Rhetorical question.

then went in with a bias and processed the case with that bias. The entire dept has a bias against a portion of the residents they serve. Note it doesn't matter is they have what we call tokens on the force either...MSM should search them out.

The 1st being the apparent lack of injuries.

the autopsy of the victim. No blooded knuckles, no attack or punches.

He said he saw no evidence of a physical struggle on Trayvon. Just the GSW.

If that turns out to be the case, there HAS to be a trial..

by the angle that the shooter was not underneath the victim.

I doubt VERY much that a shooter is EVER allowed to walk behind the deputies, with no one directly watching him --- this demonstrates the lack of protocol, of security the police have in George's handling.

WRONG! the sanford PD totally screwed up and that now adds another layer to the case---if they had done the correct thing, this would pretty much have been open and shut manslaughter and george would be in jail right now, awaiting trial...

It is the old Sherlock Holmes rule of the best place to hide things is in plain sight.

A while back I saw something I didn't see.

Our nation is more secure because of.... I won't go any further. It was so obvious I was being duped because I saw what I didn't see.

It is important to evaluate what you see ... but when things are missing you must ask ...WHY?

Thanks for the thread, kpete.