General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsVote to repeal subsidies for Big Oil fails 51- 47
by Joan McCarter
One of the key votes to set up the political narrative for the next ten months takes place in the Senate shortly. That's when the Senate decides whether to move forward to vote to end subsidies to Big OIL. In a surprise vote on Monday, Republicans nearly unanimously agreed to have the debate about Big Oil this week, thinking that they would have the upper hand by insisting that ending these subsidies would just for the poor, beleaguered "energy producers" to raise prices at the pump.
<...>
...Among the "no" votes so far, Dems Mark Begich (AK), Mary Landrieu (LA), Jim Webb (VA).
Republican Susan Collins is an "aye."
...Ben Nelson, "no."
...Olympia Snowe: "Aye"
...Manchin was an "aye," but no matter. It fails 51-47, because of course majority no longer rules in the Senate.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/03/29/1078859/-Senate-votes-to-repeal-Big-Oil-tax-breaks
gateley
(62,683 posts)do something about that?
This is INFURIATING! Although I'm spitting invectives at Begich and the other turncoats, I DO realize that their States rely heavily on Big Oil revenue.
phantom power
(25,966 posts)In fact, sooner or later they'll have that opportunity and they'll dump the 60 vote requirement like yesterday's fish. You heard it here first.
gateley
(62,683 posts)If I understand it correctly, the only reason we do this is because of the THREAT of a filibuster by the Republicans. i don't think we've EVER called them on it, have we? And now this seems to have become SOP.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)KansDem
(28,498 posts)This might explain why:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filibuster_in_the_United_States_Senate
Molly Ivins said it best: "Republicans don't want to govern; they want to rule" and governing requires compromise...
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)Why oh why should we consider her a Democrat? Even after James O Keffe gets cuaght trying to bug her phones, she still does everything the GOP wants!
gateley
(62,683 posts)TeamsterDem
(1,173 posts)by not opening new business until the filibuster closes course? That wouldn't take a change to the Senate rules, just an agreement between the leadership to not open new business until a filibuster is somehow dispatched.