Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(72,028 posts)
Wed Mar 28, 2012, 02:34 PM Mar 2012

Police WANTED Warrant: 'If You Go With What Was Reported 1st Night-There Would Have Been An Arrest'

Trayvon Martin Case: Police Wanted Warrant To Arrest George Zimmerman, Prosecutor Says

The special prosecutor in the Trayvon Martin case said that the Sanford Police Department asked the state attorney's office for an arrest warrant to charge George Zimmerman early in the investigation, but the state's attorney's office decided to wait.

"If you go with what was reported in the press the first night, there would have been an arrest right away, but obviously something gave investigators pause,"the source said to the Herald.



http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/28/trayvon-martin-case-polic_n_1384301.html?ref=topbar
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

gateley

(62,683 posts)
1. It's not unusual, I don't think, for a prosecutor to decide a case doesn't have the facts/proof for
Wed Mar 28, 2012, 02:37 PM
Mar 2012

a conviction and not pursue it, but it sure seems the decision was made WAY too fast. Especially since the lead investigator -- who was AT the scene, wanted a warrent issued.

X_Digger

(18,585 posts)
3. A DA/State's Attorney's refusal to file charges isn't unusual, no.
Wed Mar 28, 2012, 02:41 PM
Mar 2012

But with Sanford PD and the DA's history of reluctance to charge suspects when the victim is black, you have to wonder.

If nothing else, this should cause increased scrutiny on the State's Attorney's office.

TheWraith

(24,331 posts)
2. Bullshit. The police wouldn't require a full arrest warrant to detain Zimmerman.
Wed Mar 28, 2012, 02:38 PM
Mar 2012

Material witness laws allow for them to detain people who are materially relevant to a felony investigation. Usually for anywhere from 24 to 48 hours. Technically this isn't supposed to be used on suspects, but it is anyway often to hold them prior to having the formal evidence for an arrest warrant.

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
5. Under normal circumstances, that would be true.
Wed Mar 28, 2012, 02:50 PM
Mar 2012

But under Florida's Stand Your Ground law, the PD can be sued for making an arrest that turns out to be justifiable under their SYG law.

The Sanford PD went to the state attorney general's office for a warrant to prevent the possibility of such a lawsuit.

TheWraith

(24,331 posts)
6. No, it doesn't. And even then, material witness detention isn't an "arrest."
Wed Mar 28, 2012, 02:59 PM
Mar 2012

Technically, you're simply being detained to help in the investigation.

And the Florida law specifically says "criminal prosecution," not "arrest." Criminal prosecution is defined as charges being filed: in other words, if the police determine that you really did shoot someone to protect your life, you can't be officially charged. It doesn't say that you can't be arrested in the course of an investigation.

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
7. You can sue a police department for false arrest, unlawful detainment.
Wed Mar 28, 2012, 03:08 PM
Mar 2012

That sort of thing, that's what they were trying to avoid.

TheWraith

(24,331 posts)
8. And in this case, be laughed right the hell out of court when you do.
Wed Mar 28, 2012, 03:31 PM
Mar 2012

False arrest is arrest without probable cause, like a black guy driving a nice car gets arrested for car theft. False arrest does not mean being detained for questioning after shooting someone.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Police WANTED Warrant: 'I...