Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Swagman

(1,934 posts)
Mon Apr 28, 2014, 05:26 AM Apr 2014

(US) Drone strikes based on work at Pine Gap could see Australians charged

Australian military and intelligence personnel involved in controversial US drone targeting operations may be vulnerable to crimes against humanity charges, according to former prime minister Malcolm Fraser.

Mr Fraser said Australians working at the US-run Joint Defence Facility Pine Gap - which reportedly plays a key role in locating drone targets - do not have the same legal protection as their US counterparts.

"The greater danger is the use to which Pine Gap is now put," Mr Fraser told RN Breakfast.
"Initially Pine Gap was collecting information - it was, if you like, listening in.

"It's now targeting weapons systems. It's also very much involved in the targeting of drones.

"The purposes for which drones are used are going to be outlawed at some point by international agreement, and the Americans might believe that Americans involved in those programs are given legal cover under the War Powers Resolution passed after 9/11.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-04-28/australians-could-be-charged-over-us-drone-strikes-fraser/5416224

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
(US) Drone strikes based on work at Pine Gap could see Australians charged (Original Post) Swagman Apr 2014 OP
The US members don't have any legal protection either Demeter Apr 2014 #1
 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
1. The US members don't have any legal protection either
Mon Apr 28, 2014, 08:04 AM
Apr 2014

from international opinion. They only have protection from international courts because the US doesn't belong to them.

The fact that a rogue regime at home protects them doesn't make what they do legal.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»(US) Drone strikes based ...