Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWho is a "Real" American
A friend of mine posted this last night; thought it was a good analysis, so am sharing.
This is something on a post that Justin Rosario wrote on the subject of who is a "Real" American.
**I have two answers to this. One political and one sociological. The political answer would be, a real American is the opposite of whatever it is you hate. Do you hate gay people? Then real Americans are beefy heterosexuals. Do you hate Muslims? Then real Americans are Christian. True Muslims and Christians are not opposites per se but you wouldnt know that from watching Fox News, would you? To politicians and other people who feel motivated to label others as "not real" (most notably conservatives) a real American only exists in opposition to something and has no true identity of their own. Which is kind of sad, really. In 20 years, a real American will be one who hates the Chinese with every fiber of their being. You see how this works?
The sociological one is a little messier. We, as a country, do not have a long history behind us. Two hundred plus may SEEM like a lot but compared to the millennia most of Europe and Asia has under its belt, were a newborn. What makes it so interesting is that we were not founded on a race, religion or geographic boundary. We were based on a purely intellectual foundation. Therefore, we are (mostly) free from all of the baggage most of the older cultures of the world labor under. We do not need to maintain or unique cultural identity because we do not have one. We can be as flexible as we need to be to adapt to the new which is part of our ability to succeed. Anyone can come here and be whoever they want. You cannot become Chinese or French but ANYONE can be an American no matter where they came from. Its our greatest strength.
So, from this angle, there is no such thing as a real American because there is no such thing as a false one.**
The sociological one is a little messier. We, as a country, do not have a long history behind us. Two hundred plus may SEEM like a lot but compared to the millennia most of Europe and Asia has under its belt, were a newborn. What makes it so interesting is that we were not founded on a race, religion or geographic boundary. We were based on a purely intellectual foundation. Therefore, we are (mostly) free from all of the baggage most of the older cultures of the world labor under. We do not need to maintain or unique cultural identity because we do not have one. We can be as flexible as we need to be to adapt to the new which is part of our ability to succeed. Anyone can come here and be whoever they want. You cannot become Chinese or French but ANYONE can be an American no matter where they came from. Its our greatest strength.
So, from this angle, there is no such thing as a real American because there is no such thing as a false one.**
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 555 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Who is a "Real" American (Original Post)
babylonsister
May 2014
OP
A shame that the earlier occupants and those from the oldest human continent
BumRushDaShow
May 2014
#1
BumRushDaShow
(129,133 posts)1. A shame that the earlier occupants and those from the oldest human continent
are missing from the analysis, where for the most part, the peoples who were here were displaced and marginalized, and the people from humanity's origin, did not come here by choice, but eventually remained here to remind this society of where they came from.
And this statement -
Anyone can come here and be whoever they want.
Is not quite true as long as a dominant culture controls the narrative and refuses to acknowledge the contributions of the amalgam that has begrudgingly evolved into the modern U.S. "culture" (i.e., those few things that are shared across ethnic groups). The country WAS "founded on a race" because the power of law made and enforced by those of that race, ensured that it was legally acceptable to position that dominant group well over the others by restricting or removing equal access to the vision of the founding documents, unless the individuals were accepted as being a member of that majority group.