General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNew Mexico taking aim at drone use in hunting
New Mexico taking aim at drone use in hunting
By SUSAN MONTOYA BRYAN
Associated Press May 2, 2014
New Mexico is in line to become the next state to take aim at the use of drones for hunting big game animals
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. New Mexico is in line to become the next state to take aim at the use of drones for hunting big game animals.
Alaska, Colorado and Montana already have outlawed the use of drones in hunting, but some sportsmen groups and animal advocates are pushing to see that regulations are passed in every state to protect the concept of fair chase.
They argue the art of hunting should be based on skills and traditions that have been honed and passed down over generations, not technological advancements such as drones.
"Hunting an animal with your physical senses, with your eyes and your ears and even to a lesser extent your sense of smell, that puts you on fairly even ground with these animals that can see far better, hear far better and smell far better than we can," said Joel Gay, a spokesman for the New Mexico Wildlife Federation.
Drones would simply take the challenge out of hunting and could lead to the sport becoming more exclusive, Gay and others said.
More:
http://www.thestate.com/2014/05/02/3423329/new-mexico-taking-aim-at-drone.html#storylink=cpy
HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)Even ground with the animals, who of course have rifles and the capability of using them on the hunters.
Skittles
(153,174 posts)unarmed animals against armed hunters - they consider that fair, "even gound" fucking morons
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)My favorite is the atlatl - a Native American throwing aid.
But that too was a technological advance.
How about just scaring wolves from carcasses?
Recursion
(56,582 posts)It's an amazing device. But, yeah, in general I think bows are about as far as hunting technology should go, except for species where we've already killed their other predators.
(For the curious, yes: I killed a groundhog with the atlatl. Yes, I ate it. .)
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)oneshooter
(8,614 posts)pipoman
(16,038 posts)Completely reasonable other than hogs...
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)"Mommy, he doesn't look like Bambi, and he smells bad, too."
I support a good law, but their maybe problems if some rancher is checking his fences with a drone, and gets a fish & wildlife officer takes exception.
Last season, I took a deer while sitting under a tree in a pasture, and while waiting by the hwy edge for a pick-up, watched two hobbyists navigate a drone, using a cell phone camera duct taped to it. They weren't hunting, even though I killed my deer less than a .5 mile away, and I had a cell phone for safety reason.
I imagine the hunting regs will resemble those in Alaska governing bush pilots.
Orrex
(63,219 posts)Oh, wait a minute...
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)those hunters not using them will report illegal use as the racket could adveresly affect their own hunt. Of course PeTA and some other anti-hunting groups advocate their use for just that reason. But, I have an easily-installed full choke on my shotgun!
Separation
(1,975 posts)I know in Alaska you have to wait 24 hours to hunt after taking a helo or float/bush plane once at camp.
Fish & Game up there don't mess around they literally hide in the bushes waiting for somebody to do a Filipino flip and snag a salmon. As it illegal to catch a salmon anywhere other than the mouth hook. When you have 100's-1000's of salmon flying by some people can't resist an get busted.
F&G actually asked us to make sure that a group of hunters weren't out actually hunting and just chilling at camp. Obviously they didn't give a shit and were out setting blinds actively tracking. We call it in to F&G and the busted them with moose and a black bear.
Sucks to be them, they loose all meat and hides. Weapons confiscated. X