Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 12:10 PM Mar 2012

IIRC, back in early 2008 EVERY Democratic candidate running in the presidential primaries

had a health care reform plan that INCLUDED a public option! How did we end up with HCR bill under one of those Democrats without one?

Was every candidate running back then either

a) naive about political realities

b) lying to us

c) sincere but too trusting

d) other

I cannot for the life of me figure this out! I truly don't know what we were thinking back then. We had some extremely bright, sophisticated and savvy political people running. Insiders as well as outsiders. Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden were no rookies. Obama had served in the U.S. Senate.

I wanted to ask Howard Dean this when I saw him on Morning Joe today. I wish I could have been able to do so...

DU, help me understand this a little better!

Thanks.



15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

shraby

(21,946 posts)
1. The dinos got hold of it in committe..between those kinds and the republicans,
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 12:16 PM
Mar 2012

it was pre-determined that with a public option in it, it would never get out of committe or get a positive vote on the floor.

TheWraith

(24,331 posts)
2. There were not the votes for a public option in the Senate.
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 12:16 PM
Mar 2012

It's that simple. There weren't enough people who supported it.

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
3. 4 of those candidates were serving in the Senate at the time they were running, tho!
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 12:25 PM
Mar 2012

I can't believe that ALL four of them didn't have a clue about what kind of opposition they would face. Especially Joe Biden and Chris Dodd, two oldtimers.

But, again, maybe they did, but they were in competition for Democrats primary votes and thought they had no choice but to list it. That's a bit cynical, but perhaps it just happened that way.

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
5. yes, I understand that. But I remember at DU back then we were all comparing the candidates'
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 12:43 PM
Mar 2012

platforms and no one was even uttering a slight bit of concern about actually getting something through. As I recall, we were mostly pretty wary of the DINOs back then.

And even on DU itself, I don't recall too much worry about the DINOs blocking stuff either. Or maybe I had my head in the sand. Maybe we were all just a bit too excited about winning that we didn't want to think any harder about it than we did...

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
7. I completely agree
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 01:26 PM
Mar 2012

the candidates all told us what we wanted to hear, and we put our blinders on, or at the very least, didn't question HOW they would deliver.

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
8. And even if you DID question, you would get an icy "thank you for your 'concern'" in
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 02:22 PM
Mar 2012

response here, from people who, IMO, should have been more open to that questioning.

But looking back I do kinda cringe at my own gullibility

 

Pab Sungenis

(9,612 posts)
6. Two words:
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 12:56 PM
Mar 2012

Max Baucus.

He killed the public option and any real reform in his version of the bill, and Harry Reid played "gutless wonder" by bringing that bill to the floor instead of Teddy Kennedy's.

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
9. yep. the unfolding of this thing was quite disheartening.
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 02:26 PM
Mar 2012

I remember how we were all talking about the public option this and the public option that. All the time we were just heading over a cliff...

librechik

(30,674 posts)
10. words which will live in infamy
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 02:35 PM
Mar 2012

I am almost as furious at Baucus as I am at Scalia, and that's saying a lot.

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
11. I am hoping that OWS will create a new political class that will sign up to run for office against
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 02:47 PM
Mar 2012

the Max Baucus's of the elected representatives of the people, really take them on. The pendulum has to swing back in our favor. The system is very rotten...

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
15. Did he lead our side on? My memory is that he blocked everything right at the begiinning...
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 03:02 PM
Mar 2012

but maybe he pretended to give us some slender thread of hope. He certainly didn't voice any "problems" during the primaries when everyone was talking about the public option...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»IIRC, back in early 2008 ...