Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNewt and Karl’s latest trick: Inside their good cop-bad cop routine
Newt and Karls latest trick: Inside their good cop-bad cop routineWhy did Gingrich criticize Rove's indelicate comments about Hillary? It's all about hardcore partisan politics
HEATHER DIGBY PARTON
One might have thought that Karl Roves Hillary had brain damage story had served its primary purpose of putting the political media on notice that this juicy morsel was going to be on the menu and so it would be put aside to be brought up at a later date. However, it seems to have opened up some very creative lines of thought among the right-wing intelligentsia. Over at National Review Jim Geraghty made this macabre observation yesterday:
If Republicans had to pick a Democrat to win in 2016
one can easily imagine more formidable opponents in the Oval Office than a then-69-year-old who suffered a blood clot that could, in more dire circumstances, have killed her, or caused severe brain damage, if it had gone untreated.
He then goes on to excitedly speculate about all the potential attack lines based upon her age and allegedly declining mental faculties:
Clintons four years of constant travel and stress at the State Department left her appearing exhausted; its hard to imagine that the daily grind of one of the worlds toughest jobs would leave her appearing and feeling rejuvenated and energetic. As president, Hillary would live in the spotlight nearly 24-7, and every run-of-the-mill misstatement, memory slip, or loss of balance could (and probably would) be interpreted as a sign of a major health issue. President Hillary Clintons health would be a constant distraction, even if she were in perfect health for a woman in her 70s.
more
http://www.salon.com/2014/05/16/newt_and_karls_latest_trick_inside_their_good_cop_bad_cop_routine/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 513 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Newt and Karl’s latest trick: Inside their good cop-bad cop routine (Original Post)
DonViejo
May 2014
OP
MissMillie
(38,562 posts)1. "right-wing intelligentsia"
an oxymoron if I ever saw one.
spanone
(135,846 posts)2. insidious fucks.
Frustratedlady
(16,254 posts)3. Even if Hillary decides not to run,
she should keep it secret to give the RW idiots more time to hang themselves with their stupid statements.