Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Better Believe It

(18,630 posts)
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 07:38 PM Mar 2012

Alaska Wilderness League: Obama ignores facts and continues to give green light to Arctic drilling



Press Release
President Obama ignores facts and continues to give green light to Arctic drilling
Statement from Cindy Shogan, Executive Director, Alaska Wilderness League
March 28, 2012


“Today’s announcement that the Obama administration has approved Shell’s oil spill response plan
for the Arctic’s Beaufort Sea, following on the tail of the approval of Shell’s spill response plan for
the Arctic’s Chukchi Sea, is extremely disappointing. There is no viable way to clean up an oil spill in
the extreme conditions of America’s Arctic Ocean, yet the Obama administration continues to give
the green light to Shell Oil’s plans for drilling this summer. We can only hope that President Obama
shows the leadership he promised and refuses to bow to the demands of Big Oil by not granting
Shell the final permits it needs to begin drilling in July.

The Arctic Ocean is prone to hurricane-force storms, 20-foot swells, sea ice up to 25 feet thick, subzero
temperatures and months-long darkness. What’s more, the Arctic has extremely limited
infrastructure (there are no roads or deep water ports and only a handful of small airports) and the
nearest Coast Guard station is 1,000 miles away. These conditions and the current lack of
information and technology combine to make Arctic drilling tantamount to ‘Mission Impossible.’

At a recent meeting in Alaska, officials with the international Arctic Council noted that Arctic
nations are not ready to respond to an Arctic oil spill. ‘In terms of getting the tug equipment there
[to a spill in the Arctic] or in the Aleutians, we are naked in the north,’ said Alaska’s Lieutenant
Governor Mead Treadwell, according to KTVA.com.

Meanwhile, the oil industry continues to remind us that drilling is a dangerous and dirty business.
Today the news out of Britain is grim as the gas spill in the North Sea enters its fourth day.
According to news reports, an enormous gas cloud is spewing from the ‘well from hell’ and there is
extreme danger of a massive explosion. It could take six months to fully stop the leak.

The gas spill in the North Sea and other recent disasters – including a recent natural gas blowout in
Alaska - remind us that the risks are too great, particularly in places like the Arctic where the
challenges are foreboding. If President Obama fails to stop Shell from drilling in America’s Arctic
Ocean he could be left with the next major drilling disaster on his hands and the destruction of one
of our planet’s most vital ecosystems.”

http://www.alaskawild.org/wp-content/uploads/2012_03_28_Obama_ignores_facts_green_light_drilling.pdf


--------------------------------------------------------------------



FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
March 28, 2012
CONTACT: Center for Biological Diversity
Feds Approve Weak Oil-spill Response Plan in Arctic; Move Toward Offshore Drilling Off Virginia


SAN FRANCISCO - March 28 - Interior Secretary Ken Salazar announced approval today of Shell Oil’s oil-spill response plan for offshore drilling in the Beaufort Sea off Alaska. At the same time, the secretary announced plans to move forward with seismic exploratory surveys for oil in the Atlantic Ocean, off the coast of Virginia. Both announcements move these areas that have largely been closed to offshore drilling closer to becoming industrial oil fields.

“It’s deeply disappointing that President Obama is choosing to ignore the enormous risks of opening the Arctic Ocean to oil drilling,” said Miyoko Sakashita, oceans director at the Center for Biological Diversity. “All signs point to environmental disaster if an oil spill were to occur in the harsh Arctic waters — it’s just absurd that Shell’s unproven response plan got the green light.”

The unrealistic oil spill plan claims that 95% of oil spilled could be recovered when only 3% of oil was recovered in the wake of the Deepwater Horizon spill. Drilling in the extreme conditions of the Arctic Ocean could put human lives and wildlife at risk; so far, testing of oil-spill response in the area has proven a failure, the containment cap in the plan is untested, and the nearest Coast Guard station is 1,000 miles away. The Arctic is home to the most pristine ocean habitat in the world for polar bears, whales and walruses.

Earlier this year, Shell Oil sued the Center and other environmental organizations, asking the court to declare that its oil-spill response plan for the Chukchi Sea was adequate — a move seemingly aimed at intimidating organizations opposing Shell’s plans to drill in the Arctic this summer.

The government today also announced plans to conduct seismic surveys along the Atlantic coast in hopes of finding oil deposits that could lead to leasing Atlantic waters for offshore drilling. The seismic surveys pave the way for new drilling.

“Seismic surveys are, in and of themselves, very harmful to marine life. The blasts are like explosions that can cause hearing loss, disturbance and even stranding for animals like whales,” said Sakashita. “And besides hurting marine animals, these exploratory surveys are the gateway to more risky drilling.”

The Center and its allies are part of a pending lawsuit challenging seismic surveys for oil and gas in the Gulf of Mexico that were approved without the permits needed under the Marine Mammal Protection Act and Endangered Species Act.
.
###

At the Center for Biological Diversity, we believe that the welfare of human beings is deeply linked to nature - to the existence in our world of a vast diversity of wild animals and plants. Because diversity has intrinsic value, and because its loss impoverishes society, we work to secure a future for all species, great and small, hovering on the brink of extinction. We do so through science, law, and creative media, with a focus on protecting the lands, waters, and climate that species need to survive.

http://www.commondreams.org/newswire/2012/03/28-7


--------------------------------------------------------------------

Obama Admin Takes Steps Towards More Oil Drilling
Shell's oil spill plan for Beaufort Sea drilling approved, seismic surveys for oil off east coast get OK
by Common Dreams staff
March 28, 2012


The Obama administration has taken steps towards increased oil drilling today in Alaska and off the east coat. It approved Shell's oil spill response plan for the Arctic waters of the Beaufort Sea, a move slammed by environmental groups who warn of a likely environmental catastophe if Shell is given its final permits. The administration also allowed today seismic exploratory surveys for oil off the coast of Virginia in the Atlantic Ocean.

Shell's oil spill plan suggests little likelihood of a blowout and calls for a containment device like the one used in the Deepwater Horizon blowout to be clamped onto the well in the event that Shell's built-in blowout preventer failed.

"If Shell goes there to drill, they will kill the Arctic Ocean along the way—we must fight and stop them," says Subhankar Banerjee, founder of ClimateStoryTellers.org.

http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2012/03/28-8



20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Alaska Wilderness League: Obama ignores facts and continues to give green light to Arctic drilling (Original Post) Better Believe It Mar 2012 OP
Du rec. Nt xchrom Mar 2012 #1
Yeah, but there would be MORE drilling with a Repuke President... joeybee12 Mar 2012 #2
Damn "treehuggers" have to ruin everything! Better Believe It Mar 2012 #4
Maybe, but then Democrats usually fight this shit from the TeaPubliKlans. TheKentuckian Mar 2012 #6
thank goodness we don't have just cheerleaders here fascisthunter Mar 2012 #3
Why is Ken Salazar still a part of this administration? sabrina 1 Mar 2012 #5
Have we ever had a real person of science as Secretary of the Interior? Mendocino Mar 2012 #9
So how can we change that? sabrina 1 Mar 2012 #12
Elect a liberal President? Better Believe It Mar 2012 #13
There are no really liberal candidates running for office with a legit shot of winning. Jamaal510 Mar 2012 #19
still trying to destroy this president by posting on a discussion board? KG Mar 2012 #7
Let's hope this horrid plan does not ever occur! ellisonz Mar 2012 #8
There is ProSense Mar 2012 #10
Drilling can take place without destruction to the environment. bluestate10 Mar 2012 #11
Why is more drilling necessary, other than for profits for Big Oil? sabrina 1 Mar 2012 #14
More drilling is necessary for more exports. The oil that is obtained will not be sold here. Better Believe It Mar 2012 #16
I live here. There is no good way to drill. No way. We had the Exxon spill shit for roguevalley Mar 2012 #15
Right on, Rogue. Blue_In_AK Mar 2012 #18
you and me both, blue. I am google % with you, honey. I remember before oil that we were dems here. roguevalley Mar 2012 #20
Drilling in the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas is absolutely stupid, Blue_In_AK Mar 2012 #17
 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
2. Yeah, but there would be MORE drilling with a Repuke President...
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 07:46 PM
Mar 2012

Just getting that in before the usual suspects do.

KNR

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
6. Maybe, but then Democrats usually fight this shit from the TeaPubliKlans.
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 08:22 PM
Mar 2012

Drill, baby, drill...it isn't just for Republicans anymore.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
5. Why is Ken Salazar still a part of this administration?
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 08:00 PM
Mar 2012

The oil Corps never had a better friend.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/18/us/politics/18salazarcnd.html?_r=2&pagewanted=2

Environmentalists Wary of Obama’s Interior Pick

“He is a right-of-center Democrat who often favors industry and big agriculture in battles over global warming, fuel efficiency and endangered species,” said Kieran Suckling, executive director of Center for Biological Diversity, which tracks endangered species and habitat issues. “He is very unlikely to bring significant change to the scandal-plagued Department of Interior. It’s a very disappointing choice for a presidency which promised visionary change.”


“Salazar has a disturbingly weak conservation record, particularly on energy development, global warming, endangered wildlife and protecting scientific integrity,” said Mr. Patterson, who was elected last month to the Arizona House of Representatives from Tucson and who supports fellow Arizonan Mr. Grijalva for the Interior job. “It’s no surprise oil and gas, mining, agribusiness and other polluting industries that have dominated Interior are supporting rancher Salazar — he’s their friend.”



And he proved what a bad pick he was during the Gulf Oil disaster. I hope he is not staying on for the next term. Now is the time to ask these questions and find out who will be in the next cabinet.

Mendocino

(7,495 posts)
9. Have we ever had a real person of science as Secretary of the Interior?
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 09:15 PM
Mar 2012

Unfortunately this position has traditionally gone to political hacks, campaign contributors and lawyers. Only a few such as Stewart Udall or Bruce Babbitt have done good work.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
12. So how can we change that?
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 09:48 PM
Mar 2012

Are presidents just told who they must put in these positions or can they make their own choices? It seems more and more that we have lost control of this government and that no matter who is elected, it is the Corporations who are in control.

Jamaal510

(10,893 posts)
19. There are no really liberal candidates running for office with a legit shot of winning.
Fri Mar 30, 2012, 01:01 AM
Mar 2012

For example, there's Ralph Nader. But everyone knows he can't win, and would simply be a spoiler for Republicans to win. In order for us to really see some progressive movement, we not only need Obama re-elected, but a comfortable Dem majority in both the House and Senate. Otherwise, not much will get done.

ellisonz

(27,711 posts)
8. Let's hope this horrid plan does not ever occur!
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 08:31 PM
Mar 2012

Robert Redford against this plan and some Shell propaganda: http://www.democraticunderground.com/101715921

The Chairman of Shell thinks our energy policy is confused and preemptively sued a dozen environmental organizations: http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002411098

Fuck Shell.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
10. There is
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 09:25 PM
Mar 2012

still time to kill this.

BSEE Issues Approval for Shell Beaufort Sea Oil Spill Response Plan

Thorough review incorporates interagency comments and lessons learned

2012-03-28 Washington, DC

The Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) today issued an approval of Shell Gulf of Mexico, Inc.’s Oil Spill Response Plan (OSRP) for the Beaufort Sea. This decision follows the bureau’s thorough review of the plan and consultations with federal and state partner agencies involved in Arctic oil spill response. Shell has proposed drilling up to four shallow water exploration wells in Alaska’s Beaufort Sea this summer, beginning on July 1.

The approval issued today does not authorize Shell to begin drilling in the Beaufort Sea; Shell must still obtain approval from BSEE for well-specific drilling permits prior to commencing drilling operations.

“We have conducted an exhaustive review of Shell’s response plan for the Beaufort Sea,” said BSEE Director James A. Watson. “Our focus moving forward will be to hold Shell accountable and to follow-up with exercises, reviews and inspections to ensure that all personnel and equipment are positioned and ready.”

Shell plans to stage a full suite of response assets near the offshore drill site for immediate response, while also having additional equipment available for quick delivery in the event that sustained spill response is necessary. BSEE’s approval follows months of comprehensive internal, public, and interagency review, including involvement of the Interagency Working Group on Coordination of Domestic Energy Development and Permitting in Alaska, chaired by Department of the Interior Deputy Secretary David J. Hayes. More information on the federal government’s preparedness and response coordination efforts is available at: http://www.bsee.gov/BSEE-Newsroom/BSEE-Fact-Sheet/Arctic-Fact-Sheet.aspx.

Shell was required to substantially rewrite previously approved Arctic spill response plans to make clear their plan to mobilize and sustain a massive response over an extended period of time. Among other changes and more stringent requirements, BSEE required Shell to:

- Prepare for a worst case discharge nearly three times that of their previous Beaufort Sea plan, and in adverse weather conditions;

- Graph the trajectory of the potential worst case discharge over a 30-day period, as opposed to the 3-day graph in their previous plan;

- Identify the specific equipment they would use for dispersant application and in-situ burning; and

- Provide additional detail on the logistics of bringing equipment in from outside the region.

Before drilling in the Beaufort Sea, Shell must submit to BSEE applications for permits to drill for each proposed well. Each application will be analyzed based on the unique characteristics of the proposed well and must fully comply with rigorous post-Deepwater Horizon safety and environmental standards, including those relating to well design, workplace safety, and the operator’s ability to deal with the potential for a blowout and worst-case discharge. Shell has proposed a well control containment capability that consists of a combination of a subsea capping stack, and surface separation equipment that will be located on a newly-built containment vessel, all of which will be inspected by BSEE prior to the beginning of any proposed operations.

Shell must also comply with requirements imposed by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) in its conditional approval of Shell’s Exploration Plan for the Beaufort Sea. These conditions include requirements that Shell have available and demonstrate its ability to deploy a well capping and containment system, as well as take measures to avoid conflicts with Native Alaskan subsistence activities. Specifically, beginning on August 1, Shell must employ an approved, site-specific bowhead whale monitoring program. Shell must also suspend any drilling operations in the Beaufort Sea by August 25 and may not resume activity until after nearby Native Alaskan villages have completed their subsistence hunts and Shell has received approval from BOEM. For more information, go to: http://www.boem.gov/About-BOEM/BOEM-Regions/Alaska-Region/Leasing-and-Plans/Plans/2012-Shell-Beaufort-EP/Index.aspx.


A copy of the Beaufort Sea OSRP approval letter sent by BSEE to Shell is provided.

A copy of Shell's OSRP for the Beaufort Sea is available here: http://www.bsee.gov/OSRP/Beaufort-Sea-OSRP.aspx

http://www.bsee.gov/BSEE-Newsroom/Press-Releases/2012/press03282012.aspx


Republicans are trying their usual spin to try to pressure the administration:

Obama OKs Oil Exploration Along Atlantic Coast, But Not Drilling

The Obama administration today endorsed new oil and gas exploration along the Atlantic Coast, setting the stage for possible future drilling lease sales.

The announcement by the Interior Department sets into motion what will be at least a five year environmental survey to determine whether and where oil production might occur.

<...>

But Republicans say the announcement is simply for show. Obama delayed and then cancelled a planned 2011 drilling lease sale for areas off the Virginia coast following the BP oil spill in the Gulf.

There are also no guarantees the administration will approve drilling permits at the end of the environmental review.

“The president’s actions have closed an entire new area to drilling on his watch and cheats Virginians out of thousands of jobs,” said Rep. Doc Hastings, R-Wash., who chairs the House Natural Resources Committee.

- more -

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/03/obama-oks-oil-exploration-along-atlantic-coast-but-not-drilling/



bluestate10

(10,942 posts)
11. Drilling can take place without destruction to the environment.
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 09:26 PM
Mar 2012

Oil companies must be held accountable. No more fucking oil spill abatement plans that feature Gulf of Mexico walruses and polar bears. But the Left insisting that any drilling in the Artic and other areas is the start of doom is as fucking stupid as oil spill plans that insist that plan executioners will save and multiple species that exists elsewhere. Drilling for more oil is needed but that drilling must be done under inspection and a concrete set of rules.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
14. Why is more drilling necessary, other than for profits for Big Oil?
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 10:34 PM
Mar 2012

And why do you characterize the concerns of environmentalists as 'left' issues? I know lots of people who are not on the left who are as concerned about rapid deterioration of the environment as anyone on the left, and lots on the left who ignorant of the damage being done to the environment. The Gulf Oil disaster woke up a lot of people who are not on the 'left'.

 

Better Believe It

(18,630 posts)
16. More drilling is necessary for more exports. The oil that is obtained will not be sold here.
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 11:22 PM
Mar 2012

It's all about higher profits via exports.

roguevalley

(40,656 posts)
15. I live here. There is no good way to drill. No way. We had the Exxon spill shit for
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 11:20 PM
Mar 2012

years and they fought it every inch of the way. I don't way drilling here. We cannot live much longer on this planet with petro shit. As for no destruction. They tell you its only 1000 square feet of space for the rigs but its miles of roads and crap on a landscape that takes 200 years to recover from marring. Fucking stupid? No. Live here for 30 years and see what they do, not what they broadcast and lie about.

Blue_In_AK

(46,436 posts)
18. Right on, Rogue.
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 11:30 PM
Mar 2012

I'm so sick of the oil companies, I wish they'd ALL leave. I remember when we used to pay a state income tax, and it wasn't all that awful. It would be worth it to me so see them gone. Maybe then we could get on with some real innovcation around here.

Blue_In_AK

(46,436 posts)
17. Drilling in the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas is absolutely stupid,
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 11:26 PM
Mar 2012

just one of many, many stupid things that are going on here thanks to our oil shills in Congress (Begich was one of the few democrats to vote to continue oil subsidies) and our oil lobbyist governor, Sean Parnell. With Parnell, minerals trump biodiversity every time. He's all in favor of this offshore drilling, even though it benefits Alaska not at all; he's supporting a plan by Pac-Rim Coal to dig up 11 miles of salmon spawning stream to ship coal to China; and, of course, there's the infamous Pebble Mine, which would be one of the largest open-pit copper mines in the world, situated right in the headwaters of the Bristol Bay feeder rivers. Brilliant.


Besides that he wants to kill off all the predators and make Alaska into a giant moose farm for his big-game hunter friends. He's one sick puppy.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Alaska Wilderness League:...