General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNew York Times’ David Brooks Says Obama Has ‘A Manhood Problem In The Middle East’
By Ben Armbruster
New York Times columnist David Brooks on Sunday claimed that President Obamas foreign policy isnt tough and that he has a manhood problem in the Middle East.
Pivoting off Sen. Bob Corkers (R-TN) charge on NBCs Meet the Press that Russian President Vladimir Putins actions in Ukraine have showed an era of permissiveness under Obama, later in the program, Brooks while noting that he doesnt necessarily agree with the charge said this issue extends to the Middle East:
BROOKS: Basically since Yalta weve had an assumption that borders are basically going to be borders and once that comes into question if in Ukraine or in Crimea or anywhere else, then all over the world all bets are off. And lets face it, Obama, whether deservedly or not, does have a Ill say it crudely but a manhood problem in the Middle East. Is he tough enough to stand up to somebody like Assad or somebody like Putin? I think a lot of the rap is unfair but certainly in the Middle East there is an assumption that hes not tough enough.
NBCs Chuck Todd agreed. By the way, internally they fear this you know its not just Corker saying it, questioning whether the president is being alpha-male, he said. Thats essentially saying hes not alpha-dog. His rhetoric isnt tough enough.
<...>
What Brooks and Todd are essentially saying is that Obama isnt more willing to use or talk about the military option as a foreign policy tool, as much as, perhaps, his predecessor was. The Weekly Standards Bill Kristol who championed the war in Iraq and has been calling for one in Iran is also a proponent of this kind of manhood in foreign policy construct. Real action in Iran, he said earlier this year, is not using diplomacy to solve the nuclear crisis, its a military attack.
So far, however, it appears that Obamas diplomatic approach to the Iranian nuclear issue is paying off.
http://thinkprogress.org/world/2014/04/20/3428792/brooks-obama-manhood-problem-middle-east/
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)Johonny
(20,854 posts)so he can feel like a man.
the 2003 invasion of Iraq, Brooks argued forcefully for American military intervention, echoing the belief of commentators and political figures that American and British forces would be welcomed as liberators
How wrong can you be and still have people seek out your opinion and treat you like an intellectual. I'm just saying before the war the majority of Americans did not believe this lie and yet WE still aren't sought out for our opinion but this idiot is... America!
Faux pas
(14,682 posts)I prefer a man with a cool head. A cool head has NOTHING to do with manhood. What a pair of big talking pussies. Barf.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Tom Ripley
(4,945 posts)Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)tularetom
(23,664 posts)When they see the word "manhood".
underpants
(182,837 posts)and sees a prick wearing glasses "Hey! I'll write about that!!"
Tom Ripley
(4,945 posts)bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)spanone
(135,846 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Remember bush in his flight suit? I guess Obama needs a flight suit and a mission accomplished banner to get hs 'manhood' back.