenge: You seem to believe that ed-reform philanthropy is some sort of nefarious conspiracy. Here we go again with conspiracy theories.
Response: By definition conspiracies are secret and illegal. The ed-reform movement isnt a conspiracy. When people or organizations work together politically in a democracy, its a coalition or movement. This is true even whenas is the case with the ed-reform movementhuge amounts of money are being spent by mega-foundations and private meetings take place.
Challenge: You wrongly depict the ed-reform movement and the foundations involved as homogeneous, with everyone marching in lockstep. The movement is actually very heterogeneous and rife with disagreements.
Response: Coalitions and movements are rarely, if ever, completely homogeneous. Yet their members agree generally on basic principles and goals. Thats how they make progress. The ed-reform movement is no different. The most significant policy difference among ed-reform foundations is on vouchersthe per-pupil funding that parents can transfer from a district public school to a private school, often including religious schools. Some foundations, for example, Walton, support vouchers; others, for example, Gates and Broad, do not. Aside from vouchers, theres much agreement among the ed reformers on broad policy questions as well as principles and goals.
Challenge: You constantly impugn the motives of the mega-foundations. Do you really think Melinda Gates or Eli Broad wants to hurt children?
Response: Of course, the philanthropists aim to do good, but they define good for themselves and others. The directors of the Walton Foundation, for example, believe that school vouchers will improve education. By supporting vouchers, they believe, and claim, they are doing good. So its not productive to question their motives. But that doesnt mean that their positions and activity are above reproach. When philanthropists enter the public policy fray, theylike everyone elselegitimately become fair game for criticism and opposition. Tax-exempt status shouldnt create sacred cows.