Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 11:03 AM Mar 2012

Hope 2.0: Inside Obama's Campaign

from Tim Dickinson at Rolling Stone: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/hope-2-0-inside-obamas-campaign-20120329?page=3


Frank Polich/Getty Images

PASS through security into the headquarters of Obama 2012, and the effect is like stepping into the world's most high-tech dorm room. Spanning the entire floor of a Chicago skyscraper, the campaign's nerve center boasts a ping-pong table, a staff of 300 and a life-size cardboard cutout of the president dressed in a University of Montana jersey. They don't use phones up here; most of the digital team weren't even issued any. Instead, campaign workers communicate mostly by e-mail, G-chat and Twitter. Rows of young staffers, some perched on yoga balls, are quietly coding new online tools to engage supporters, tweaking a video of Sarah Palin attacking Obama, and tracking metrics of volunteers recruited and new voters registered. An energetic hum fills the room, punctuated only by mouse clicks.

Given Barack Obama's transformation from insurgent politician to establishment president, you might expect his re-election campaign to emphasize the benefits of incumbency, leaning on big-dollar donors and party insiders. But the campaign staff assembled in Chicago has a different plan to return Obama to the White House: They're building the mother of all field campaigns – one that is even more dependent on face-to-face organizing than it was four years ago. Obama 2.0 has been quietly re-engineered from the bottom up, powered by new high-tech organizing tools designed to mobilize volunteers and target new voters more quickly and efficiently. By the start of early voting in October, the campaign expects to transform college dorms and coffeehouses across the country into 20,000 all-volunteer, fully functioning field offices.

"To be honest, I'm amazed at what they're doing," says Temo Figueroa, who directed Obama's field operation against Hillary Clinton in 2008 but is not a part of the campaign this year. "It makes what we were doing look like a startup."

Obama and his team know that come fall, they will face an epic ad war backed by the nearly limitless funds being poured into Republican Super PACs. So the campaign is returning to the potent combination of cutting-edge technology and timeworn field techniques it deployed in 2008 – the president's one advantage that the GOP can't match. "The other side has decided this is a race about Super PAC ads," says Jim Messina, the campaign manager of Obama 2012. "We have a different theory about the whole deal. Both sides are going to have beautiful TV ads, and everyone is going to spend millions of dollars. But we're going to win this on the ground, person-to-person, volunteers talking to voters about the issues."


full article: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/hope-2-0-inside-obamas-campaign-20120329


Volunteers signing up at the Obama for America Arkansas office grand opening.

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hope 2.0: Inside Obama's Campaign (Original Post) bigtree Mar 2012 OP
kick bigtree Mar 2012 #1
Hope 1.0 wouldnt boot on my system bart95 Mar 2012 #2
must be your operating system bigtree Mar 2012 #3
that could be it bart95 Mar 2012 #4
the 'jig' woman? bigtree Mar 2012 #5
' looks like she and you are of the same mind' --> WOW! bart95 Mar 2012 #6
she and her husband couldn't take 'yes' for an answer bigtree Mar 2012 #7
o hai! UR stl here. MineralMan Mar 2012 #9
kick bigtree Mar 2012 #8
 

bart95

(488 posts)
2. Hope 1.0 wouldnt boot on my system
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 12:29 PM
Mar 2012

did i get the wrong version or something?

my results seem very different

 

bart95

(488 posts)
4. that could be it
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 12:46 PM
Mar 2012

because the job market looks a lot different to applicants, than it does to someone who hangs around with rich tech contributers, who benefit from a glutted job market

"Jennifer Wedel of Fort Worth asked why the government continues "to issue and extend H-1B visas when there are tons of Americans just like my husband with no job?"

She was persistent and at one point broke in on the president as he gave a response, to ask: "Why do you think the H-1B program is so popular with corporations?"

After learning that Darin Wedel is a semiconductor engineer, Obama said that "the word we're getting is that somebody in that kind of high-tech field, that kind of engineer, should be able to find something right away"

http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9223975/Engineer_s_wife_ferocious_in_Obama_Q_A_on_H_1Bs

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
5. the 'jig' woman?
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 01:00 PM
Mar 2012

Her husband can't relocate to where the jobs the President found for him are because of some personal family issue. Otherwise, he received several offers after President Obama submitted his resume for him to several employers.

It's a joke to use this fool, who asked the President to 'dance a little jig' for her after he offered to take her husbands resume and shop it around for him, as an example of some failure on the part of this president. After receiving several offers as a result of the President's personal intervention, this lady says she's not voting for him. Go figure. Sounds and looks like she and you are of the same mind.

 

bart95

(488 posts)
6. ' looks like she and you are of the same mind' --> WOW!
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 01:06 PM
Mar 2012

sound like we ought to make it a hate crime for any tech worker to claim they cant find a job

'Hope 2.0.....unless you're racist or something' LOL

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
7. she and her husband couldn't take 'yes' for an answer
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 01:15 PM
Mar 2012

The President found her husband work and he turned it down because of personal issues. It's ridiculous to hold this couple up as victims. They've had much more opportunity than most.

You pick this old article up off of a Google list and act as if it represents or relates your Perot nonsense from over a decade ago. You failed miserably because you haven't even bothered to follow the story all the way through. Your 'argument' completely discredited by this tangential (at best) reference you've made (and insist on defending) to a couple who were actually directly aided by this President in their job search.

THEN, you add the race cr . . .

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hope 2.0: Inside Obama's ...