General Discussion

diabeticman

(3,121 posts) Fri Apr 18, 2014, 09:13 PM Apr 2014

Rachel Maddow putting on the table RIGHT now a great case why we should have NEVER gotten rid of the

space program in the U.S.

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Rachel Maddow putting on the table RIGHT now a great case why we should have NEVER gotten rid of the (Original Post) diabeticman Apr 2014 OP

Geez. I was thinking Fairness Doctrine pscot Apr 2014 #1

I was thinking Glass Steagall. L0oniX Apr 2014 #2

I'll take Glass-Steagall & the Space Program. Benton D Struckcheon Apr 2014 #4

space shuttle not the space program rickford66 Apr 2014 #3

The story has been on media nadinbrzezinski Apr 2014 #5

pscot

(21,024 posts)

1. Geez. I was thinking Fairness Doctrine

Reply to diabeticman (Original post)

Fri Apr 18, 2014, 09:15 PM

Apr 2014

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)

2. I was thinking Glass Steagall.

Reply to pscot (Reply #1)

Fri Apr 18, 2014, 09:19 PM

Apr 2014

Benton D Struckcheon

(2,347 posts)

4. I'll take Glass-Steagall & the Space Program.

Reply to L0oniX (Reply #2)

Fri Apr 18, 2014, 09:21 PM

Apr 2014

As for the Fairness Doctrine, meh. We still have it, in that the State of the Union always has a response, which is just silly.

rickford66

(5,528 posts)

3. space shuttle not the space program

Reply to diabeticman (Original post)

Fri Apr 18, 2014, 09:21 PM

Apr 2014

The private space corporations will take over. They of course could never have progressed as far as they have without the years of research and funding of NASA.

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)

5. The story has been on media

Reply to diabeticman (Original post)

Fri Apr 18, 2014, 09:23 PM

Apr 2014

For a week or so. Some of us even pointed that out.

Reply to this discussion